Revisiting Benjamin Bloom's Closing Achievement Gap

983 Words2 Pages

Running head: CLOSING ACHIEVEMENT GAPS: REVISTING BENJAMIN S. BLOOM’S

Guskey, T. R. (2007). Closing achievement gaps: revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom 's “learning for mastery”. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(1), 8-31.

The author begins the article by first acknowledging the existence of achievement gaps within the school system, a problem that has plagued the country for some time now. As a result of education reform and the desire for change to take place within the education system, political leaders and programs like No Child Left Behind, has shifted its focus once again to closing the achievement gap. Given the latest changes in education, schools are now mandated to submit a breakdown of student achievement results based on the student’s …show more content…

Bloom’s research on reducing achievement gaps as providing awareness and strategies to common problems associated with achievement gaps. In 1960, Bloom began his research on individual differences in school learning, when he noticed that instructors provided few differences in the way they taught students. He observed that teachers did not accommodate for individual differences but taught every student the same and offered students the same amount of time to grasp concepts. As a result, students that had minimal trouble with this method of instruction were ultimately successful, but majority of the students who found the instruction methods to be unsuitable were not as successful as their peers, thus acquiring less information. In an effort to produce favorable results and diminish differences in student achievement, Bloom decided that because teachers serve students with different needs and learning abilities that a variety of teaching methods must be applied to instruction with the intent on the teacher meeting the needs of every student in her classroom. While looking for ways to solve this issue, Bloom thought about three possible resolutions to the problem. Providing students with a tutor to assist with student understanding, structuring concepts into instructional units, and using the results from assessments to provide feedback to students. Based on this approach, Bloom suggested that all three components be included as the framework …show more content…

The author than describes common misperception and misunderstandings of Bloom’s mastery learning. Some educators feel that the implementation of mastery learning is too time consuming and can take the place of valuable instruction time. In response to the argument, the author admits that at first the process can be lengthy and that many teachers that are implementing the program in their classroom find that they are behind with units compared to other teachers who don’t participate in mastery learning, but teachers can make up for instructional time missed by doing away with lesson reviews prior to administering formative assessments or adjusting the curriculum and or pacing

Open Document