Organisational Structure, Culture, and Management Style of a Business C2 An Analysis of How the Organisational Structure, Culture And Management Style of the Business Affects its Performance and Operation and Help It to Meet Its Objectives The organisation structure of Wednesbury IKEA The organisation structure in the ‘Appendix section’ belongs to the Wednesbury branch of IKEA. Wednesbury IKEA is a large formal organisation and it is best suited to a hierarchical organisational structure. This is because; there are more employees as it goes downwards from each level. This type of organisational structure has many levels of management. The organisational structure has been structured according to its own function i.e. marketing, finance, human resources and sales. This is known as a functional organisation. The hierarchical organisational structure of Wednesbury IKEA is very similar to a tall organisation structure. Looking at IKEA’s organisational structure, the chain of command shows a clear line for messages within functional departments, so therefore; it leads to good communication. For example, looking at the organisational structure of IKEA, there is a clear communication within a human resources department. However, the chain of command is very long from the top to the bottom of the organisation because, there are too many levels of management. This will lead to poor communication. For example, it takes decisions a long time to reach the workers at the bottom of the organisation structure. The communication flows multi-directionally, from the top to the bottom of the organisation. The communication can flow both upwards, downwards and horizontally. I have given some examples of how communication can flow upwards, downwards and horizontally, on page 42. It is important that the functional areas of IKEA are combined effectively, if the organisation is to meet its objectives. To do this, each function of IKEA have to create a set of company objectives that, can be translated down into functional objectives, so that each function is driven by the organisation’s objectives. This is known as corporate objectives. Many of these corporate objectives are concerned with these issues: * Providing the customer what he or she want each and every time * Providing the right quality at all times * Valuing every... ... middle of paper ... ...and will work their best to achieve them. With this management style, IKEA can use various methods of communications (see E5). However this type of management style could make decision-making slow and is not appropriate to some businesses such as, manufacturing industries. The organisational structure, culture and the management style of IKEA have to perform successfully so that, together they can achieve the company’s objectives. For example, to increase profitability: the communication within the organisation have to be clear so that, staff can understand what jobs have to be carried out; staff have to be motivated to perform the job; the relationship between managers and staff have to be strong and committing; the organisation have to encourage staff to create new ideas and share them amongst others; democratic managers have to listen and act on the opinions of workforce, democratic managers have to make sure that the workforce is well aware of the objectives of IKEA, etc. If the performance of the organisational structure, culture and management style of the organisation is poor, the overall business will have difficulties in achieving its objectives.
The Relationship between the Structure, Culture, and Management Styles in Tescos There is a clear relationship between the structure, culture and management styles in Tescos here are some examples showing this: Tescos uses power culture which has a top down (tall structure) whereby objectives are determined by the individual or individuals. This structure is also linked in with an autocratic management style as this structure tends to have a ‘them and us attitude’ which depends on where individuals stand in the hierarchy. Tescos has also adopted role culture which is structured in a hierarchal way and is divided into a number of functions which ties in with a democratic style because of the multidirectional flows of communication between organisational members means there is more likely to be a team approach. This also inter relates with the ‘flat structure’ Tescos has adopted which refers to the number of levels within the hierarchy of an organisation whereby everyone’s role, position and responsibility is made clear so that there is a clear chain of command. These cultures help Tescos to meet a range of objectives from being market leader to maximising sales and profits.
...ion to a horror story, it does present questions about the “self” and the “other” as perceived by Luczak.
The culture of an organization is the set of values, beliefs, behaviors, customs, and attitudes that helps its members understand what the organization stands for, how it does things, and what it considers important"(Griffin, 49). In other words, "the way things work around here" (Dr. Williams). In order for any small business or large corporation to be successful, the employees must understand what is expected of them. While things might be slightly different in a large corporation versus a small "mom and pop shop", the goal of both is the same. MAKE THE BUSINESS MONEY. The topic of my paper will be on makes a good corporate culture.
The essay will describe the concept of organizational culture and national culture. In the course of trying to describe both types of culture; subcultures and socialization examples will be discussed. A few real world examples will be mentioned in an attempt to further explain the topics in the essay. There are many similarities to how organizations and nations are structured and shaped by culture. The concept of cross-cultured management and multinational corporations are also a concept that organizations use to explain the behavior of their culture. Finally the essay will discuss how organizational and national cultures are interrelated. The interrelationship can be explained in the cultural dimensions and how the influence behavior and management.
The concept of organizational cultures was first raised in 1970s, and soon became a fashionable topic. Organizational culture is the shared beliefs, values and behaviours of the group. Theorists of organizations believe that organizational culture represents the pattern of behaviours, values, and beliefs of an organization. Hence, studies around organizational culture have been seen as great helpful and essential for understanding organizations and their behaviours. Additionally, organizational culture has been considered to be an important determinant of organizational success. Therefore, leaders and managers pay more than more attentions on this topic, focusing on constructing and managing organizational cultures.
Corporate culture is the shared values and meanings that members hold in common and that are practiced by an organization’s leaders. Corporate culture is a powerful force that affects individuals in very real ways. In this paper I will explain the concept of corporate culture, apply the concept towards my employer, and analyze the validity of this concept. Research As Sackmann's Iceberg model demonstrates, culture is a series of visible and invisible characteristics that influence the behavior of members of organizations. Organizational and corporate cultures are formal and informal. They can be studied by observation, by listening and interacting with people in the culture, by reading what the company says about its own culture, by understanding career path progressions, and by observing stories about the company. As R. Solomon stated, “Corporate culture is related to ethics through the values and leadership styles that the leaders practice; the company model, the rituals and symbols that organizations value, and the way organizational executives and members communicate among themselves and with stakeholders. As a culture, the corporation defines not only jobs and roles; it also sets goals and establishes what counts as success” (Solomon, 1997, p.138). Corporate values are used to define corporate culture and drive operations found in “strong” corporate cultures. Boeing, Johnson & Johnson, and Bonar Group, the engineering firm I work for, all exemplify “strong” cultures. They all have a shared philosophy, they value the importance of people, they all have heroes that symbolize the success of the company, and they celebrate rituals, which provide opportunities for caring and sharing, for developing a spiri...
Spinoza had many radical ideas that were controversial at the time. He believed that God and Nature are one, G-d, is the only substance of the world, and
Spinoza simply believes that there are flaws in the way people interpret religion and Scripture. Spinoza claims that individuals can not interpret the Scripture through translation. Spinoza argues that due to the fact that no language is translated completely correct, translations have alterations. “We must take especial care, when we are in search of the meaning of a text, not to be led away by our reason in so far as it is founded on principles of natural knowledge (to say nothing of prejudices): in order not to confound the meaning of a passage with its truth, we must examine it solely by means of the signification of the words, or by a reason acknowledging no foundation but Scripture.” (Spinoza ch. 7) He argues that you must treat Scripture the way natural scientists treat nature. When interpreting Scripture, the interpretations must be limited to what is in the Bible. This is similar to how natural scientists look at nature and make inquires based on
Descartes and Spinoza appear to hold different perceptions in regard to the existence of substance. However, both scholars have some comparable perceptions of the same in some aspects. They both refer to God as the primary substance. One thing that both Spinoza and Descartes seem to agree in general is the definition of substance. According to Spinoza, a substance is nothing but a thing that subsists in a manner that it does not depend on any other thing for its survival. In the introduction of his work, Ethics, Spinoza illustrates substance as 'what it is conceived through itself and in itself'. He elaborated this to mean that a substance does not require a sense of anything else to exist, which also seem to coincide with Aristotle's interpretations of how a substance exists, that it is independent of all other things. (1).
Organizational Culture and Structure Successful organizations recognize the impacts of organizational culture and its influence on many facets of business. Strong culture serves to support a business’ structure and furthers its efficiencies by keeping the focus where it belongs. Organizational structure uses the company’s culture as a moral and visionary compass. Both organizational culture and organizational structure play significant roles in a company’s resulting ethics, job performances, and retention rates. Ethical Effects Organizational culture is the basis for which ethical behaviors are established.
Edgar Schein, a famous theorists dealing with organizational culture, provides the following definition for the term: "A pattern of shared basic assumptions that the group learned as it solved its problems that has worked well enough to be considered valid and is passed on to new members as the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in relation to those problems." (organizationalculture101) However, organizational culture is more than sharing assumptions used by a group to solve problems; it is the combination of the points of view, ineffectual processes, education, backgrounds of all the staff which are part of an organization way of doing things. Corporation culture should uncover from the board of the directors to the rest of the employees. Although there are many fundamentals of an organizational culture, the organizational values, beliefs and norms are the key basis of organizational culture. Organizational Core Values reflect the guiding principles for corporate behavioral, they are normally stated in the corporation guidelines these days they are accessible on any company’s website. Organizational Beliefs includes the theory use in a corporation that explain the way things are done and their internal policies to inspire employees to be more productive and work towards the corporation’s goals. The norms are a combination of the values and beliefs plus those accepted behaviors in a business. Within the norms companies may present how a company expects individuals to behave, perform their jobs, ways of proper communication and leadership styles. The organizational culture of a corporation starts with the founder’s vision of creating a business and believing in their ideas. As the first leaders in an organization th...
What is corporate culture? At its most basic, it's described as the personality of an organization, or simply as "how things are done around here." It guides how employees think, act, and feel. Corporate culture is a broad term used to define the unique personality or character of a particular company or organization, and includes such elements as core values and beliefs, corporate ethics, and rules of behavior. Some companies have a strong and extremely evident corporate culture; one example of this is Southwestern Airlines.
Culture can be defined as the beliefs, values and the pattern of behavior of an individual within designated areas. The culture of organizations defines shared values and behavioral expectations. Cultural issues are especially basic issues all around the globe. These issues can happen in various routes relying upon the size, area and the custom culture of that institution. Social issues happen even because of the states of mind and how each individual comprehend in diverse business environment. Today, the corporate administrations and rising business firms have chosen to give the essential attention on trainings and classes at the multicultural working environment that will help them to understand and create
The concept of organizational culture is one of the most debated topics for researchers and theorists. There is no one accepted definition of culture. People even said that it is hard to define culture and even more change it. It is considered a complex part of an organization although many have believed that culture influences employee behavior and organizational effectiveness (Kilmann, Saxton, & Serpa 1985; Marcoulides & Heck, 1993; Schein, 1985a, 1990).
...ranscendence of God, and ascription of free will to human beings and to God. According to Spinoza, this features made the world unintelligible.