Leadership Case Study: Bay Area Medical Center

688 Words2 Pages

A leader refers to an individual who has the capability of influencing others to attain an outcome that is desired. How leaders accomplish this is based in part on their style of leadership and involves various perspectives between different people. It is worthwhile noting that some leaders show a form that is charismatic whereas some exhibit a transformation aspect. However, as much as these styles of leadership are aimed at helping us to understand the leadership techniques of various people, the element of what makes a leader great is not addressed. The reason is that there is no precise observation on whether leaders are born, or they are made. This paper is going to be based on Olson's case study. The core emphasis is the analysis of …show more content…

Olson says that in February 1999, mistrust was a major incidence at the hospital organization and it posed a negative impact regarding development. Competition led to the uncertainty of the hospital’s future and due to poor leadership, it was not easy to attain space needs for diagnostics and surgeries involving outpatients (Olson, 2009). The board of directors of the hospital 0rganization together with the employees had greater anxiety in the non-supporting environment that entailed leadership in the Bay Area Medical Center.

Leadership transformation was very crucial to sustaining the reputation of the hospital that was growing to be negative. Thus, successful efforts in initiating the transformation were to bridge the gap of communication and gaining confidence by coming up and developing a plan that is strategic.
Bridging the Communication Gaps in Leadership In May 1999, upon being appointed as the CEO of the BAMC organization, he talked about his leadership strategies of bridging the gap of communication with the community and the medical staff. The key emphasis was to come up with a relationship that is open and integrity in the aspect of communication within the medical care. Therefore, the techniques developed in the case study were all aimed at ensuring that everybody was suited to the channel of communication and that there was freedom of expression (Cohen,

Open Document