Summary Of Architecture In The Experience Economy By Anna Klingman

764 Words2 Pages

Capital A: The Market, Cultural Desires, and the Ever-changing Face of Architecture

Architecture, or more specifically the architecture surrounding commerce, has made a shift from being manufacturing based to more consumer based. Anna Klingmann, in her book Brandscapes – Architecture in the Experience Economy, argues that this shift has only happen in the last decade or so. While the prominence of this phenomenon has become readily apparent in the more contemporary contexts, the idea of a brand – or a lifestyle that revolves around a product or company – has been an integral part of architecture for some time. Klingmann makes many valid points, and I agree with most of her argument, but I would like to step further back in time to analyze …show more content…

Post-war America was thriving on a new consumer culture. The 40-hour work week increased income, manufacturing turned back to goods, and spending from the populous was growing. The creation of Levittown heralded in a new era for architecture. It marked a desire to create a lifestyle, to project an image about oneself. Architecture began to take a more active role in this new economy, and responded to the creation of Levittown. The Case Study movement, and the resulting “Mid-Century Modern” design that stemmed out of it, projected an architecturally influenced lifestyle. It was fun, it was sexy, and it was luxurious. Exploits of these architects were proliferated through stylish periodicals. Hugh Hefner broadcasted the design influences, as well as his lifestyle, to homes across the country on “Playboy After Dark.” The show brought together designers, products, music, and lifestyle in one place. A synergistic approach was starting to be created, long before Starbucks created such a …show more content…

In many cases, we are still developing objects that sit in a field, and do not fully integrate the community or attempt to create an identity for the larger public. A great example of this is Farshid Moussavi’s Museum of Contemporary Art in Cleveland, Ohio. Creating a large obsidian form that rests in the Cleveland landscape, the structure is autonomous. It doesn’t attempt to extend out and have any intervention with its surrounding context. Its brand, or what semblance of one that it has, is purely self-contained. Taking Robert Somol’s idea of the logo in architecture – and skewing it just a bit – this project creates something that could become a logo, or start to brand the area that it’s in. We have an iconic form that could become an image or pattern that flows through the streets, tying together disparate elements and creating an urban lifestyle that revolves around the museum. Instead we get architecture that is afraid to integrate and permeate in ways much larger than just the

Open Document