John Oliver And Jessica Williamss: An Analysis Of Frisky Business

1227 Words3 Pages

The segment from the Daily show featuring John Oliver and Jessica Williams called “Frisky Business” talks about Stop and Frisk and puts it into a different context. Jessica Williams states that she is doing the interview from Wall Street, one of New York City’s most crime-ridden neighborhoods. She tell John Oliver that she does not feel safe there and that police need to start doing their job and frisk the individuals who are on Wall Street. John Oliver counters Jessica by saying that she is calling for the arbitrary harassment of anyone on Wall Street. Jessica says that the police should stop and frisk anyone on Wall Street who is wearing a tailor made suit, slicked back hair, and always in need of sunscreen, “if you know what I mean.” Jessica …show more content…

They way John and Jessica are presenting Stop and Frisk will educate the public on what Stop and Frisk is, and how police are perpetuating a negative stereotype of minorities. I think that this video shows Stop and Frisk in a different context by targeting rich white Americans, and can educate the court’s how Stop and Frisk impacts the communities that are affected by this police procedure. The use of Stop and Frisk is effecting the way citizens view police officers. This police procedure is impacting the trust that the citizens are supposed to have in law enforcement, because they are targeting minorities and abusing their authority. Stop and Frisk is also distracting the communities from the authority of the Supreme Court because by saying that Stop and Frisk is constitutional, they are losing the trust of the American public. This video Frisky Business show deep meaning in the fact that Stop and Frisk is effecting every community in America in a negative way. This true because law enforcement is abusing their power by using Stop and Frisk to target minorities and do it in a legal way. I think this video is a good way to raise awareness on the issue of Stop and Frisk and will cause debate on whether or not the Supreme Court should revisit this issue. Many videos have surfaced and showed that law enforcement was abusing their power, and stopping innocent people because of “reasonable suspicion.” The question many people have raised is what exactly reasonable suspicion is and how does law enforcement differentiate reasonable from unreasonable

Open Document