Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Self identity and ownership
Self identity and ownership
Self identity and ownership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Self identity and ownership
Ownership is a claim living things make which expresses possession. It is a natural instinct to stake your claim, or in other words ‘mark your territory’, thus the action is highly visible in our lives. Ownership is commonly thought of in relation to possession of physical objects, but it can also relate to the possession of skills or ideas, a concept contemplated by philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre. The phenomenon of ownership has varying outcomes; in some cases possession brings forth unpleasant greed and malice. But at other times claiming objects or ideas increases personal pride, and increases ability, knowledge and camaraderie. Aristotle agrees with this, and theorizes that owning something positive boosts personal character. Contrastingly, …show more content…
The desire to claim items and ideas brings forth egotistical and territorial qualities. Prioritizing the need to achieve ownership of materials above other aspects of life is detrimental to one’s character. In Into the Wild Chris McCandless’ parents devote their lives to earning money, molding them into greedy and short-tempered individuals. Over time this contributes to Chris’ disappearance. The sole objective of gaining wealth overtook them, preventing a fully balanced lifestyle. The innate need for possession, or more specifically money, leads to the surfacing of anger and greed. If ownership was not emphasized in society, these qualities would not be present. Not only does establishing dominance over resources cause hostility, but it deters from alternate aspects of life including family, community, education, and overall well-being. Obsessing over ownership promotes unhealthy greed. During the Space Race, countries competed to claim galactic objects. Creating enemies, hostilities, and anger, this battle forced nations to focus only on themselves rather than maintaining a global outlook. Focus shifted from serious issues of poverty and hunger to the
Although it may be true that Chris McCandles was stubborn, people should consider that he had family problems, he loved nature and he also had an adventurous spirit. I believe that the motives that led him to the wild were family problems and emotional damage as well as his love of nature and his adventurous spirit. In Chris’s journal it seemed like he had lived for 113 days in that “magic bus” but in his last days he had written that “death looms” and that he was “too weak to walk out”. There are many evidence that connect with family problems as well as his adventurous spirit. As I go on with this essay I will state my theory on why Chris was led into the wild as well as evidence that support my claim.
government was a corrupt, greedy pig commanding people to obey the rules of society. Yet, he
Why is that money and power can changes an individual’s personality? Well, when some humans see something desirable and valuable that doesn’t belong to them, they will go to a great extent to have it. Whether, that is stealing, lying or even killing loved ones. This is simply described as greed. Greed and ambition is a common theme in both Shakespeare’s tragic play, Macbeth and the movie “A Simple Plan”. They both share the concept of wanting something and committing crime after crime to achieve it. Similarly, the main characters in both stories become greedy after finding something valuable and their spouse encourages them further. Once in control, the main characters are willing to do anything to keep possession, even if it means to kill love ones.
It is like a tag on a shirt that keeps bothering your tender skin, it is the reason why you rip the tag off and make your own choices while walking into the unknown land of the wilderness, striving for the adventure that has dire consequences if executed improperly. Walking the unknown land of Hades abyss might have taken the sensitive life of one man, but it was done in a blaze of glory with no regrets. This man of course is Christopher McCandless in the book, Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, which is based on a true story. In the book, McCandless strives for the cold Alaskan journey into the wild to satisfy his final thirst for the wilderness but tragedy strikes and it ends by him losing the most valuable thing to him, his life. Chris McCandless had exceptional reasons for vacating the life he lived which are also justified; he was also was not foolish for leaving that life and the outcome of his journey was a triumph and not a tragedy.
Chris McCandless left his mark on the world and should be respected for being brave enough to challenge himself like this. McCandless went to Alaska searching for adventure and to live off the land. He wanted something more in life. When he went into the Alaskan wilderness , McCandless overcame so many obstacles than the average person wouldn't be able to handle. He was prepared and had all the skills he needed to survive in the wild. McCandless kept fighting against all odds and never gave up on fulfilling his dreams. He deserves more respect and admiration than he got.
Christopher McCandless of Jon Krakauer’s into the wild was a complex character with very strong convictions. Christopher stood very firmly by his beliefs no matter what people thought of him or his ideas. Christopher felt very strongly about social issues and not getting caught up in material wealth, not letting the things you own control your life and how you live it. A quote from Christopher McCandless that shows how strongly he felt about it is. “So many people live within unhappy circumstances and yet will not take the initiative to change their situation because they are conditioned to a life of security, conformity, and conservatism, all of which may appear to give one peace of mind, but in reality nothing is more damaging to the adventurous spirit within a man than a secure future.”
Chris McCandless always felt held back and restricted, either by parents or by an indifferent society in general. An abhorrence against the powers that be and against what he saw as an unfulfilled life led him to embark on a great adventure of solitude and self-discovery.
Chris McCandless is a man that went to the wild to live for one hundred and thirteen days until he finally died. Many people speculate on why McCandless went to the wild, but no one knows for sure. I am going to take a crack at why Chris Might have done this. McCandless wanted to live his life to the fullest, most possible way and live relaxed. He wanted to go to the wild for a getaway, like a vacation. Chris McCandless went to the wild to live life to the fullest; complete, unearthed, and relaxed.
In Sean Penn’s movie and Jon Krakauer’s movie, “Into the Wild” the viewers see Chris McCandless a young man who was on the road to graduate from Emory University , go into the wild because he wanted to have a different experience. Chris McCandless did have several reasons to go into the wilderness. Shaun Callarman states that McCandless had no reason to go into the Alaskan Wilderness and I disagree with this statement. But people have different opinions about McCandless going into the wilderness.In the movie, McCandless had an abusive family, he wanted to connect with nature and he wasn’t happy with his situation. So these are several reasons of why he went into the wilderness. Chris McCandless has a family that has a lot of problems, he wanted to connect with nature and he didn’t want to be part of society. Callarman states that McCandless was ignorant, he may have been ignorant but he had his reasons.
It could be assumed that having is the normal orientation in which people live their life by in the modern societies of Europe or North America. Erich Fromm stated, "To acquire, to own, and to make a profit are the sacred and unalienable rights of the individual in the industrial society" (From 1976:57). Fromm is clearly explaining that to have and to own is the dominant norm and having is related to an individual. Being individualistic is inherent to having because only one can have ownership. If having is shared, it loses its individualistic characteristic. The having orientation is the belief that to be fulfilled in life is sole ownership over a physical object(s) or in-tangibles such as ideas, thoughts or in some cases people. To further explain, the having orientation of physical property, ownership over objects is the ability to hold, possess, and be in control of. Ownership of intangibles is more an abs...
What does it mean to own something? The book definition of "own" is, "something belonging to oneself or itself." (Dictionary) Ownership is a common part of life today in many forms. We own all kinds of stuff and continue to get more. But what does it really mean to own something? Does it mean you payed for it so therefore it's yours? Does it mean you have some kind of connection to that certain thing so you believe to have ownership over it? Or does it even mean that by using the tern "ownership", you own something? People believe ownership to mean many different things. Personally, I believe that it means it is something close to you that belongs to you. I also think that ownership has a lot to do with how you feel about that certain thing. People have many different views and ideas of ownership today.
I take ownership to include unrestricted private use of an object. Of course my definition excludes the possibility of owning a
According to Aristotle, ownership of tangible goods can help to develop one’s moral character. I agree with his philosophy. Owning an object or other goods helps one to discover certain virtues, such as responsibility or purpose in caring for what you own. All objects you own, you must acquire, either through purchasing or through gift. Depending on how you acquire the object, defines its value, either monetary or sentimental. These different values help to develop one’s sense of self, as one grows as a person and develops one’s moral character. By learning these important skills, such as responsibility and purpose, one has a better understanding of oneself.
...y are bombarded from birth that they should desire and pursue money, power, fame, and success. Without achieving these goals they are seen as failures. Strain theories have shown that placing too much emphasis on individual success and the pursuit of happiness through the accumulation of power and wealth, can lead to an increase in crime.
One’s personal possessions usually have value to them because they are something that a person can truly claim as his or her own. The most desirable and most valuable possession would naturally be love. With love some, but not all, desire material possessions. Last, everyone desires security to complete the last piece of the puzzle.