Rhetorical Appeals In Civil Rights Speech

1054 Words3 Pages

Civil Rights Essay One of the darkest times in American history includes the time of slavery. Injustice, rights of men, the thought of being “equal,” was all questioned during the time of slavery. The fight for freedom became the main goal of African Americans, to help them with this fight for freedom were three activists. The three activists included; Minister Martin Luther King, and younger activists, Malcolm X, and Stokely Carmichael. These civil right activists all had one goal in mind; equality and fair treatment for black people. While all three activists shared this common goal, their means of achieving it differed. In Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and Stokely Carmichael’s speech different rhetorical strategies and appeals were used …show more content…

In both speeches rhetorical appeals were used. In the speech “I have a dream, “pathos was used to connect emotionally with his audience. Blacks are described as being “crippled” by the “manacles of segregation” and “chains of discrimination.” The use of such diction, possess an emotional tone causing pathos. The use of these words make the audience think that blacks are being punished for some crime they committed, but the “crime” is just the fact that they are black. King states while everyone in the world are in an “ocean of material prosperity,” blacks are on a “lonely island of poverty.” This …show more content…

In the speech “the ballot or the bullet,” Malcom uses logos stating “If they draft you, they send you to Korea and make you face 800 million Chinese. If you can be brave over there, you can be brave right here. These odds aren't as great as those odds. And if you fight here, you will at least know what you're fighting for." This like an eye opener to the audience persuading them to fight for freedom. Malcolm also states: "We're not even as far up as we were in 1954. We're behind where we were in 1954. There's more segregation now than there was in 1954. There's more racial animosity, more racial hatred, more racial violence today in 1964, than there was in 1954. Where is the progress?" This tells the audience it is time for a change because what we have been doing is obviously not working. He says all of this in hopes that people will take the initiative and fight back for what they want.” If violence is wrong in America, violence is wrong abroad. If it is wrong to be violent defending black women and black children and black babies and black men, then it is wrong for America to draft us and make us violent abroad in defense of her.” The use of logos here is explaining to his audience why violence

Open Document