Hillary Clinton Rhetorical Analysis

Presidential election 2016 is on its way and all the candidates are trying their best to get a maximum number of votes. Hillary Clinton is one of the candidates for the presidential election of the United States. As the presidential election campaigns are going on, Hillary Clinton campaign has released a number of advertisements, two of which are “brave” and “children.” The emotionally charged ads used for Clinton 's campaign depict her filled with compassion, altruism, strong family values and solid leadership qualities.This symbolism is a powerful tool to persuade people to vote for her by showing the reasons why they should unite with her.

Rhetorical Analysis of the Debate The ability to apply logos, ethos, and pathos in an effective way in the presidential debate proves a presidential candidate’s ability to persuade the audience that he/she is qualified for being the leader of the country. Throughout the final debate, the rhetorical victory should go to Hillary Clinton because she was more persuasive than Donald Trump to use strong evidence to clearly answer Chris Wallace’s questions, establish a qualified character by using credible sources and an appropriate tone, and present vivid examples to appeal to the values and beliefs of the audiences who have the same stance on deportation, women’s rights, and gun control. Clinton’s logic was clearer than Trump. When answering each of questions, Clinton always started with her answers, followed by specific explanations.

“The beauty of me is that I am very rich” according to Donald Trump. His ignorance has lead him to do things that he shouldn’t being doing or has done. In the past few months he has been racist man that would insult people that are from a different race. When Trump started running for president he would insult and bully everybody in general not knowing the people’s stories. He made people seem like they are poor and have nothing to live for, Trump’s inability to see past his greed. He wants to separate the United States and wants people to think he is the best of the best; Trump should not be President.

Dear Independant Candidate Leyla Munden, There are many ways to advertise a campaign but I have ideas that could be the smartest and most ethical way. While most candidates focus on distracting voters from their negative aspects and bashing their opponents, I think it would be most informative, effective, and ethical to focus primarily on stacking the deck. The best way to spend money for your campaign is with $600,000 on stacking the deck, $300,000 on testimonials, and $100,000 on glittering generalities. I would like to spend the most money on stacking the deck because it is the best way to get your information out there and to let the voters know exactly what ideals they are voting for. For example, in Reagan’s Prouder, Stronger, Better TV ad, the narrator lists off all of Reagan’s

Clinton and Sanders both defend their arguments with personal connections and rhetorical techniques. Clinton makes an effective use of personal connections. For example, Clinton defends herself by saying that no one “has had more money spent against her” (Clinton) than herself when Sanders argued that she did not represent the working class. She also uses many other examples, such as which issues she supports and which ones she has worked on. This has an effect on the audience because they would rather hear support from personal connections rather than ones from other resources (besides statistics she uses as evidence, of course). One of the rhetorical techniques that Clinton uses in her argument is the three appeals. Clinton uses pathos to

The Palestinian dilemma affects more than just the Israelis and Palestinians. The refugee camps and militant organizations have impacted the surrounding nations and the Arab’s defeat is an emotional, memorable humiliation to Arabs everywhere in the region. The United States needs to aggressively change its position in the region, adapting to the situation on the ground, even if this means reducing support of Israel and pressuring them to make concessions in order to form a Palestinian state.

Have you seen any of the recent campaign advertisements that have been published by the 2016 presidential candidates? Presidential candidates are known for campaigning through different media outlets, such as television advertisements, social media, and their party rallies. In these advertisements, the candidates bash their opponents and try to show you why you should vote for them, and why you should not vote for their opponent. Hillary Clinton’s advertisements have really stood out to me and have been able to grab my attention. Particularly the “Role Models” video, which displays young children watching Donald Trump make discriminatory and offensive comments on the television screen. Hillary Clinton’s campaign advertisement effectively gets

...untries’ shared values, providing years of unparalleled military and diplomatic support. But now those ties are being tested. The Arab Spring, Iran’s nuclear ambitions, failed peace talks, and Israel’s own decision to give Washington the cold shoulder have put new strains on the 65-year-old alliance. Without solving the Occupation, Israel will continue being a failed state. Societal chaos in Palestine can be directly attributed to a conflict in which Israel is at least an equal partner. Accordingly, the U.S. should treat the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a serious menace to America’s safety and move forcefully to end it. As a Civil Affairs team deploying to Israel and trying to meet Department of State, Department of Defense, and USAID’s objectives for the country we should put in place project and programs to help ease tensions between Israelis and Palestinians.

During June of 2018, Donald Trump is president and was caught embezzling money for himself and his businesses by stealing money set aside for defense funds which include building a bigger wall between the United States and Mexico, and funding our overseas wars with the Middle East. He is facing potential impeachment and legal action should be he found guilty. Since taking presidency, Trump has taken advise from other more than he has in the past. In July, he issued a public apology to America.

Sorting through the rhetoric and divisiveness present during this pivotal election year is a difficult task. There seem to be endless speeches and debates, with many policy positions to sort through and reflect upon. In light of these challenges, Catholics might feel a temptation to become disengaged.