Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of emotional intelligence in leaders
Effects of emotional intelligence in leaders
Organization leadership, moods and emotions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of emotional intelligence in leaders
Leadership Qualities of the President
Being the President of the United States is perhaps one of the most important professions in the world. It comes to no surprise then that there are certain leadership qualities that make the President not only stand out, but are fundamental for a successful term. Perhaps the most important would be the President’s ability of political skill in office. Equally important, is in how the President can handle his emotional intelligence when dealing with the many challenges that arise. Finally, having clear vision can be the grounds of making a successful President with a positive legacy.
Political skill is essential for facing situations that may arise in term, and being able to handle them with clarity, accuracy, and determination can make a President stand out. In fact, Lyndon Johnson showed great political skills in handling the office, shortly after Kennedy’s assassination, in that he was quick to maintain order, prowess, and had the ability to keep Congress in session (Greenstein 217-223). Those Presidents that lack political skills can face a variety of challenges from their
…show more content…
Being a President, emotional intelligence can make him stand out as an effective leader or one that is crippled by it. Having a President that has strong sense of self confidence and one that may have doubt but continues his plans and actions, demonstrates that that President is not ruled my negative emotional intelligence (Rove) An example of this would-be Eisenhower and his many accomplishments including keeping America peaceful during the Cold War times and balancing the budget of the United States multiple times. However, Presidents that showed negative emotional intelligence, have faced many troubles including former President Clinton whose actions of impulse, directly had a hand in his impeachment proceedings (Greenstein
Skowornek writes, “these presidents each set out to retrieve from a far distant, even mythic, past fundamental values that they claim had been lost in the indulgences of the received order, In this way, the order-shattering and order-affirming impulses of the presidency in politics became mutually reinforcing.” (Skowornek, 37, book). These presidents are in the best position not because they are exceptional at their job but because the time they came into office offered them the elasticity and authority to make new orders and be welcomed by the public because he is taking the country out of its troubles and challenges.
Choosing a president can be very challenging. There are many things we as citizens look for in a candidate. For example, goals, visions, etc. We always want what is best for our country and for our families. James D. Barber looks into one thing, which is the candidate’s character. This essay will explain James D. Barber’s theory. It will also criticize the placement of five presidents in the typology he has created.
The President should have knowledge, understanding and vision. He should measure each situation with cost-analysis mentality, only pursuing what can be accomplished successfully. The President is actively involved in acquisition of power. Using professional reputation and public prestige, the President can increase bargaining power. By building a record of success, the President can become more influential through presidential persuasion, in policy making, and conserve presidential power.
The presidency of the United Sates of America has been an evolving office since the term of our first president, George Washington. This evolution has occurred because of the changing times and the evolution of society itself, but also because of the actions of the men who have become president. Starting in the 20th century, most have referred to the presidency as the modern presidency due to changes in both a president's power and the way that the office itself is viewed. As the office of the president has evolved so has who can become president evolved. Yet, even today there are certain individuals who because of their gender or race have yet to hold the office of the presidency. The men that have been president in our modern era have all had faults and greatness, some having more of one than of the other. The modern presidency is an office that many aspire to, but that few hold. The evolution of the office of the presidency has been one from that of a traditional role to that of a modern role that is forever evolving.
A presidential leader fills many roles and his character and life experiences make great decisions for our Country. As a legislative leader, he is responsible for working with Congress to pass law and help meet the needs of the people. As Commander and Chief, he is head of the armed forces. And as a world leader, he is expected to work with foreign leaders and establish strengthened relationship. For this assignment, I invented a Presidential Candidate named James Peterson, who has the characteristics I believe would make an excellent president.
Many Presidents over the years have shown greatness through their leadership. Each has shown this in their individual way. It takes the ability to deal with whatever may come up, as far as politics are concerned, and handle it with care. Also it takes making a difference in society instead of just settling for the United States being ok as it is. The extra step that some take, separates the normal from the great. Lyndon B. Johnson was one of the Presidents who stood out by taking the extra step. LBJ showed presidential greatness through passing groundbreaking legislation and improving society.
The American Presidency is undoubtedly one of the most widely recognized popular icons throughout the world. Although to most foreigners or those who have never resided in the United States or know little of its history, the executive branch of government may seem to be as dull and unyielding as the rest of the American politics, for those few rare individuals who have taken the time to examine and closely scrutinize this office of the American political system and its recent history, quite the opposite will be said. Unlike Congressional or local elections where typically a number of individuals of the same ideological background must be elected in order for a particular issue to be addressed by the government, when it comes to the presidency, one person, although checked by various other divisions of the same government, has the power and responsibility to literally, as history has proven, change the world. The American people, "like all people everywhere, want to have our (political) cake and eat it too. We want a lot of leadership, but we are notoriously lousy followers" (Genovese). In other words the expectations the public has of the executive office are ever-changing since we demand that our leaders keep up with the evolving world around us and them. Throughout the past seventy eventful years alone, the American people's views, perceptions and demands of the Executive Office of American government have evolved simultaneously with the political and social events of that same time period.
When it comes to United States Presidents, everyone has an opinion of each president’s effectiveness. It takes character and talent to hold up to the stress of the White House. One aspect of a leader that measures their effectiveness is their capability to handle a crisis; another is their ability to make decisions for the betterment of whomever they lead, while still taking in all opinions. One example of an extremely effective president that successfully used those qualities was Abraham Lincoln.
Richard E. Neustadt, the author of Presidential Power, addresses the politics of leadership and how the citizens of the United States rate the performance of the president's term. We measure his leadership by saying that he is either "weak or "strong" and Neustadt argues that we have the right to do so, because his office has become the focal point of politics and policy in our political system. Neustadt brings to light three main points: how we measure the president, his strategy of presidential influence, and how to study them both. Today we deal with the President himself and his influence on government action. The president now includes about 2000 men and women, the president is only one of them, but his performance can not be measured without focusing on himself.
In this paper, I will be discussing someone who I believe to be a great leader, George W. Bush. I will be using material I have learned from my Survey of Leadership Theory class, such as preparing an analysis discussing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of George W. Bush. In addition, I will be discussing how three different leadership concepts discussed in my class also relate to George W. Bush with examples of each concept.
There is an importance of leaders to first analyze the impact of their emotional manifestation. Leaders should own emotional intelligence. Those leaders that don’t possess emotional int...
The president’s accumulation of personal power can make up for his lack of institutional powers. The president must act as the “lubricant” for the other sectors of government in order to preserve order and accomplish business. Neustadt emphasizes the president’s ability to forge strong personal relationships and his or her charisma, indicating that these characteristics affect the president’s ability to persuade. According to Neustadt, a successful president persuades the public, congress, and foreign powers to align their motives and views with him. Two presidents who validate this statement are Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. As two presidents who do not validate this statement, Neustadt cites George W. Bush and Richard Nixon.
B-Riggz for Prez 2020 When envisioning what a good president would possess people think of many different characteristics, attributions, and qualities. A good president should have perspective, integrity and have experience in politics as well as an education of government related aspects. A good president can mean many different things to many different people when it comes to their stance on controversial topics. This can also depend on their political party as well as their background and voting history.
I feel the ideal candidate for President should have strong military knowledge and at least some military experience. I believe he or she should be fair, strong and posses compassion. I support missile defense systems and homeland defense forces incase of an intrusion, but I believe there should be more training, the kind of training that the military have never encountered before. The president elect must be able to delegate power to train and equip troops properly and put them under proper rotations. Keeping the American people free and safe is of great importance. In my opinion, war should always be the last option, but I understand that sometimes there is no choice.
Amateur presidents on the other hand view the presidential role as one that fits him. An amateur president who assumes the role of a clerk is constantly occupied with strategies, strategies to complete one task and move on to the next. One of Neustadt’s primary examples of presidential clerkship is Harry S. Truman’s presidency. Neustadt claims that Truman “saw himself not as a man for whom the job was made, but as a man who had the job to do. He drew his confidence from seeing himself do it (Neustadt, p. 147). To a clerk, the position of the president has already been made. They are likened to professional presidents in that they exude confidence. However, their confidence draws from a different mindset. Truman was confident that he had the ability to do all the tasks that were required of him: make decisions, take initiatives, and be the “boss-and-spokesperson.” As a clerk, Truman did not allow self-interest overtake his responsibilities (Neustadt, p. 147). The idea of separating man from office is a key concept of the presidential clerk.