Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Differential between leadership and followership
What is the relationship between ethics and leadership
Differential between leadership and followership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Differential between leadership and followership
Managerial styles and Leadership both have been the center of research along with other variables such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, optimal performance etc. Leadership is generally associated with
Change, influencing, motivating, inspiring and coaching. “Leadership is not defined, but is characterized as a mechanism for accomplishing goals” (Pawar and Eastman, 1997). The contextual dimensions and culture are very important for the study of leadership / managerial styles.
Culture and context play significant role in establishing relationship between leadership, task accomplishment and power
This study seeks to find out that in Pakistan if there is any style of leadership; that is paternalistic. In order to find out the
…show more content…
It is more of a mindset than any leadership style. It is also pertinent to mention that no single style of leadership is the ultimate ideal because there are various theories related to leadership which suggests that it depends upon the situation that which leadership style or combination of different leadership styles will be beneficial in any context for the organization. Leaders usually adopt hybrid nature of leadership style for motivating, influencing and inspiring their followers for the attainment of common objectives.
Paternalistic Leaders are Benevolent Leaders and liked by their followers. Paternalistic leadership is the branch of Moral Leadership
Rao (1981) studied leadership styled from three approaches viz., Benevolent, Critical and Developmental. Benevolent leader protects followers, continuously tells them what they should and should not do. The benevolent leader is generally liked by the followers. However, there are other styles of leadership which are pertinent and applied in case of need and are present in present study for exploring the most dominant leadership style.
Present study is focused on data taken from four different educational
…show more content…
On Paternalistic Leadership and Other styles of Leadership in Pakistan
Hypothesis 6 (H6): Paternalistic leadership (PL) will be positively associated with other leadership style in the corporate sector of Pakistan.
3.3 Theoretical Framework
Figure-3 sets the theoretical framework for the study. The relevant framework is related to Path-Goal Theory of Leadership (PGT)
FIGURE-3
Theoretical Framework
---------------------
Path-Goal Theory
Inspired from: DuBrin, A., J. (2004). Leadership: Research findings, practice and skill. New York, Houghton Miffin Company.
The path-goal theory (PGT) is relevant to this study as the basic objective of finding out the most dominant / prevailing style of leadership actually knows the traits and means used by leaders in order to achieve desired outcomes. This study is limited to the extent of its research questions and hypothesis hence dimensions of outcomes, demands of the task will not be explored. It is pertinent to mention that Paternalistic Leadership (PL) is a theory in itself but it can be integrated with other theories of
In situational leadership theory and path-goal theory, both theories assume that leaders are flexible and can display any or all styles depending on the situation or environment. Situational leadership theory emphasizes the importance of adjusting leadership style based on the needs of the followers. Path-goal theory leaders help followers along their path and are more effective if they adapt their behaviors to the current environment. Each leadership theory describes four different styles or behaviors to use for effective leadership. The style of telling, selling, participating, and delegating are used in STL...
Path-goal approach to leadership by House (1971) mentions that the roles of a leader involve primarily increasing individual rewards of followers to gain goal fulfillment and make the path to rewards seamless by clarifying, removing roadblocks and increasing followers opportunities for satisfaction (Dessler & Valenzi, 1977). The theory, which primarily feeds off motivation, has conquered as an acceptably rational explanation for an individual decision-making process. The days when organizations were able to function and prosper based on their product, service, or structural innovations are no longer sufficient to keep them afloat. Nowadays, companies are required to pay extra attention to the leadership process that makes things happen.
The idea of what’s morally right and wrong changes within each culture whether an organizational culture or between individuals. However, the best leaders are the ones who do what’s right and best for the organization. During this research paper I will attempt to define the term leadership style and its concept. Moreover, I will attempt to describe three leadership styles, the development and the process one would follow to modify their leadership style. When pertaining to myself, I never saw myself as a leader but I will attempt to describe my leadership style and the advantages and disadvantage I would have in a business environment.
They further stated that most leadership forms a new paradigm for understanding both the lower and higher order effects of leadership style. The style of leadership which is adopted by a leader is influenced by the leader’s background, personal experience, religion, political affiliation, ideology, inclination, culture and even orientation without necessarily being based on the dynamics of the situation. The major leadership constructs consist of transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and lazzirfair leadership others that are going are common are democratic and autocratic types of
Mlls, D. Q. (2005). Leadership How to Lead, How to Live. Boston: Harvad Business School Press.
Lord, R. (2000). Leadership. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology, vol. 4. (pp. 499-505). Doi:10.1037/10519-216
Sims Jr., H. P., Faraj, S., & Yun, S. (2009). When should a leader be directive or empowering? How to develop your own situational theory of leadership. Business Horizons, 52, 149-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2008.10.002
Leadership Theories and Studies. (2009). In Encyclopedia of Management. Retrieved July 20, 2011 from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-3273100155.html
Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
R.J House, "A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness," Administrative Science Quarterly, September 1971, pp.321-338; and R. J. House, "Path-Goal Theory of Leadership; Lessons, Legacy and a Reformulated Theory," Leadership Quarterly, Fall 1996, pp.323-352
...House, R. J. (1996). Path-Goal Theory of Leadership: Lessons, Legacy, and a Reformulated Theory. Wharton School of Management, Leadership Quarterly. 7 (3) P. 323-352. Retrieved from http://leadership.wharton.upenn.edu/l_change/publications/House/house2.pdf
...ree leadership styles discussed are different, each of the styles has its own advantages and disadvantages. However, there are some similarities between the styles that present an opportunity for synergism. Identifying the potentials and capitalizing on them will positively increase the team productivity. It is obvious the three leadership styles have the desire to arrive at a concrete and educative decision and influence the team with directions.
Ngirwa, C. C., Euwema, M., Babyegeya, E., & Stouten, J. (2013). Leaders styles of managing
Leadership and the study of it has roots in the beginning of civilization, Egyptian rulers, Greek heroes, and biblical patriarchs all have one thing in common-leadership (THE HISTORY OF LEADERSHIP FOCUS,2005). There are numerous definitions and theories of leadership, however there are enough similarities in the definitions to conclude that leadership is the effort of influence and the power to induce compliance (Wren,1995).The organizational focus of the leader has evolved over this same period, early organizations with authoritarian leaders who believed employees were intrinsically lazy transitioned into way to make work environments more conducive to increased productivity rates (THE HISTORY OF LEADERSHIP FOCUS,2005).
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.