Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature review on employee engagement
Literature review on employee engagement
Literature review on employee engagement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literature review on employee engagement
How can employee engagement be used:
To improve perceptions of fairness in the workplace.
Employee engagement can be used to improve perceptions of fairness in the workplace in different ways but the basic of those is to focus on the aggregating and firming the employees understanding and perception of the support they get from their employer within the workplace. Employee behavior can be greatly affected based on their perceptions of their workplace and their level of engagement. As per the example by Greenburg 2002, perception of the procedures used to determine pay raises uniquely contribute to such factors as organizational commitment and trust in supervisors (both of which are strongly related to employee engagement). And, perceptions of outcome are uniquely associated with an employee’s own pay satisfaction.
This clarifies that how important an employee perception can reflect his/her behavior towards the workplace and organization. The fair the process and procedures will be the better perception the employee’s will have. The process of building the perception about the workplace starts as early as the first point of contact between the employee and the employer at the time of the lodgment of the application. The fair the process is, the better the employee perception is and that will give an employee enough confidence that his/her application was handled with honesty and an equal attention.
There can possibly be other factors involved too that can effect an employee’s perception about the workplace. They can range from the colleagues from multicultural backgrounds, minority or majority of different cultural combinations and different levels of expertise. The other factor that can effect an employee perception include...
... middle of paper ...
...loyee can trust and their level of perception can increase on the organizations. Once an employee can feel and see the fairness in all the levels of its engagement with the organization that can build a more trusted and loyal relationship between employee and the employer. Majority of the organizations are implementing procedures that can declare them as an equal opportunity employer where there is no discrimination on minority or lower level of employees. And they have the full right to distrust the organization based on the fairness of the policies and procedures involved with the issues and risks. Organizations can work hard to up their leadership and management to win the trust of such employees and to remove the feeling and the left out of such level of employee thus giving them the status of an equal employee right as the other majority of the employees have.
The Industrial Revolution was a booming age for the United States that, though it brought many improvements in technology, caused many controversial events to take place.. Through the story Life in the Iron-mills, Rebecca Harding Davis proves the negativity of the factories from the Industrial Revolution. She proves this from personification, symbolism/metaphors, and also visual imagery. Rebecca Harding Davis proves through her writing, that the effect of industrialism in not pretty.
Workers feeling, which includes competitive compensation and reward strategies, professional growth and development, career paths and succession plans and the organizations leadership and culture are contributing factors of employee engagement
People’s personal ethnic culture, personal belief and opinions can have an effect on the work they do as they may feel like something isn’t right, or they believe strongly towards or against something. As well as this, people’s attitudes can also have an effect on work itself due to something such as wages received. They may not feel like what one is gaining isn’t fair to what they are personally earning and this can cause people to slack or feel like they are being treated
With all discrimination aside, what’s important is to show some honest respect, ethics, value, and loyalty to every employee.
Thereby, since we understand that organizational strategies are needed to eliminate on the job discrimination, we also must understand that defeating it can be very difficult and can cause conflict amongst everyone. We all have some form of bias, but within the DOJJ one would think that these bias whatever they maybe would remain off the job, but that can only happen in a perfect world. So, since our world in not perfect, we need to develop some form of strategy to avoid this type of conflict on the job. As we examine this issue we found out that “discrimination often occurs when one culture does not understand another, therefore, organizations need to spend time training staff in cultural diversity and strategies for effective communication” (“Best practice in”,
The opponents of the use of labor unions for collective bargaining in today’s workplace argue that the irrelevance of these organizations is demonstrated n the recent steady decline of the rate of unionization. One of the main arguments used to show that labor unions are outdated impediments to progress is the ever increasing managerial hostility and attitudes towards unions. This hostility and attitude is a by-product of negativity as well as other factors or a consequence of combination of factors. Managers have continued to show their negativity towards labor unions because of differences in market composition and structures, changes in labor laws, organization size, differences in public policies, union philosophies, and the impacts of unions on wages (Campolieti, Gomez & Gunderson, 2013, p.100).
The discrimination law demotivates the employees but the equal opportunity motivates the employees. Motivated employees try to provide the best output to the organization. iv) The discrimination law creates discrimination, harassment, victimization on the other hand equal opportunity creates worker’s participation, worker’s satisfaction, increased output. 3.3 compare the approaches to managing equal opportunities and managing diversity i)
The company motivates employees by providing “reward” and “engagement”. Reward is evaluating the employees properly and giving reasonable salary, and are divided into three parts:
The employee engagement has become a hot topic of discussion in the corporate world. There is no single accepted definition of engagement or recognised approach for measuring or raising it. HRM Practitioners have involved in quite a lot of study to understand employee engagement and its impact on the performance of the organisation. According to them, employee engagement is a level of commitment and involvement of employees towards their organisation and its value. An engaged employee works with his/her colleagues to improve their productivity within their job, for the ultimate benefit of the organisation.
...onship between the employer and the employee. Employers who recognize this and proactively use strategies to promote employee involvement and fair employment practices will be likely to reap the organizational rewards of doing so.
Within an organization, there are always people that think and behave differently, all dependent on their personal values and cultures. Efficient managing of the human resources is an art, and it is hard to find a perfect solution/combination. It is important that management recognize and understand that people work differently. This is why it is important to have strong cultural foundations that also guides how employees are expected to behave and work. Thereby it should be easier for management to utilize the work force diversity to something meaningful.
Suffield, L., & Templer A. (2012). Labour Relations, PH Series in Human Resources Management, 3rd Edition
There are many different approaches and theories regarding industrial relations nowadays. In order to mount an opinion on which is the ‘best’ or most appropriate theory of industrial relations, each theory will have to be analyzed. The three most prevalent theories of industrial relations which exist are The Unitarist theory, The Pluralist theory and The Marxist theory. Each offers a particular perception of workplace relations and will therefore interpret such events as workplace conflict, the role of trade unions and job regulation very differently. I will examine each of these theories in turn and then formulate my own opinion regarding which is the ‘best’ or most appropriate theory.
The pluralist approach to industrial relations accepts that conflict is inherent in society and can be accommodated through various institutional arrangements. Pluralism recognizes the existence of more than one ruling principle and allows for different and divergent views from both management and trade unions, achieved through negotiation, concession and compromise. This approach to industrial relations reinforces the value and legitimacy of collective bargaining between management and trade unions as conflict-resolving and rule-making processes. This approach is found in businesses with a large number of employees, such as aa retail store chain or hotel chain.
Industrial Conflict is a broad and complex topic and conflicts may arise from many diverse issues resulting hostile acts by employers and employees.