Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Romans'impact on the development of civilizations
Summary on julius caesar
Roman civilization legacy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Dear Fellow Senators, I am present today to share with you that I believe Julius Caesar should live. I support this opinion because Julius was one of the greatest generals and leaders in ancient history. Also, he made many improvements in society. Finally, Julius was considered a military genius. I assure you that after I am finished with this speech, you will support my position that Julius should live. My first reason is that Caesar was one of the greatest generals in history. He didn’t only lead armies and conquer land, but he was also very generous and gave land to the poor. Without him, Rome would have been in trouble, they could have possibly lost every war. Also, people praised Julius for his incredible leadership, they held celebrations and parties all for his victories. If people adored him this much, that obviously proves that he was a great general. …show more content…
In the article, Ancient Civilizations, the text states, “ As a Roman ruler, Caesar made many improvements. He put honest men in government positions. He made taxes fairer and gave land to the poor.” All of these things are important improvements, thanks to Julius, he changes society. He added more people into the senate, it stayed that way and became a tradition for Rome. If Julius didn’t make that change, the senate would be different. Our government could have possibly been different because since Rome won the Punic Wars, we have their type of government. My second reason is that Caesar made taxes more fair. This helped the society because it made it easier and more equal to pay taxes. Finally, he gave land to the poor and he granted citizenship to the people who weren't born in Rome. This shows that Julius is very honorable to everybody, he helped the people that their land got conquered and the poor now had land. Would you really want to banish him from the world when he is such a great
Caesar, who was seen as a great leader of Rome. This point of view has
They think he ruled by force and didn’t care for his people. These people basically see Caesar as just being a power-hungry leader. However, it is clear in the way he helps his people live a better life that Julius Caesar was in fact a true hero. If Caesar was a tyrant, he would have ruled by force and Rome would have had much stricter laws. Also, Julius Caesar would have been focused on getting absolute power and not leading a military into conquering territory. If he was really hungry for power, he could set rules to make life tough on Romans. Instead, he dedicated his time into making life better for all citizens, especially ones of the middle and lower classes. Therefore, Julius Caesar was clearly a hero to the Roman Empire.
He was making needed reforms and did good things for Rome. When they assassinated Caesar they opened a door to corruption and less order. While Caesar wasn’t in the Plebian class because of all his wealth and power, he made changes that many of them liked. Caesar was true to his people and that’s why he was well liked. He treated them all with respect. With such a well-liked leader assassination or murder of him will make many angry and without such reasoning the Conspirators are left in a troubled
For thousands of years people have been talking about the great powerful Caesar. He is one of the greatest known dictators known to people today mostly because of all of the things he was able to accomplish during his rein as emperor. After reading primary sources about Caesar, it has given me a better understanding of what other people thought of him during this time period. It’s safe to say that Caesar was obsessed with power and respect from other people that would explain his thirst for war and land, which is one of his greatest strengths and helped in making Rome a great empire.
I believe that this is justified because he continued to carry out many successes with little failures. Julius Caesar accomplished many other things other than his usual victories in wars. He wasn’t only brilliant in military strategy but he was superior as a statesman, a lawgiver, an orator and historian. Because he excelled in many other tasks besides military responsibility, is what I think sets him apart from the other candidates. He genuinely cared about the public and did what he could to help reform their society; in some ways he’s like a
Would an honorable man murder his best friend? In William Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Caesar started as an innocent citizen of Rome, but soon made his way to the throne. Caesar started bettering Rome, but certain men accused him of becoming too ambitious. The conspirators, the men against Caesar, brutally murdered him because of his “ambition”. Marcus Brutus was Caesar’s supposed best friend but led the revolt against him. Brutus is characterized in the play as being gullible, noble, and naïve.
He won many great battles bringing back slaves back to Rome for freedom. He also brought gold and other spoils of war to his empire for the riches use. He was my friend, faithful and just to me, But Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man. When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept. Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man. I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition? Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, And sure he is an honorable man. (III.ii.82–96) Julius Caesar was admired by many of the great Roman senators who valued him for his acumen and courage. He had his solders under his complete control because the worshiped him so much. Even though Julius Caesar had a lot of pros being a good leader, he also had cons. He had deception towards his allies making him a little untrustworthy. In addition, to his rivals Caesar’s sportsmanship was not the best either since he was devious and
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is an intimate portrayal of the famed assassination of Julius Caesar and the complex inner workings of the men who committed the crime. In one particularly revealing scene, two of the men closest to Caesar, one a conspirator in his murder and one his second-in command, give orations for the deceased. Despite being simple in appearance, these two speeches do much of the work in developing and exposing the two characters in question. Though both have a love for Caesar, Mark Antony's is mixed with a selfish desire for power, while Brutus' is pure in nature, brought to a screeching halt by his overpowering stoicism. These starkly-contrasted personalities influence the whole of the play, leading to its tragic-but-inevitable end.
Julius Caesar is remembered as one of the greatest military minds in history and credited with arranging the basis for the Roman Empire. Caesar’s military brilliance bought Rome more land and more power, which led into the increase of size and strength of Rome. Caesar’s dictatorship helped the strength in Rome. Julius Caesar was assassinated which lead to a monarchy that was ruled by Octavin. Caesar’s death caused an effect to the collapse of the Roman Empire. Many people today in the 21st century try and follow the greatness of Julius Caesar. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a tragedy with the contributions Caesar made to strengthen Rome’s success.
Ever wondered what it takes to be a good king or ruler? Julius Caesar is one of the most famous rulers of all time. He was one of Rome’s greatest and most powerful leaders. His changes to the empire helped take Rome to new levels of success. The life of Caesar was short, yet great. It is important to learn about this great man and his many accomplishments.
Julius Caesar was a brilliant politician and a military genius that was brighter and more capable than the overwhelming majority of other Senators. His nature was kind, generous and inclined to forget grudges and turn enemies into friends, but he was also willing to be utterly ruthless. Caesar’s power kept increasing as he made new reforms that helped and changed people’s lives. The soldiers and the people loved him and that made the Senate even more fearful. His tremendous appeal and the loyal army he had behind him made it difficult for the Senate to plot people against him. Caesar’s power surpassed that of the Senate and that made them angry. He established many reforms to improve the economy. He limited the grain welfare program and established Roman colonies by giving land to the soldiers and landless peasants. He made a law that limited the number of slaves estates could employ and reduced taxes and made collections fairer. “Caesar had not fought the Civil War in order to reform the republic, and in spite of what Cicero and others later ...
Imagine it is the year 59 B.C.E., the greatest republic to date is collapsing and it seems it is doomed with a senate which does not care about its people. There seems to be no hope. But then comes a young man who has ideas of equality that could save the republic. That man is Julius Caesar. Conqueror of Gaul, Crosser of the Rubicon, member of the First Tiumbarant, Caesar was a brilliant politician and general. At the time, Rome was governed by Pompey and the senate. Both were in favor bettering themselves and not the poor people. Caesar was in favour of improving life for the lower class. This was not accepted by the senate or Pomey, making them question his ethics. As Caesar became more powerful, as when he conquered Gaul, Pompey and the senate began to plot. They could not have someone as dangerous as Caesar in Rome. Because of this, the senate planned and carried out an assassination attempt, and succeeded. This was only for the senate to maintain power and complete control over Rome. Along with caesar, a little bit of
What is “Julius Caesar”? It was a play based on the death of Julius Caesar. This play was written by the playwright William Shakespeare. This play consisted, in my standpoint of writing this, two main characteristic of rulers. The question is what are the two main characteristics of rulers? The two main types of ruling characteristics that are expressed in this play are pragmatism and a man of principle. Now the question is what is better? A ruler that is a man of principle is better because this person is idealistic, has self-control, and is honorable.
Caesar’s power in Rome was growing, and people were afraid he was going to turn Rome into a monarchy. However, Caesar did not want to be known as a king, but he was appointed dictator for life.
As a symbol, Caesar is multifaceted. To some he is a coward “Ye gods, it doth amaze me, A man of such a feeble temper should so get the start of the majestic world, and bear the palm alone.” (1.2.129). To others he is an ambitious rival “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things! O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome, Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.39). To a few, he is even a friend “He was my friend, faithful and just to me: But Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honourable man.” (3.2.91). However, to all he is a god...