Stock And Fund Pollutant Case Study

836 Words2 Pages

Question 1
There are two types of pollutants, a stock and fund pollutant. A stock pollutant is one for which the environment has a very little (if any) assimilative capacity. Once you emit the stock pollutant, it would not be absorbed by the environment because there is no a natural process by which a stock pollutant assimilates into the environment. For instance, manufacture which emits the plutonium as its waste product, the plutonium cannot be assimilated by the environment; as a result, the amount of this waste will be higher and keep remaining into the environment for a long time. This pollutant has a long half-life which means it needs a long period of time of a radioactive component to be deteriorated (plutonium half-life: over 100 million years to break it down) so that the level of a stock pollutant will increase over the time. Also, it has an impact for human health when people continuously are being exposure by this pollutant.
On the other hand, a fund pollutant is one for which the environment has an assimilative …show more content…

First, there is a ‘command and control’ approach which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets a pollution level through a standards approach and there will be a punishment or penalize if polluters do not meet the level of pollution controlled that is already regulated. Besides, EPA also sets a requirement on technology that manufactures use for production in order to control the pollution, called “Best Available Technology (BAT)”. In this context, polluters are required by law to install BAT to control pollution. However, this approach could not deliver the efficient level or cost effectiveness of pollution controlled because when every business whether small or big business installs BAT, it would impose high MCC for small businesses and low MCC for big businesses. Thus, it will create inequity between small and big

Open Document