Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of organizational commitment
Why is organizational commitment important
Outcomes of organisational commitment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of organizational commitment
Introduction
Currently organizations are facing with an increasingly competitive global business climate. That pressurizes organizations to develop policies to enhance workplace commitment on the one hand, and leads employees to develop their skills on being spiritual by considering the goods of their organizations and leader/managers on the other by keeping themselves away from being involved in counterproductive work practices. Organizational commitment has been defined in number of different ways that have evolved throughout the years. Popular definitions have been proposed by Becker (1960) and Porter et al. (1974). Becker (1960) defined organizational commitment as a “tendency to engage in consistent lines of activity as the perceived cost of doing otherwise is greater” while Porter et al. (1974) described it as “the strength of an individual’s identification with and involvement in a particular organization.”
Allen and Mayer, 1990, (p.14) defined “…….A psychological state that binds the individual to the organization (i.e., makes turnover less likely)”. People having high level of organizational commitment are supposed to be highly productive at work with a superior wisdom of duty and devotion (Ulrich, 1998)
Organiatioanl commitment of individuals is one of the major concern for today’s HR mangers based on the strategic assosiation between Organiztioanl commitment and employee performance. Organizatioanl commitment is a complicated phnoemenan as it relies upon different factors for individuals at different hierachal level of the organization. It is therefore important for the mangers of an enterprise to cope with this challenge strategically.
Allen and Meyer (1990) suggest that commitment can take three different forms...
... middle of paper ...
...econd part explicitly describes the scheme of research methods, including data collection, measurements, and statistics. The third part gives the analysis results of the present study and corresponding discussion with some of the reasons and explanations. The final part concludes the findings of the study and points both theoretical and managerial contributions, and presents suggestions for future research and the limitations of the study.
De-Limitations of the Study
As all the variables of present study are directly related with human behavior and discovering human behavior is one of the complex tasks for HR manager. Highly competitive and turbulent upbringings in the business industry may restrict this study to generalize the consequences. Respondents usually do not response with full attention towards it. Time and cost is another limitation for this study.
... Factors affecting employees’ organizational commitment–a study of banking staff in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam. Journal of Advanced Management Science 2(1), 7-11
... Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991-1007. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991
Sabir, S., Sohail, A., & Khan, M. A. (2011). Impact of Leadership Style on Organization Commitment: In A Mediating Role of Employee Value. Journal of Economics & Behavioral Studies, 3(2), 145-152.
Of the several theories we have discussed involving commitment, I have taken a particular interest in M.P. Johnson’s Theory of Commitment as I feel it very effectively dissects the primary drives that reside behind one’s desire, or lack thereof, to remain committed in a relationship. In his theory, Johnson describes three kinds of perceived commitment that ultimately lead one to the decision to stay in their relationship. These three kinds of commitment discussed are personal, moral and structural commitment (Berscheid & Regan, 2005).
In an era of organizational flux due to competition and globalization, companies and employees are faced with constant change. Leaders must be able to adapt to change as the environment shifts. HR has been known as the organizational change agent, administrative expert, and employee advocate. More recently they have been regarded as business strategic partners for many organizations. In order to be successful and remain competitive in today’s market, Human Resources (HR) must be considered a strategic partner if an organization wants to flourish. Top executives today commit significant resources to ensure that their company’s functions are capable of rapid change and achieving their goals. Far too often, the Human Resources (HR) function is nominal thus they are not as quick to respond to the rapid rate of change. When “this occurs, companies may be perpetuating or even creating barriers to fully leveraging their human capital. Organizations can begin the process of removing these barriers by assessing the Human Resources function and its alignment with business objectives” (Wert & Liwanag , 2002). This paper will make a case for having HR report to the CEO. In order to do so the author will describe the relationship between HR strategies and business strategies. Examples of HR strategies that can be effective will be discussed. In addition, the author will examine the benefits and consequence of having HR as a strategic partner and well as the key business competencies that they must retain. Furthermore, she will discuss an optimal career path for a senior HR executive.
The importance of Human Resource management is associated with the beginning of mankind. As the knowledge of survival had begun including safety, health, hunting and gathering, tribal leaders passed on the knowledge to their youth. However more advanced HRM functions were developed as early as 1000 B.C and 2000 B.C. Since the modern management theory took over, the working environment was transformed into a more friendly and safe work place. The workers were termed as most valuable resources. While some companies took the human side of employment seriously, there were others who did not find it mandatory. Hence they faced huge labor unions and factory shut downs (Henning, 2001).
Whether an organization consists of five or 25,000 employees, human resources management is vital to the success of the organization. HR is important to all managers because it provides managers with the resources – the employees – necessary to produce the work for the managers and the organization. Beyond this role, HR is capable of becoming a strong strategic partner when it comes to “establishing the overall direction and objectives of key areas of human resource management in order to ensure that they not only are consistent with but also support the achievement of business goals.” (Massey, 1994, p. 27)
Ulrich, D., Younger, J., and Brockbank, W. 2008. “The twenty-first century HR organization.” Human Resource Management, 47, pp.829-850.
In the past 20 years, the technology has been improving as well as the behavior of human. Another change that has been significant enough in the workforce is the generation. Since the baby boomers is reaching the retirement ages, the workforce changes its face. During the change of the pace there are many issues regarding the younger generation. Though, the unprepared new labor force brings another issues to the most company. As the new age begin, the company is struggling with the high demand of spending and low output level from the employees. This event challenges the human resource management on the search of potential employees. The consideration breed the pros and cons whether to keep, train and improve or recruit and change the force. The essay will provides the thorough exploration to oversee the positives of developing dedication of the employees. The method will be used are research and case discussion. The objective of the written report is to provide an insight of the importance of loyalty from the employees.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Empowerment is a simple idea, but often misunderstood or misused by many. "It means granting latitude of action for how the work is done to those who do the work.” (R.E Sibson, Strategic Planning for Human Resources Management). This paper will define, describe and discuss Employee Empowerment used in today’s team based organizations. The paper looks at how this concept affects the company's diverse workforce. I will discuss the potential impact of these practices and the performance.
It represents the Strategic human resource management (SHRM) core function like “work analysis, Job design and job analysis” defines its importance in strategies implementation in any organization. This assignment will also discuss the aspect of Human Resource department that why they are giving more edge to other functions like Recruitment and selection, Performance appraisal and Occupational health and safety. This report will also presents the today’s critical business challenges and the with coming new responsibilities for HR and why they have started to give more weightage to Job analysis and design in order to get the better output and efficiency of the organization. Moreover, Human capital is a vital factor for any department in any organization. “Hiring smart” is becoming a fashion trend for companies for their effectiveness, productivity and employee motivation as the more investment will be done in employees by the firms. It continues with the recommendations on the need of analysis and design of work and how to make employees motivated in the company.
In this chapter, the researcher discusses further on research methodology used in the current research to achieve the research objectives as previously highlighted in Chapter One. This chapter will discuss on research design, population, sampling design and data collection method.
Additionally, employee satisfaction are directly correlated to employee commitment and the loyalty which again directly related with the business and work productivity (Papazisi, Raidén, and Sheehan, 1995). Smart leaders knows that keeping their employee satisfied and motivated are essential for their organization (Sher, Bakhtiar, Muhammad &Ali, 2010).
One of the causes that influences an organization’s human resource is its strategy. A strategy refers to a plan that in place to guide business operations and activities. The business strategy then provides schedules and activities for the employee, and as a result affects the human resource. The scope is to build on qualifications and capabilities, therefore influences human resource to higher capacity while the unsuitable distribution of tasks may dampen human resource to poor results. Managers in the organization play a significant role in influencing human resource. The type of leadership structure and leadership style implemented by the organization establishes the level of encouragement that a leader and their leadership have on human resource. An ineffective leadership will fail to mobilize human resource into performing required tasks due to poor control of employees. Effective leadership influences human resource management responses to the management’s needs towards competitiveness. Ammi, F. T., & Mushatt, S.