More handpicked essays just for you.
Mandatory military service pros
Impact of military service on society
Effectiveness of mandatory military service
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Should men be required to sign-up for the draft? The military draft under the law states that all males, U.S. Citizens, and male's aliens are required to register for the draft; when turning 18 (abc news). However, those who fail to register before turning 26 will be prosecuted, become ineligible for federal financial aid, citizenship, federal job training, and federal jobs (abc news). Although men are required to sign-up for the draft; however, they should not be force to register for the military draft. A male cannot be prepared for the draft, it should be voluntarily, and it is fair that women should not be able to register for the draft. The draft can put a male in a position in which they are not prepared to be in. The military requires a person to be prepared for the hardships he has to endure while fighting. Not only the person that is being drafted is not prepared, their family is not prepared also. Most families are not prepared to make changes at the last minute. For instant, not being able to hear or see their love one or ones on a daily basis anymore. Families that do not know if their love one would survive or not, can become stressful. If the …show more content…
Women are not as strong fighters as men are. Drafting women will create a weaker military because they are not built to fight against men. Some women are physically capable of being in the military but the majority are not. Men should not be forced to register for the draft. Some men are not prepared for the military draft, the military should be voluntarily, and women shouldn't be required to register for the draft. If men are forced to draft into the military they are not physically or mentally prepared to be drafted. In fact, in today's world, if we were to go to war the military has enough troops to
The military is trying to find new ways to recognize the fact that women now fight in the country’s wars. In 2011 the Military Leadership Diversity Commission recommended that the Department of Defense remove all combat restrictions on women. Although many jobs have been opened for women in the military, there is still 7.3 percent of jobs that are closed to them. On February 9, 2012, George Little announced that the Department of Defense would continue to reduce the restrictions that were put on women’s roles. The argument that “women are not physically fit for combat” is the most common and well-researched justification for their exclusion from fighting units. It has been proven if women go through proper training and necessary adaptations, they can complete the same physical tasks as any man. Though there seem to be many reasons from the exclusion of women in the military, the main ones have appeared to be that they do not have the strength to go through combat, would be a distraction to the men, and that they would interrupt male bonding and group
These men would register with the Selective Service therefore they could be found easily in a time of need. The draft required these young men to sign up to serve their country involuntarily because it was to benefit the country, to make it easier
Men have always been looked upon as the leading sex. Looking back through history women have been the ones who take care of the home and children, while men are the ones who work and go to war. However in recent years there’s no doubt that women have become much more equal in the work force. Nevertheless men are still the ones who are forced to fight our wars when the time calls for it. Many think that women should be entirely equal to men having their choice to be drafted taken away but the fact is that they are physically at a disadvantage, too emotionally oriented, and the increase of female presence would have a more negative impact in the military in the way of social interactions.
Over forty years has passed since the United States inducted the last draftee through the Selective Service System. The Selective Service System is an independent agency of the United States, which gives the President the right or power to conscript men for military service. There have been different Acts passed by congress since 1917 that require men of various ages to register for service. Although, the name of each Act and the age requirements of the registries changed, the Acts were all similar in nature. They all gave the President the right to call men to war when he deemed necessary. In January 1973, Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird announced the creation of the all-volunteer service, retracting the need for the draft (GAO.gov). Under current law, all men between the ages of 18-25 must register within 30 days of their 18th birthday, however this information is used mostly for recruitment purposes and in case of any future crisis. There has been much controversy over this matter since the Vietnam War, when people started to realize the draft was unfair due to loopholes and draft exemptions making the draft unfair for working men. At one point in time the military draft may have been necessary, but today’s all-volunteer military has eliminated the need for a draft.
In “Combating Sexism: Woman and the Military Draft” writer Danielle Harris address the issues of women's inequality in the draft by proving that “American men and woman must carry equal responsibility” on the battlefield. As the military has changed its rules against genders many Americans have questioned the role of woman in today's society. A bill was passed that requires women to register in the draft, although, the likelihood of another draft happening is unlikely this opportunity is being used to highlight the discrimination of women. Some agree that women should be drafted as long as they meet the physical requirements of the military. Others disagree saying, that drafting woman is “immoral”. The biggest concern of drafting woman in the military is pregnancy. This issue would be resolved if the military made contraceptives more available to the woman. It is disrespectful to say that allowing women in the military is like “drafting] our daughters”. Many have fought and died to keep this country safe, in fact, “women already make up a significant amount of the united States armed
Imagine a big war has suddenly broke out with America and another country. The military suddenly realizes that in order to better their army and be stronger, they need more people to join and fight along with them. The military decides their needs to be a draft. However, men are the only ones eligible to be apart of the draft. Should this be something that should be changed with the military? Should women also be apart of the draft?
There are plenty of arguments for why the draft is wrong and unlawful, or even unconstitutional. When it comes down to basics, sending people involuntarily to war does sound pretty far from freedom of choice, but there is more to it than that. Understanding that it is a free country is one thing, but freedom comes at a price. Everyone wants to be free but not everyone realizes that there are times when we must fight to maintain our well-earned freedom. It is impossible in some cases to fight a full- blown war with just a volunteer army, and if it threatens our freedom, than we must fight the war with volunteers and draftees alike. In technicality, it may be wrong, but realistically, there are many times when a draft really is needed, and if run the correct way, it can be very effective.
A draft starts when there is a major crisis and extra troops are needed for combat. The draft only calls men to duty in a certain order in which they registered. This is called the lottery. Only when Congress passes and then the president signs legislation, the draft can begin. After the Vietnam War was completely over congress felt the draft should be put to an end. The draft was finally put to an end in 1973 by congress.
The draft is something young men fear and crave. Some fear they will lose everything, die or just not be the same if they get picked. I have met young men who cannot be in the military due to family issues, so the draft would come as a blessing. The draft is also very random, so both of those boys' chances of getting picked is also very slim. The draft reminds me of The Reaping from The Hunger Games, we pick your name out of a bowl and the magic of selection will decide if you go or not. Then your skill set will determine how long you live in battle. May the odds be ever in your favor, and don't forget that you're and accountant and have no hand-eye coordination! There are plenty of volunteers in America that will gladly serve our country if we need more soldiers, I personally think the wars have past their expiration date, and there are other jobs people can do
If there was a draft, there would be a lot more men and women out there fighting to keep our country safe so that we can continue to lay down at night and not be afraid of what might happen to us when we do. Our military is strong, but if there was a specific number of men joining every year or so, our numbers would be higher, therefore increasing our strength. Being in the military is something to be proud of, and those that join on their own are good people, but anyone that goes out and fights, draft or not, is still a good person and should have our respect. Most people see commercials on television about the armed forces and think that it might be a good thing to go do, I know I have, but some might not put any more work into it after they see it the first time. Having a draft would get rid of that part of them that doesn’t want to get up off the couch and
As Ken Adachi, the editor of ?Educate Yourself,? reports, a new draft will include BOTH men and women. While at various points in history the United States military has operated effectively and efficiently with the draft, reinstating the draft would contradict the ideals of freedom and patriotism that the United States stands for and is supposedly fighting for.
Ever since the first war involving America started, there have been countless discussions on who should fight for our country. There are talks of age, gender, and if the service should be voluntary or not. In America, serving is voluntary, although, in other countries, it is not. The service should stay voluntary in America because if not, it would go against freedom and it would be a source of newfound problems within our country. Also, if youth took off two years of their lives to serve, they would not gain experience to work in the fields that need more work force.
"The soldier is the Army. No army is better than its soldiers. The Soldier is also a citizen. In fact, the highest obligation and privilege of citizenship is that of bearing arms for one’s country” (-General George S. Patton Jr). Here within our borders we are the lucky ones, we have been blessed with the pleasure of so many brave men and women; to volunteer in the world's greatest military; and put their lives on the line for something that they believe is a moral obligation. But, think of some other countries, that have conscription (the practice of ordering people by law to serve in the armed forces) laws. We as a nation have some laws on conscription, and if you are male and above the age of 18 you have already signed the slip of paper stating that in the time of war; if our great nation re-instated the draft then there is a great chance you will be serving on the frontline of the next Great War. This brings me to my first topic of this page, is it ethical to have a draft? My second topic that I will discuss will be on if it is morally acceptable to "draft dodge". What I mean on the second topic is if you have a right; that morally allows you to not go fight in the war.
This evidence was uncovered from (Thought Catalog), men on their 18th birthday have to enlist themselves to the government in case there is a war they may be selected to fight. Women do not have to do this act by law, but then many complain that they want to fight. More excuses come with this that radical feminists like to use such as men can fight but women can not. The drafting process should be able to be open to women. If you look at history some women were the greatest fighters in wars. Here are some examples of these women from mental floss Lise Børsum Refugee Smuggler, Barbara Lauwers: Propaganda Warrior, Annie Fox Pearl Harbor Nurse, Violette Szabo Fearless Spy, Hannie Schaft, Dutch Resistance Fighter, and Felice Schragenheim Underground Operative. Those are just some examples but there are many more besides these. Some of these excuses that radical feminists say can get really out of proportion. There are so much evidence to prove most of these statements
Many agree, that in certain military occupations, women can function at the same level as men. The controversy about having women fighting with men in wars is the fact that they have a different physical structure, deal with stress and emotions differently , are more susceptible to injury and just don't have the killer instinct necessary to get the job done. Although the last statement might appear to be a stereotype, most women would not be capable of supporting the demanding rigors of war-like situations. It would be a great mistake to allow women in these stressful and dangerous situations.