Good Sources In seconds, anyone can find anything they’ve ever wanted to know on the internet. With just a few clicks of a button, one can be revealed to a whole new realm of possibilities or answers. One can find the answers they’ve been searching for, but who’s to say the source is reliable? It is important to understand that anyone can put anything on the internet. Whether it be truth, fact, lie or myth, people can do anything they want because the internet is available to all people and rarely censored or modified by any type of authority. When searching the internet for a recreational purpose it’s not that big of a deal, and someone can decide for themselves whether they deem a source legitimate or not. But when researching a topic in which one is going to then create a research paper, article or experiment out of, a credible source should be prioritized and sought after. When trying to inform or make the public aware of …show more content…
When looking for these scholarly sources, it is important to know that articles that have gone through the peer review process will have a few specific characteristics. The article itself will have an overabundance of citations, an abstract or intro to what the article is about, a few charts or tables describing the information, a complex language that corresponds to the topic itself, timestamps from when the article was submitted and published, and most peer reviewed journals proudly state on their home page that they are peer reviewed. But what makes something that is peer edited more credible than the next website? A peer edited article or journal has been passed down a line of experts accredited through a journal who then criticize the work based on many different factors. It takes approximately six months to two years after the initial submission to the journal for a piece to be
Wikipedia is a credible source When people and school kids are writing papers on a daily basis they struggle about whether Wikipedia is a credible source or not. Along with rather they should cite it. It is a good source because it has many different points of views from many different people. The next reason is that it’s a good place to start the research.
The article that I found on Google about privacy and security on the internet had an author and so did the article about privacy and security that I found on EBSCOHost. Neither of the articles were signed, but the article from EBSCOHost looked like a more resourceful one. The author from the Google article is David Gorodyansky. He seemed to be pretty credible, but not as credible or knowledgable as Scott Peppet, the author of the EBSCOHost article. The article from Google had no sources, but the one that I found on EBSCOHost provided a source where you can find the exact location of the article. This goes to show that anyone can put anything on the internet and that you have to be careful believing and/or using the information online and check it and make sure it’s accurate.
Peer Review is scientists who get there worked checked and evaluated by other scientists or experts where they check whether there results are reliable and valid by repeating it and by obtaining similar results which will provide more evidence that the scientific journal is accurate and reliable to publish worldwide. The processes involved are you have to comment on the validity of the science, also you will have to indentify the scientific errors that they could have made. Another thing that you will have to do is look which methodology they used and evaluate the importance of the findings that they have made. Lastly you will have to identify inaccurate/missing references and then determine how much of the work it is based and originality
Then there are the sites that people think are reliable, so they click on the link for information, without knowing there is a hacker waiting to commit identity
Reflective Evaluation The standardized patient experience was useful and interesting for me because I became more confident and active during nursing practice after that practice exam. It was also make me to remember 2012 and 2013 when I was working in the hospital in my country. After that practical activity, I knew how staff nurses should deal and communicate with patients who have different culture and language. Certainly, my specialization is nursing education, but I wanted to take more practical classes during the course or study.
PAPER 1 - Reflective Practice for Psychology Students: The Use of Reflective Journal Feedback in Higher Education. DISCUSSION In this article according to the author the reflective journals have appeared to be an effective way of controlling and building the reflective practices in higher education. It has been a part of the huge cognitive policy to change the learning approaches which were used before.
Stage 3 During the 2005-06 academic year an additional 10-15 faculty members were trained to be peer reviewers as part of Stage 3. This training was conducted by the peer review coordinator and included a discussion of standards of best practice, the use of the scoring rubric and how to provide useful and constructive peer criticism. As part of Stage 3, almost 30 online courses were reviewed. The most important ‘on-the-job’ training for these new reviewers was and still is the process of reviewing courses with experienced peer reviewers.
A respectable source is someone who also took the time and done research to back their opinions or theories. When writing make drafts and barnstorm ideas onto the paper which can be revised as you go. When gathering information and journals to back the work compiled ensure that the latest and most current articles are used for reference. One can always be objective towards to topics being researched try to have an open mind and remain unbiased in order to let the facts dictate the outcome.
Peer education is regarded as the effective method of reduction of smoking among adolescents as there are many documented records of how peer support can influence on smoking behaviour. (Sandstom, 2003) Kelly points out that the involvement of influential young people in the close-knit community ensures the changes in health behaviour because of their powerful influence. (Kelly, 2004) The author of the study emphasizes the peer education of smoking prevention with the help of influential students in the school.
1. Professional Interest: Clinical Counseling and Forensic Psychology (Granted permission, however, to evaluate a test used primarily in Educational Psychology.) 2. Brief Description of Test & Construct Measured: An 80 question, 10 scales (including anxiety, attitude & interest, concentration, information processing, motivation, self-testing, selecting main ideas, study aids, time management and test strategies diagnostic tool to help identify shortcomings in students’ learning skills and study patterns that may be improved through educational interventions. Can be administered individually or in groups.
For instance, David Gelernter claims that “there is no quality control on the internet” (Source E). That is to say, students will be more exposed to misinformation if they were given a laptop in lieu of a textbook. Schools should consider whether it is even effective to use the internet as a source for research. As the world has witnessed today, Google and Facebook -the biggest internet-related services- have trouble censoring false information. This problem limits student’s minds exposed to credible information, possibly teaching them subjects that are incorrect and perhaps, trivial.
1. When it comes to peer assessments I believe the most important thing is to understand what you are asked to do or talk about in order to avoid going off topic. This is something I learned while studying in Italy. Understand the task and the topic or subject in question; give me, personally the assurance that the person understood the task.
It was great to be back after a restful and much needed break. I thoroughly enjoyed the peer review task, and was looking forward to the team debate. At first I did not know how the debate would work, or what it comprised off, mostly due to it being an online debate. I read the instructions posted by the lecturer, and I was surprised to learn that it needed to be presented as a report with a presentation. I was quite familiar with this, since I did the exact same task for a module in my degree, which was also a group task.
Class: English I (9th Grade) Instructor: Kelsey Craig Topic: First Draft Group Peer Review Date: 25 October 2017 Objectives: Students will be able to effectively review peer drafts of the assigned essay topic, providing constructive and insightful feedback for their peers.
The Internet has made access to information easier. Information is stored efficiently and organized on the Internet. For example, instead of going to our local library, we can use Internet search engines. Simply by doing a search, we get thousands of results. The search engines use a ranking system to help us retrieve the most pertinent results in top order. Just a simple click and we have our information. Therefore, we can learn about anything, immediately. In a matter of moments, we can become an expert.