Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical appraisal of qualitative research
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research methods
Inclusivity and diversity in schools theory and practice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical appraisal of qualitative research
Critique and Limitations Cited by Researchers
The studies reviewed were qualitative in nature, therefore they are considered subjective. Berry (2008) made a statement regarding author bias noting the inherent weakness of qualitative analysis. The author sought to counter this weakness by quantifying test units through the use of computer software programs.
Both Cook et al. (2007) and Gojkovic (2007) suggest future validation of the rating scale should involve observation of student-teacher interactions. They also suggest rewording the prompts in order to yield greater variance in the teacher ratings. Further research opportunities are also used to determine the reasons for teacher ratings of indifference toward included students as they are higher than those of students without disabilities. Additionally, further research could be conducted differently, including monitoring teachers’ attitudes toward all students throughout the school year, or examining the impact of specific events on teacher attitude.
In reviewing many studies several authors noted their research was limited due to location and small sample size. Cook et al. (2007) noted limitations including the location of the participants is very specific (e.g.,northeast Ohio) and test-re-test reliability is modest, therefore, caution should be taken when interpreting the results. Gojkovic (2007) also discussed the issue with small sample size. It was noted in the study that only a small number of subjects were used, and it was not an accurate sample of all teachers in Serbia. Daane et al. (2008) noted that a major limitation to their study was the low rate of participation from teachers. Researchers handed out a questionnaire to teachers and asked them t...
... middle of paper ...
...ght not have had access to the most up-to-date trainings (Short & Martin, 2005). Studies that took place in rural areas or in other countries (Short & Martin,2005; Gugur & Uzuner,2010; Gojkovic, 2007) all sampled teachers who do not have the most current knowledge about new teaching methods. These teachers worked in a small district that did not have money to send teachers to trainings, to bring trainers in to the schools, or worked in countries where special education laws are not as rigid as those in the United States. Teachers who have been in the classroom for several years can become complacent and not be open to new methods and ideas used in the classroom, but these are the teachers we need to reach out to the most. The more teachers who are willing to work with both general education and special education students, the better the classrooms will be.
Disproportionality, in special education, is the overrepresentation or under-representation of a particular population or demographic group relative to their presence in the overall student population (Ralabate, & Klotz, 2007). There are many factors thought to contribute to disproportionality: cultural differences, lack of appropriate assessment strategies, socioeconomic status, race, and gender (Kanaitsa, 2010).
In modern times, special education refers to individualized instruction provided by school districts that fit the needs of a student’s exceptionality (Turnbull, Turnbull, Wehmeyer & Shogren, 2013). Special education is a rewarding field that encompasses the success of all learners with exceptionalities. Consequently, professionals in this discipline have to exhibit characteristics such as patience, ardor, and empathy. These individuals also have to be “self-aware culturally,” and by meeting that idea, they have to “become aware of [their] stereotypes, biases, and prejudices” (Turnbull et al., 2013, p. 74).
My personal philosophy of special education drives not from teaching in the field, but from, observations, and personal experience, and the workshops I attended. I have had the opportunity to work with individuals with special needs in many different settings, all this help cultivate my knowledge in handling the needs of the special needed student. Special needs students have the ability to learn, to function, to grow, and most importantly to succeed. The difference comes into how they learn or how they need to be taught. There are as many beliefs about the "hows" as there are teachers and each of us forms our own philosophy through our experiences and research. As a student in a special education teachers’ program, learners with special needs includes all students in special education programs in the public school system or other appropriate settings. However, the students I would like to focus on in my career are students with learning disabilities and therefore when thinking about learners with special needs, my mind focuses on this population.
My personal philosophy on special education begins with this firm conviction, I believe all children are “uniquely and wonderfully” made, and regardless of their disability, posse unique gifts and talents. My philosophy of special education has developed, not from just being a general education teacher for many years, and a graduate student in special education, but also from being blessed to be a parent of a special needs child. I believe that every child deserves to have the best possible education, regardless of their disabilities or challenges. It is our responsibility, as special education teachers, to not focus on a student’s disabilities and challenges, but rather focus and develop their personal gifts and talents, in an environment
Two years ago, I embarked on a journey that would teach me more than I had ever imagined. As a recent college graduate, I was thrilled to finally begin my teaching career in a field I have always held close to my heart. My first two years as a special education teacher presented countless challenges, however, it also brought me great fulfillment and deepened my passion for teaching students with special needs. The experiences I have had both before and after this pivotal point in my life have undoubtedly influenced my desire to further my career in the field of special education.
Disproportionate identification of minority students in special education is a major concern in schools today. This paper describes the issues in the assessment process with minority students and how we have arrived at a situation where minorities are being misdiagnosed into special education programs. Additionally, several legal cases are mentioned which show numerous actions and rulings that have tried to correct the disproportionate identification in special education. Some of the legal cases discussed include Larry P. v Riles, Diana v. State Board of Education, and Guadalupe v. Tempe Elementary School, which all significantly impacted special education today. Additionally, the Individual with Disabilities Education Act has enforced that minority groups must receive an equal education in the least restrictive environment possible. It is our duty as teachers and citizens to abide by these laws and find different ways to assess and correct the disproportionality of minority groups that exists today.
The government’s primarily goal is to close the achievement gap between special education students and general education students. In October of 2001, before the No Child Left Behind was put into action, President Bush appointed a commission called The Presidents Commission on Excellence in Special Education (PCESE). The purpose of this commission was to bring together 100 experts to evaluate the special education system. In conclusion, the commission could not agree more with President Bush that the special education system needed radical reform (Kauffman, 2004 p. 1). One of the main changes that the commission wanted to see was the achievement gap between special education students and general education students. The PCESE states, “The ultimate test of the value of special education is that, once identified, children close the achievement gap with their peers” (Kauffman, 2004 p. 4). I’m assuming the word peer means the same age child in general education. I don’t see how they expect students with a mental disability to be able to learn just has fast as general education students. I mean that’s what closing the gap means. “The gap to which the PCESE refers is simply not closable for reasons obvious to anyone with a rudimentary understanding of statistics and disability” (Kauffman, 2003 p. 3).
Besharov, Douglas. "Teachers Performance: A Review ." Journal of Policy Analyis and Management (2006): 1-41.
I have been a Special Education Para-Educator for eleven years now. My decision to do this was based on the needs of my family and kids. When my last child was born, the doctors did not think that he would make it. He had a heart malfunction and was born with RSV and Von Villibrantds disease (which I did not find out until he was three); those factors lead me to want to work with special education kids, knowing that I could make a difference.
During the late 1980’s and 1990’s the number of children with learning disabilities receiving special education services grew rapidly, but during 1998 and 2007 the number of children classified as having a LD has declined by 7% (Cortiella, 2009). “In 2007, 59% of students with LD spent 80% or more of their in-school time in general education classrooms. In 2000, that figure was just 40%” (Cortiella, 2009). In addition, students with disabilities are spending more time with students in traditional classroom settings. According to the Department of Education, “approximately 6 million children (roughly 10 percent of all school-aged children) receive special education services” (Pardini, 2011).
The number of children with special educational needs and disability (SEND) in England is over 1.2 million with over 230,000 having statements or education, health and care plans, a number which has continued to rise over the years (Department for education, 2016). Described by the department for education (2014, p.7) as “Children and young people with SEN all have learning difficulties or disabilities that make it harder for them to learn…”. Within this assignment I intend to outline the provision made for a SEN child in my attachment, which will be referred to as Child A.
As it relates to special education, modeling is beneficial for general education teachers. Most general education teachers do not receive the same specialized training as specialists. That being said, special education teachers have a duty of supplying the general education teacher with unknown information. This can be achieved through teacher mentoring. Teacher mentoring is a strategy to increase retention and bolster teacher quality, particularly in hard-to-staff areas such as special education (Moses, 2011). Special education positions are becoming increasingly scarce and it is imperative that the current special educators actively help general education teachers understand the policies of special education. At issue is whether practices in both special and general education teacher mentoring follow formal policies (Moses, 2011). This means that there are questions about the regulation of the mentoring process. To begin, special educators should make efforts to convey a message of collaboration to general education teachers. When conveying information, specialists should use empathic listening skills and have an authentic desire to help (Eccleston, 2010). Listening efforts should be put forth to make certain that all parties are heard and no person is
There is so much to know about special education that is separate from teaching in a traditional classroom. One thing that has really stood out to me is how many acronyms and terminology these teachers need to know. IEP, LRE, IDEA, FAPE, IFSP, and that is just to name a few (DREDF, 2017). Special education teachers, really need to be knowledgeable about a ton of things. Not only all of the terminology associated with special education, but about disabilities and the best way to go about educating a child with disabilities. When working with children in special education, there will be students of all ages with all kinds of disabilities and different ability levels that you are teaching. It is important to know about each child’s disabilities, what they should be learning and how they should be learning it. There may be times that are challenging education students with disabilities, but when a teacher properly educates themselves on all the aspects of special education and the resources out there for them, it may help make your classroom run more smoothly and easier to
Special Education is the education of students with special needs in a way that addresses the students’ individual differences and needs. And it is a specially designed instruction that meets the needs of students with disabilities as they attend to school, it also includes related services and supplementary aids and services. It helps every student with disabilities to have a chance to learn and showcase their own talent and intelligence. Without these students, Special Education wouldn’t be an organization or community who are willing to help these students with disabilities to learn and to attain their needs.
In recent years, the cliché image of a teacher has come under attach. Research has shown that teachers often work in an isolated setting in which they are considered experts in their specific area; however they often lack the support and equipment needed to do their jobs effectively. As a result, to the inadequate working environment new teachers often leave the profession within the first five years. These conditions often exist because the educational system fails to prepare our teachers with the proper tools and experience needed to do their job well (U.S. Department of Education, 2010).