Parkinson’s Disease

809 Words2 Pages

Parkinson’s disease has a dramatic impact on one’s ability to control everyday movements, thus affecting quality of life and independence. (Sage, Johnston, & Almeida,2011). Parkinson’s disease is chronic, progressive, as-of-yet incurable(Hirsch, Iyer, Englert, & Sanjak,2011). Pharmacotherapy remains to be the primary treatment for Parkinson’s disease. However, it arouses complications such as motor fluctuations, dyskinesia and wearing off (Sage, Johnston, & Almeida,2011). It prompted the researchers to discover alternative therapies such as exercising, which may have the potential to improve the individual’s suffering from Parkinson’s disease, as exercise is commonly associated with cardiovascular and musculoskeletal benefits. (Sage, Johnston, & Almeida,2011).Based on two journal articles written upon this subject, this article will analyse how exercise have potential to improve the indvidual’s suffering from Parkinson’s disease. It will also compare similarities and differences of the research. The first article, “Promoting exercise in Parkinson’s Disease through community-based participatory research” written by Hirsch, M.A., Iyer, S.S., Englert,D. & Sanjak,M., was published in 2011 by future medicine limited. The aim of this article was to introduce a novel approach on delivering physical activity (exercise) for clients with Parkinson’s disease. The authors describe the community -based participatory research (CBPR) which engaged people with Parkinson’s disease. Patients were advocating as co- researchers in the development of community based research programs (Hirsch, Iyer, Englert, & Sanjak,2011). This was followed by a further discussion of providing some examples of community exercise programs and suggestions(Hirsch, Iyer,... ... middle of paper ... ... exercise intervention. Thus, the only addition to a participant’s normal routine was the exercise program they were assigned.” (Sage, Johnston, & Almeida, 2011).Therefore this method used was appropriate as they only used diagnosed participants for research instead of using all people with different types of Parkinson’s disease as it might not yield the same results as it’s really hard to proceed with so much information; whereas according to Hirsch et al. (2011), study was based on community and engages people with Parkinson’s disease and patients were advocating as a co researchers. This study was not that much appropriate as research was done on whole community without diagnosed any participants with Parkinson’s disease. Results yield from this study was based on whole community and was not limited to the diagnosed participants for the exercise research group.

Open Document