Mechanistic Structure Of Organizational Design

1634 Words4 Pages

An Organizational Design Structure defines the scope of acceptable behavior within an organization, its lines of authority and accountability and to some extent the organization’s relationship with its external environment. In fact, organizational design contains much more than a general structure that is the process of aligning an organization’s structure with its mission. Deeper understanding of organizational design is about enabling groups of people to combine, coordinate, and control resources and activities in order to produce value, all in a way appropriate to the environment. So organizational design is not isolated element that is part of the process to make the organizational efficiency. This means that you cannot have previously …show more content…

So, organizational structures should be shaped and implemented for the main purpose of facilitating the achievement of organizational goals. Tom Burns and G. M. Stalker identified two basic forms of organizational structure: mechanistic and organic structures. The mechanistic is also known as a bureaucratic structure that can be characterized as hierarchical, clear area of responsibilities, centralized and commands. Companies in a mechanistic structure typically hold strict control, over processes and employees. Rules are implemented and rarely deviated; there is also a very clear chain of conduction to delegate responsibilities and power throughout the organization. It can be observed that the mechanistic structure is best suitable for companies that operate in a stable and certain environment. In short, this structure is no difficult to maintain and rarely needs to be changed when the company has a stable external environment. The mechanistic structure can be reflected in the functional structure and the divisional structure. For example, in a functional structure, there are many separate functions, such as accounting, marketing and HR. Each department is autonomous and has a divisional manager who reports to the company CEO. It is beneficial to be efficiency and emphasize the significance of …show more content…

Coordinating can be achieved by various ways such as programming, meeting and establish the corporate culture. Communication skills and interaction are important coordination that can help managers to identify the disadvantage of the organization. It is beneficial to take shape the collective perception of employees. Their beliefs and values also will assist the coordinating part of the organization. However, how does the company can do more effective coordination? It must be emphasized the responsibility and who will be taken to take this role. Discussing organization generally goes with broad and complex challenges. Coordination theory is that mechanisms and dependencies for managing them are general. Firstly, I would like to discuss with coordination mechanisms and some corresponding problems. It should be noticed that direct supervision is a special kind of coordination mechanism that works best in relatively small, centralized units. So this is also the most vertical approach. Vertical organizational structure is characterized by hierarchy, which means the power like flow from top to bottom. On the contrary, horizontal organizational structure is more decentralized, flat, and flexible, because workers are granted more responsibilities when they are working. It can be seen that the

Open Document