Course: HCA 375
Instructor: Vicki Sowle
Discussion: Week (2) Discussion (2)
Topic: Managed Care
Managed Care Organizations (MCO’s) formed in the 1970’s. There are two organizations that fall under the MCO umbrella commonly known as HMO’s and PPO’s. With HMO’s, the primary care physician acts as a chief liaison, thus organizing services and treatment for the patient. With the organizational structure of HMO plans, patients must see the PCP to access specialized services they may need; however, PPO plans allow additional flexibility for the patient by allowing the patient to choose providers within the network relieving the primary care physician of acting as a gateway keeper.
The primary purpose of Managed Care Organizations is to provide
…show more content…
After reading our text, I noticed a pattern as time grew, along with advanced technology, new laws and regulations, the demand for flexibility and consumer demand for more healthcare choices grew thus warranting the need for other plans. Over the next era, I believe a halt occurred for MCO’s due to consumers wanting to take advantage of alternate plans available.
As healthcare cost is constantly rising, MCO’s have once again, took the forefront and become mainstream in today’s healthcare insurance industry as a leading provider. Do I think MCO’s are effective as they intended to be? No, I do not feel MCO’s are effective as they were envisioned to be.
In support of my opinion, the challenge of providing quality healthcare services and containing cost remains constant. For example, quality may be compromised for incentives or pay-out bonuses; MCO’s face reputation challenges because they must remain loyal to their members, by the same token MCOs need to manage cost which is often a challenge’s. Another challenge could evolve from creating an effective team of physicians, nurses and other medical professionals that work cohesively. While MCO’s have proven effective in many ways, whether MCO’s further promote quality and contains cost remains
This group is more focused on satisfaction, access and quality of care. Providers, or practitioners, are also key stakeholders within an organization. The term provider can encompasses not only physicians and surgeons, but also nurses, physical and occupational therapists, technicians, and other members of a clinical staff. Providers fall into two categories, primary, which includes hospitals and health departments and secondary, which includes educational institutions and pharmaceutical companies. Providers are focused on the best treatments for patients and are involved in delivering health services and products. The final element of the MCQ model is the employer who by far is the largest paying and purchasing stakeholder of an organization. The employers focus is primarily on their return on investment within an organization. Cost and quality is a focus for employers when choosing health benefits but are mindful that access is just as important. Within the Patient Healthcare model, MCQ explains the interactions between the four elements of employer, patient, provider and payer while the Iron Triangle focuses on the factors of cost, quality, and access. The Patient Healthcare model charges healthcare leaders with the task of balancing satisfaction with the stakeholder (employer, patient, provider, and payer) in relation to cost, quality and access. This may be very difficult since stakeholders may have competing priorities. Changes and variations made in how healthcare organizations operate may have profound effects on how stakeholders perceive the quality, access and cost. For instance, a patient may consider cost to be a top priority when seeking healthcare and at the same time the healthcare organization may consider raising costs and therefore devaluing access and quality. Patients who begin to incur high out-of-pocket costs may begin to perceive a financial
Doctors play a major role in society today because doctors will use medicalization to gain power to their name or to their practices and more importantly their income. Another reason why medicalization is apparent in society has also to do with MCOs. MCOs are health insurance providers that restrain costs by monitoring closely the health services given to patients. MCOs either support or oppose medicalization, depending on which tactic best protects their interests (Weitz, 2012,
To guarantee that its members receive appropriate, high level quality care in a cost-effective manner, each managed care organization (MCO) tailors its networks according to the characteristics of the providers, consumers, and competitors in a specific market. Other considerations for creating the network are the managed care organization's own goals for quality, accessibility, cost savings, and member satisfaction. Strategic planning for networks is a continuing process. In addition to an initial evaluation of its markets and goals, the managed care organization must periodically reevaluate its target markets and objectives. After reviewing the markets, then the organization must modify its network strategies accordingly to remain competitive in the rapidly changing healthcare industry. Coventry Health Care, Inc and its affiliated companies recognize the importance of developing and managing an adequate network of qualified providers to serve the need of customers and enrolled members (Coventry Health Care Intranet, Creasy and Spath, http://cvtynet/ ). "A central goal of managed care is containing the costs of delivering care, but the wide variety of organizations typically lumped together under the umbrella of managed care pursue this goal using combination of numerous strategies that vary from market to market and from organization to organization" (Baker , 2000, p.2).
The strategic plan for 2015 led to a membership growth of 650,000 members. The main internal driver for the astounding growth, being managed care offered at 20% to 25% less than the surrounding competitors (Brooking Institution, 2015). The more membership growth the more profitable Kaiser becomes based managed care system. Kaiser Permanente’s growth can be related to high scores amongst CMS and it’s highly recommended operation structure amongst the healthcare industry. According to the CMS “2016 Star Ratings Fact Sheet,” Kaiser Permanente represents five of 12 medicare health plans (with Parts C and D) that earned 5 stars — and of the 1.6 million beneficiaries enrolled in those 5-star plans nationwide, 81 percent are Kaiser Permanente Medicare members (Kaiser press release). The Kaiser Permanente Medicare plans since 2009 have always been operating at a high performance
It is enthralling to note that in spite of the advances in healthcare systems, such as our hospital’s ability to provide patients with lower cost, managed One being the Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO), which was first proposed in the 1960s by Dr. Paul Elwood in the "Health Maintenance Strategy”. The HMO concept was created to decrease increasing health care costs and was set in law as the Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973, after promotion from the Nixon Administration. HMO would, in exchange for a fee, allow members access to employed physicians and facilities. In return, the HMO received market access and could earn federal development funds.
Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) is a group of individual health plans that are intended to provide services for costumers’ that purchase insurance policies and for those that cannot afford health insurance. Many of these organization are led by physicians, and other professionals that network together to make health care affordable for patients. In the HMO category there are five separate managed care plan models. First, the Group Model (HMO), is a group that has a number of physicians that mainly agree to provide care to a defined group of patients in return for a fix rate capita payment for discounted fees from insurance companies (Henderson, 2012 p.212).
Pay-for-performance (P4P) is the compensation representation that compensates healthcare contributors for accomplishing pre-authorized objectives for the delivery of quality health care assistance by economic incentives. P4P is increasingly put into practice in the healthcare structure to support quality enhancements in healthcare systems. Thus, pay-for-performance can be seen as a means of attaching financial incentives to the main objectives of clinical care. However, reimbursement is a managed care payment by a third party to a beneficiary, hospital or other health care providers for services rendered to an insured or beneficiary. This paper discusses how reimbursement can be affected by the pay-for-performance approach and how system cost reductions impact the quality and efficiency of healthcare. In addition, it also addresses how pay-for-performance affects different healthcare providers and their customers. Finally, there will also be a discussion on the effects pay-for-performance will have on the future of healthcare.
When one examines managed health care and the hospitals that provide the care, a degree of variation is found in the treatment and care of their patients. This variation can be between hospitals or even between physicians within a health care network. For managed care companies the variation may be beneficial. This may provide them with opportunities to save money when it comes to paying for their policy holder’s care, however this large variation may also be detrimental to the insurance company. This would fall into the category of management of utilization, if hospitals and managed care organizations can control treatment utilization, they can control premium costs for both themselves and their customers (Rodwin 1996). If health care organizations can implement prevention as a way to warrant good health with their consumers, insurance companies can also illuminate unnecessary health care. These are just a few examples of how the health care industry can help benefit their patients, but that does not mean every issue involving physician over utilization or quality of care is erased because there is a management mechanism set in place.
Health Maintenance Organizations, or HMO’s, are a very important part of the American health care system. Also referred to as managed care programs, HMO's are combinations of doctors and insurance companies that are formed into one organization. This organization provides treatment to its members at fixed costs and decides on what treatment, if any, will be given based on the patient's or doctor's current health plan. Sometimes, no treatment is given at all. HMO's main concerns are to control costs and supposedly provide the best possible treatment to their patients. But it seems to the naked eye that instead their main goal is to get more people enrolled so that they can maintain or raise current premiums paid by consumers using their service. For HMO's, profit comes first- not patients' lives.
Formed in 1998, the Managed Care Executive Group (MCEG) is a national organization of U.S. senior health executives who provide an open exchange of shared resources by discussing issues which are currently faced by health care organizations. In the fall of 2011, 61 organizations, which represented 90 responders, ranked the top ten strategic issues for 2012. Although the issues were ranked according to their priority, this report discusses the top three issues which I believe to be the most significant due to the need for competitive and inter-related products, quality care and cost containment.
Competitive advantage matters greatly to those responsible for the management of healthcare institutions. Together with rapidly escalating healthcare costs, increasingly complex medical technologies, and growing regulatory and legal pressures, healthcare organizations face a critical need to improve the quality of care at reduced costs (Cu...
In conclusion, managed care integrates the functions of financing, insurance, delivery, and payment within an organization. It also exercises formal control over utilization. Managed care is viewed as accepting the lowest competitive bid for services rendered. Today, HMOs and PPOs are the most common and widely used models for managed care. Although managed care is here to stay, it requires revision in some areas. Challenges that are to be faced include double agentry, fidelity, confidentiality, honesty, and vulnerability. With the help and guidance of health information professionals, managed care will continue to escalade and become better for all.
HMOs were designed–by Democrats and Republicans to dispose of individual medical coverage. Under an HMO course of action, individuals pay a set sum each month, and the HMO consents to give all their care or to pay for the secured mind that they can't give. The HMO enlists doctors and sets up clinics. The individual picks a particular supplier for his or her care called a primary care physician (PCP). Individuals agree to accept HMO coverage through their employer or through an individual arrangement.
The balance between quality patient care and medical necessity is a top priority and the main concern of many of the healthcare organizations today. Due to the rising cost of healthcare, there has been a change in the focus of reimbursement strategies that are affecting the delivery of patient care. This shift from a fee-for-service towards a value-based system creates a challenge that has shifted many providers’ focus more directly on their revenue. As a result, organizations are forced to take a hard look at the cost of services they are providing patients and then determining if the services and level of care are appropriate for the prescribed patient care.
For the PPO (Preferred Provider Organization) an individual is given a moderate freedom to choose his or her health care providers and a person does not have to get a primary care doctor referral to see a certain specialist. If a person sees out network doctor you will pay more cash than seeing the health care providers who are in the network (Weaver, C. A., at el 2016). If a person sees an in-network doctor there is no paperwork involved but if you see the out network a person will just have to pay the healthcare