Pros And Cons Of Texas Plural Executive

383 Words1 Page

The role of an executive branch is to carry out the law. Many states switched to the plural executive form of government because state governors were known for abusing their power when appointing friends to political positions or handing out favors when they requested. A plural executive system which means the power of a governor is limited and distributed among other government officials. Which means, that there is not an government official in Texas that has the solely responsible for the Texas Executive Branch. Some of the members of the Texas Plural Executive and their roles are Lieutenant Governor serves as the presiding officer is first in line of succession for governor, is elected to 4 years terms by the public with no terms limits. Attorney General serves as the lawyer for the state also represents the state on civil matters and is responsible for the interpretation of the …show more content…

Manages and administrate mineral leases and state lands. Comptroller of Public Accounts serves as the chief tax collector and accounting officer and is also responsible for certifying the biennial budget of the state. Is elected by the people to 4 years terms. Other members of the Texas Plural Executive are the Commissioner of Agriculture, Railroad commission, State Board of Education, Elected/Appointed Boards and Commissions, and Appointed Agency Directors. The pros and cons of having a plural executive system the con of this system is that it lacks cohesion, leading political officials chasing after many different goals. The governor has much less power to lead the group in any unified direction. As well, voting prevents governor bias, leaving voter not electing qualified candidates. While the pros are it prohibits the governor from abusing its power. As well the governor omits can be covered by the other officials. Therefore, distribution of the power to some extent enhances the quality of

More about Pros And Cons Of Texas Plural Executive

Open Document