Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast qualitative and quantitative research
Compare and contrast qualitative and quantitative research
Compare and contrast qualitative and quantitative research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Results Overview
The purpose of this research is to determine if there is a link between supplemental media from Khan Academy and student academic performance. Furthermore, the research also seeks to determine the attitudes of teachers and students towards toward Khan Academy, particularly during the intervention period. The results are parsed and analyzed with the intention of providing clear conclusions as well as reasonable answers to research questions. First, the general findings of the data will be presented. These will be general conclusions derived from detailed analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data. The detailed analysis of the quantitative data is presented in terms of increasing complexity beginning with averages
…show more content…
Quantitative Student Assessment Data. Student quantitative assessment data is broken into seven sections to most clearly present the data. Beginning with the most general conclusions and ending with specific hypothesis testing. Mean average. Both the control group and intervention group of students had initial baseline assessments in the failing range, though this was not surprising considering the intervention specifically measured students that had not yet begun algebra instruction and likely only had pre-algebra instruction to guide them in completing the assessments. The largest improvement in test scores for both groups was between the baseline assessment test and the first test after the initial block of algebra instruction. Between the baseline and first test the control group seemed to improve more, though this improvement could be explained by regression to the mean considering the control group had lower initial scores. After the initial improvement, the intervention group improved more and improved more consistently than the control group. At the last data point, two weeks after the intervention, the intervention group had an average score approximately three and a half points higher than the control group (see Figure …show more content…
The standard deviation of scores decreased across both groups during the intervention, but spiked at the post-test. Given that the post-test was given two weeks after the end of the intervention, it seems plausible that increased algebra ability and increased familiarity with the assessment test caused the difference between the best and worse scores to decrease, but that this effect reversed after two weeks passed with no algebra instruction. It was also discovered through discussion with participating students that many of the highest scoring students continued using Khan Academy of their own volition outside of
Even with material being taught incessantly, standardized tests can not accurately measure a student’s ability. The tests are “single-target—meaning that every student, no matter what level of achievement or ability, course selection, or cu...
In the previous chapters I discussed the problem of the lack of healthy eating promotion programs in schools are leaving parents and students uneducated about how to purchase healthy items which is leading to childhood obesity. I also discussed how the problem is being addressed, as well as the theory of social constructionism. In this chapter, I will discuss the specific methodology I plan to use and the three different types of data collection I plan to employ to carry out my study. This study will use a qualitative approach to study and address the issue of the lack of healthy eating promotion in schools. The three types of data collection I plan to use are: direct observation, focus groups and a questionnaire. These methods will be clarified later in this chapter.
Today students go to school from K-12 earning their education and take a standardized test during their junior or senior years (sometimes sophomore year). The SAT (Scholastic Aptitude Test) and other standardized test are used by colleges across the world to determine if a student is ready for college. As a result, there are some individuals that disagree with the use of standardized testi...
Current educational policy and practice asserts that increased standardized student testing is the key to improving student learning and is the most appropriate means for holding individual schools and teachers accountable for student learning. Instead, it has become a tool solely for summarizing what students have learned and for ranking students and schools. The problem is standardized tests cannot provide the information about student achievement that teachers and students need day-to-day. Classroom assessment can provide this kind of information.
Standardized tests have been a scourge of student life in America for more than fifty years. Throughout the United States, high school students prepare for months for the day in which they have to take out their No. 2 pencils, to endure four everlasting hours of bubbling-in answers. The ACT, American College Testing, and its counterpart, the SAT, Scholastic Assessment Test, are known as the high school exit exams, in which they have become one of the largest determining factors in the college-admissions process. Both standardized tests judge a student 's performance, in which it measures how well students learned skills to meet state standards. Although standardized tests are meant to measure what one learns in high school in order to determine
Described below is a critical appraisal of a qualitative article by Lisa Booth using the frame-work suggested by Ryan, Coughlan and Cronin 2007 to establish its believability, robustness, credibility and integrity (Ryan, Coughlan & Cronin, 2007).
A study on fourth and eighth-grade students throughout the years, gives detailed workup on how the students performed on math assessments and many factors that played a role. When tested; students had three levels that classified them in the math sections which were basic, proficient and advanced. These classifications determined where the fourth and eighth graders fall after assessment. There was a slight increase with eighth graders in all sections but only by minimum amount one or two percent. The fourth graders were very consistent and only increase a few times by one or two percent. In 2011, eighty-two percent of the four graders tested had at least basic knowledge, where they could compute the difference of two 4-digit numbers.
Standardized testing is not an effective way to test the skills and abilities of today’s students. Standardized tests do not reveal what a student actually understands and learns, but instead only prove how well a student can do on a generic test. Schools have an obligation to prepare students for life, and with the power standardized tests have today, students are being cheated out of a proper, valuable education and forced to prepare and improve their test skills. Too much time, energy, and pressure to succeed are being devoted to standardized tests. Standardized testing, as it is being used presently, is a flawed way of testing the skills of today’s students.
Solley, B. A. (2012). On Standardized Testing: An ACEI Position Paper. Childhood Education, 84(1), 31-37. Retrieved December 3, 2012, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2007.10522967
In this paper, I will define quantitative and qualitative research methods and provide examples in the context of social issues which will hopefully provide insight into how this methods are properly applied.
Students have been known to complain when there is a change or loss in what they are used to. Student’s begin to wondering what their tuition brings them when they could have just simply surf the web for videos like khan academy. Introducing a new model to a class can be tricky, this could also mean additional work and new skills for the students and instructor. For teachers a flipped classroom changes the role for instructors, many instructors are used to teaching in front of the class lecture based. For student’s not ever child can pay for electronic device to watch the video’s from home.
This essay intends to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the quantitative and qualitative approaches to research which addresses young people and bullying using two journal articles. The first article (quantitative) aims to “establish the relationship between recurrent peer victimisation and the onset of reported symptoms of anxiety or depression in the early teen years” (Bond et al. 2001, p. 480) while the second article (qualitative) aims to “investigate the nature of teenage girls’ indirect aggression” (Owens et al. 2000, p. 70).The two articles will be critically compared in terms of research design, methods used, approach to data analysis, reported results and the plausibility and appropriateness of the conclusions and recommendations posed. The aim of this essay is thus to evaluate and assess the methods of social science research currently undertaken in published research.
Standardized tests are used to evaluate a student’s performance, however, tests do not take external factors into account. This already means that tests are often inaccurate methods of measuring a students academic potential. Also, the tests do a disservice to students as they evaluate their proficiency at a time of testing, rather than their growth and improvement over the course of the year. The tests have become an outdated method of challenging students and only have negative impacts at this point. The tests develop high levels of stress in students, which is not healthy for an individual during the most important development years of their lives. Eliminating these tests will assist students in the long run as they can accommodate more time towards learning information rather than stressing over a single test. By replacing tests with more in-class lessons students will be free of constant stress and still learn the curriculum. Research shows that students are unable to remember information on standardized tests in the long run, therefore, by spending more time learning and understanding information, students are able to have a better understanding of topics. Therefore, by removing standardized tests students will be provided with a better, more effective, and fair educational
Qualitative and Quantitative study designs both can be beneficial in research design. They both provide valuable options for researchers in the field. These techniques can either be used separately in a research study or they can be combined to achieve maximum information. This paper will define the terms qualitative and quantitative; describe the similarities and differences between each; discuss how qualitative and/or quantitative research designs or techniques could be used in the evaluation of my proposed research; and discuss why linking analysis to study design is important.
The purpose of Chapter two is to review literature related to the major variables within the study. Two literature reviews were conducted. The first literature review examined the retention rates and low standardized test scores on Students taking Middle School Math. This follows the purpose of the conceptual framework, the Keller’s ARCS model(1987). Here, there will be literature related to inform the study that is related to the research design, intervention design, and measurement instruments. Lastly there will be a section on the Conceptual Framework.