Source Synthesis Essay

1498 Words3 Pages

Source 1 explains how instability is the greatest danger to establishment and tradition. It goes on to explain how change encourages radical and rebellious actions that can disrupt order. The problem displayed in the source is that change brings bad things such as revolutions and problems in the way the government is run. As a whole, the source disagrees with change and feels society is functioning perfectly as it is. The perspective of which would line up with those of a classical liberalist. Classical liberalists emphasize individual liberty, free markets, and limited government intervention in the economy and society. Classical liberalism generally supports gradual and organic change, rather than rapid or radical change. This view is based …show more content…

That is change within society. In all three sources, it seems that the society that they are living in is more conservative and lacks progressive change. The main issue that was discussed in all three of these sources is the role that government plays in society. Each source takes a different view on government. Sources 1 and 3 agree on more. Those sources share similar political values. What are Reactionaries? Which is a political ideology that seeks to return to a previous era or social order. Reactionaries believe that societal changes, particularly those brought about by progressive movements, have weakened the social order and should be reversed. In source 1, the main point the source was trying to make is that change brings about revolution and radicalism. The source believes change brings out the worst in people. That within liberal society, maintaining the status quo keeps things running smoothly without interference. So the role of government needs to be minimal and not interfere. The source believes that if the government doesn't interfere, then society runs smoothly. In source 2 the man holding the sign is fighting back against Reactionaries. Reactionaries support more conservative ideas and less progressive. The man wants to see change for his sake. In the society where the man lives, there may not be many social programs or benefits for homeless people, and he wants the government to make significant changes. That people in his situation will be cared for and healthier. Source 3 depicts a society that has bare bones minimal government. It is similar to Source 1 in their beliefs of little government but takes some ideas to an extreme. They believe that only the strong should survive and the world doesn't change for anyone, so the weak must die. They say that once man started interfering in the natural order, we “keep alive and breed the unfit”. Man interfering in the natural order refers to the government

More about Source Synthesis Essay

Open Document