The Presidential Candidate Rhetorical Analysis

829 Words2 Pages

Politics is dirty and competitive and has not changed between 1879 and 2018. It is a complex system of jargon, charm, facts, and lies. Mark Twain’s “The Presidential Candidate” satirically expresses the essence of both old-world and modern politics as a presidential candidate who blatantly tells the truth of his wrongdoings. As a politician, one must be an open book. Their life must be truthfully written on the pages for the readers to analyze and evaluate their credibility as leaders. “The Presidential Candidate” resonates both in 1879 and 2018 with his use of humor, use of diction and use of subtlety. Mark Twain’s use of humor in the story mocks and shines light on the issues of our society’s political system from back then that continue …show more content…

Towards the end of the story for example, Twain’s presidential candidate admits to “[burying] a dead aunt under my grapevine” (Twain 4). He writes asking rhetorically if this makes him unfit for being President, to which he follows up with pointing out that the “Constitution of our country does not say so.” (Twain 4) He has not done something illegal, but he has broken what some would say moral law. He feels just because he wishes to hold such a position and that he had been truthful of his wrongdoing that he should not be under scrutiny for it. This is comparable to today’s political sexual scandals because nowhere in the Constitution does it explicitly say that a politician would be eliminated as a candidate for the Presidency, but most have their careers ruined by being under fire. For instance, this year the governor of Missouri was accused of having an affair before his run for the Missouri office. “Greitens also said he had no plans to leave office, despite calls from Republican and Democratic lawmakers for him to resign.” (Porter) The governor of Missouri may not intend to step down, but with more issues rising concerning the affair and his public image, he may have to step down. This all suggests that perhaps sometimes honesty is not always the correct move and that these private matters should be kept out of the public’s

Open Document