More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion on why teachers shouldn't be armed
Persuasive research papers
Conclusion on why teachers shouldn't be armed
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion on why teachers shouldn't be armed
The rhetorical situation of this article “Arming teachers? I’m a Teacher and Hunter”.The author of this is a respectful teacher, husband, and father is writing about arming teachers.In this article, author, Glen Young, is writing a persuasive article convincing his audience that a teacher who is also a hunter is against arming teachers.When clarifying who he was to the audience he mentioned his views very suddenly.”I do not want a gun in my classroom”.In this quote, he quickly announced his views on the matter by explaining who and what he believes in.As you keep reading he keeps making more remarks on history opinionated view on arming teachers.”Teachers with guns will not put an end to would be shooters”.He again makes it clear that his opinion as a hunter and gun owner is not expected.He doesn't want teachers being armed.This author's message, audience, and who the speaker is, was very easy to find because the author was so opened to his readers.
Eugene V. Debs, the United State’s most influential union leader and avid socialist gives light to many issues including presidency, systems of society, and most importantly the unemployed in his speech “The Issue”. Debs was imprisoned in the 1890s for illegally encouraging a railroad strike, he also was sentenced to 10 years for his discouragement to the United States’ involvement in World War I. Debs has been a remarkable figure in the socialist party and had influenced so many. In Eugene Debs’ speech, Debs’ uses rhetorical appeal to relate to and convince his audience of the “issues” in the United
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
“The Onion’s” mock press release on the MagnaSoles satirical article effectively attacks the rhetorical devices, ethos and logos, used by companies to demonstrate how far advertisers will go to convince people to buy their products. It does this by using manipulative, “scientific-sounding" terminology, comparisons, fabrication, and hyperboles.
In order to convey his argument O’Mara must first gain his reader’s trust. To do this, the author establishes his authority and his credibility through the editorial note, to show that he is knowledgeable to speak about the problem. Mark O’Mara’s authority checks out because he is a criminal defense attorney and he writes about “issues related to race, guns and self-defense in the context of the American criminal justice system”. So he is exposed to lot criminal acts some of which may be gun-related and so he knows how serious it is or the statistics on of which the mass shooting have increased. O’Mara appears sympathetic to his cause, as he uses facts based of emotions to make the reader feel and understand the point he is trying to make. To further credit his sources, he cites them from other notable news outlets like ABC and CNN news. The use of ethos strengths his argument because it gives the reader the confidence to believe in what the author is saying, as opposed to an author whose work is self-published and without any credentials. But O’Mara accusatory tone that implies Americans are don’t care about the shooting, drives away his American readers because it may be
When the professor Greg Hampikian decided to write “When may I shoot a student” He was trying express his own opinion to the Idaho State Legislature about the bill that allows for guns to be on the college campus of Boise State University. Greg tells us why he thinks this bill is really not needed by saying “I think we can all agree that guns don’t kill people, people with guns do.” He goes on to make many different examples of how the bill might be misunderstood and why it would be pointless to add the bill that will allow people to have a gun on campus. Greg is wanting to know why the Idaho State Legislature would create a problem when there is not a problem in the first place. Greg goes on being ironic when he is pointing out that the only crime on the campus is when students cheat on a test or experiment with drugs, he even go as far to say that the campus has a murder rate of zero.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
Last month a horrific incident occurred taking the lives of, news reporter Alison Parker, and camera man Adam Ward. Journalist for the New York Times, Nick Kristof, wrote an article titled “Lessons from the Virginia Shooting” in which he states his opinion on gun control. Kristof, is a human and woman’s rights activist, but also a father and husband which would explain his concern on this topic. He believes we need better firearm restrictions in order to reduce death due to gun violence. This has been a controversial issue for a while, but I believe it had more attention brought to it when the live shooting occurred in Virginia on August 26th. I personally think Kristof wrote this article because he has children and a wife, so it’s normal for
The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.
“The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.” The film begins with a scene of two men surrounded by fire and dead bodies on a boat in San Pedro, California. The two men talk for a while, then a mystery man shoots a man named Keaton, then sets him on fire. FBI agents appear the next day to investigate the crime scene and interrogate the two survivors of 27 killed men. One survivor is a Hungarian is describing a man named Kieser Söze to a sketch artist. The other survivor is Verbal Kent who is telling the police everything he knows for immunity. When Kent begins his story, it fades into six weeks ago in New York City where the NYPD gathers five different criminals that are suspected
The article “Guns are killing high school kids across America at alarming rates” begin by sharing a video of a message from a senior, Sam Zeif, who was a survivor of the Florida school shooting. In the video Sam started off by explaining how the emotions that was felt during the shooting, how regretful and worrisome Sam was for family members and friends. Then Sam continued with explaining the fear that tagged along with Sam and Sam’s friends after the school shooting, how unsafe Sam felt when going back to school or walking down a street. Then Sam shared a personal experience of seeing a man purchasing a deadly weapon with an expired ID in just five minutes. With the support of Sam’s deceased friend, who was killed during the school shooting,
Sarah Chadwick, a Parkland shooting survivor, recently made a video titled “Students Have Had Enough”, mimicking Dana Loesch’s “NRA Has Had Enough” video, a commercial for NRA TV. The two draw obvious parallels in format, but their rhetoric offers plenty of comparisons. Loesch, a spokeswoman for the NRA, represents conservatives “fed up with [the leftist] agenda” Chadwick advocates for progressive Americans who wish to see gun reform. Both speakers have large fallacies regarding context and evidence, but extremely effective emotional appeals.
Imagine a society where education isn’t entirely dependent upon the merits of one’s personal knowledge. Where the learning environment is utilized for personal development and growth rather than competition and separation. A sanctuary composed of unity and equity among peers. A place where college isn’t the only goal, but rather personal identity and initiative are established along the way. Such a society, fully embodies Baldwin’s ideology regarding education, and the prejudices therein. In his speech, “A Talk to Teachers” Baldwin delivers a compelling argument, in which he criticizes the problems and prejudices within the educational system in his day. However, through his sagacious philosophies and eye-opening opinions, Baldwin manifests the cruel, unspoken truth within his speech, that the hindrances and prejudices experienced in his day are still existent in 2016.
As American’s we place a high level of importance on attending school and receiving a certain level of education. Across the world, the recommendations for attending school vastly differ based on the culture of the society. In America, we require our children to attend school until they are almost of legal age, push high school graduates to attend college and we constantly emphasize structured learning. Many children in today’s world lack many skills that would allow them to “teach” themselves outside of school leading to an increased interest in televisions, computers, and phones. Technology has taken away society’s attention away from independent learning such as reading, writing, and outside experiences. John Taylor Gatto’s emotional voice in his writing “Against School” has allowed me reveal my psychological voice regarding the educational system.
In this notable Ted Talk video "Do schools kill creativity?", Sir Ken Robinson discusses how public education systems demolish creativity because they believe it is essential to the academic growth and success of students. Robinson created a broad arrange of arguments to persuade the viewers to take action on this highly ignored issue, and he primarily focuses on how important creativity is. There are classes within schools that help utilize creativity, but they are not taken seriously by adults in society. Therefore, the value of creative knowledge decreases. Robinson uses an unusual combination of pathos and ethos to make an enjoyable dispute for implementing an education system that nurtures rather than eats away at creativity.
I believe that the purpose of education is to produce the next generation of leaders who are intelligent and have great character. This idea is supported in the article “The Purpose of Education” by Martin Luther King. Martin Luther King Jr. was a civil rights activist who fought for black and white people to have equal rights in America. He writes about the true purpose, and meaning of education in the article by saying, “Education must enable one to sift and weigh evidence, to discern the true from the false, the real from the unreal, and the facts from the fiction (MLK1).” This quote from the article explains that being academically educated is very important. It will help people stand up, be a leader, and take charge to make the world a better place for everyone. That gallant leader will argue against the fallacy, lies,