Explain Why The Cherokee Should Be Allowed To Stay

748 Words2 Pages

Allow the Cherokees To Stay Harlene Villadelgado Should we allow the Cherokees to remain on their homelands? Well, it’s actually the government’s decision, but do they have the rights to force the Cherokee to move away from their homelands? The Cherokees owned the lands, they lived there first, their agriculture are there and seems like their lives were depends on their lands. President Jackson and the white settlers should allow the Cherokees to stay. The reasons of why the Cherokees should stay are that first, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Jackson and the state of Georgia can’t force them to move, second is that only few chiefs signed the treaties that says they should or will move, not all of them agreed to the treaty, and third, they had already created their own nation, they have their own language, printing, government, agriculture and economy. The Cherokees should receive their rights to stay and be allowed to remain and stay on their homelands. First, the Cherokees don’t want to move to their new territory. According to Joan Marshall in the article “Allow the Cherokee To Stay” that, they were treated horrible, and they didn’t get the treaties said when they moved. The Cherokees decided to ring their problems to the U.S. Supreme Court which is just fair. The U.S. Supreme Court didn’t really favor on the Cherokees but …show more content…

The Cherokees have the right to stay to their homelands and not be moved to different place because they were the first one there and they own it. The Indians should be allowed to stay because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Jackson or the state of Georgia cannot force them to move, only few of their chiefs signed the treaty and they had already created their own nation where they have their own language, printing press, government, agriculture and economic. The Native Americans should be allowed to stay and remain to their

Open Document