The Supreme Court should should affirm that the State of Texas has standing to challenge the immigration executive orders that have been placed as it has sustained multiple injuries that were caused by DAPA. DAPA directly imposed substantial costs associated with issuing additional driver’s licenses; it also required additional health care, law enforcement, and education expenditures. Even if only a small fraction of DAPA recipients applied for driver’s licenses, Texas would incur millions of dollars in costs and it would hurt its state economy. These injuries would easily allow Texas establish standing for any ordinary litigant. In addition Rumsfeld v. Forum for Acad. & Inst. Rights, Inc held that “One party with standing is sufficient to satisfy Article III’s case-or-controversy requirement.” The opposition claims Texas does not have standing as it can avoid the harms that is caused by DAPA through a change of policy or behavior and that the injuries it sustained aren’t enough to get standing. They claim, Texas could avoid the driver’s-license-cost injury only by changing its policy and making driver’s licenses less …show more content…
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) generally requires a federal agency or branch to provide public notice and an opportunity for comment on any proposed rule and the president did not do this. Moreover, Nat’l Park Hospitality Ass’n v. Dep’t of Interior states that an agency action must be tentative to count as a general statement of policy. DAPA is not tentative at all. It was immediately implemented and states began granting Expanded-DACA permits to over 100,000 aliens in under three months. This has put a definite strain on the nation’s resources, especially finance-wise. So, putting in a nationwide injunction on these executive orders will help slow down the naturalization process and help the states adjust their finances
- If all of the options were explored, and patient is given antibiotics and is treated without any pain or suffering than the treatment identifies with the ethnical principles of autonomy, non-maleficence, and veracity. In turn, Mrs. Dawson will be happy with the outcome of the procedure.
At the start of September, Donald Trump terminated a program and in turn put fear into the hearts of nearly 800,000 people and their friends and family. Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, was a program that was made to replace the DREAM Act (a policy that was not approved by Congress which would have created a path towards citizenship for “illegal” immigrants that came to the United States as children). DACA was put into effect in 2012 by former President Barack Obama through an executive order. This policy protects immigrants who, as children, were either illegally brought to the United States or were brought legally but then stayed past their visas’ expiration dates. DACA provides this specific group of immigrants with protection from deportation, a social security number, and a work permit; however, it is not a way of gaining legal status. Not only are the qualifications for eligibility specific and limiting, but the application process itself is expensive, extensive, long, and it has to be done every two years.
The hard fact is that sometimes we must make decisions we do not like. We make them because they are right, right in the sense that the law and the Constitution, as we see them, compel the result — Justice Kennedy concurring, Texas v Gregory Lee Johnson
The final clause of the first section of the fourteenth amendment explains, "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." 2 The 1976 ruling of Gregg v....
The opposing argument serves as a perfect gateway to the topic of relationship between Federal and State government. In the United States, the Supremacy Clause serves...
“Grounds of admissibility and deportability are the core of U.S. immigration law” (Boswell, 125). They are the core because they regulate who is allowed to enter or remain in the United States. When it comes to submitting waivers of inadmissibility, the process can sometime be lengthy. Thus is, because the reason an individual was deemed inadmissible is taken into consideration and further investigated. In the end, the Attorney General is the one who makes the final decision to either allow or deny an individual entry into the United States. Overall, the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is crucial when it comes to controlling each and every aspects of
"State Medical Marijuana Laws." Legislative News, Studies and Analysis. National Conference of State Legislatures, 2014. Web. Apr. 2014. .
is a progression from the U.S. Supreme court to support states’ rights in large part due to
Trump's executive orders are similar to the Alien and Sedition Acts. The Alien and Sedition acts were passed during John Adam's presidency in order to prepare for war with France. What the acts did was increase the time required for a person to have stayed in the U.S to obtain citizenship from 5 years to 14 years. It also required the person to tell their intents in the country 5 years prior to getting citizenship. Additionally, the acts prohibited anybody from publishing anything that was deemed scandalous or malicious towards the government, and that the president count deport anyone deemed unsafe to the country. These acts were aimed at making it harder for immigrants to obtain U.S citizenship, much like President Trump is doing with his
This thriving constitutional controversy has been in the discussions by a majority of the Supreme Court decisions. Although the United State...
Currently, there are 11.7 million undocumented immigrants in the United States; 6 million of those immigrants are Mexican-born (Preston). Within that undocumented population are individuals who were brought to the States as children. These individuals have grown up in the American culture and consider themselves American, but struggle with being treated as second class citizens due to their undocumented status. On June fifteenth of 2012, the Obama Administration announced the executive order Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). This order will allow immigrants who were brought illegally to the U.S. as children to apply for work permits and avoid deportation (Hennessey and Bennett). President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals is not only beneficial to it applicants but also to the United States as a whole.
With the recent ordeal with Denton’s fracking induced water pollution many are shook to the core with the realizations that there nothing they can do to change the states ruling. Meanwhile, the state knows that they are dancing on the fine line of “pose[ing] a bigger risk of enacting laws that infringe on individual rights” (Renaldi). Especially with their ruling to ban the ban of fracking. Despite the direct harm to the people of Denton. Denton had over 14,000 signatures to end the harmful fracking. 1 “There seems to be an attitude that big state government knows better than the citizens of a city. 2 I just think — conservative or liberal — that is something you don’t do in Texas” ( Roden). In many ways, this was another way the state showed their ever-growing superiority over local governments. They said their reason was because the ban posed ‘infringement’ over private property even with the city ban. However there’s a law that states “ Junked vehicles. Municipal ordinances that provide for the abatement and removal
The court’s decision to recommend that KDCP provide $400,000 worth of free SAT test prep would benefit the less fortunate students that could not afford the costly test prep course, the parents of those students, KDCP and College Board. The losing side of this settlement are the students that worked hard to study for the SAT without using a test prep service to earn their scores. Using the utilitarian perspective in order for the settlement to be ethically recommendable, the most parties possible would be happier with the outcome. In other words, the greatest good for the greatest number (Brusseau, 2012, p.55).
The actions of these executive orders are not overreaching. President Obama aimed to allow hardworking immigrants such as the recipients of the DREAM Act and their parents to begin the journey down the pathway to citizenship. These immigration orders were intended for families, not all immigrants. Criminals would be deported, and strict background checks would be enforced in order to be eligible. A person has to have been in the country for at least five years, they must register with the government, and border security would have also increased. The same “high moral standing required of DREAM Act students” would have “been required for all immigrants in order to fall within the parameters of these executive orders” (Transcript). This is not overreaching, it is a compromise for both democrats and republicans. Increased deportations and border security appeal to the Republican Party, while Democratic planks such as the legalization of immigrants are met. These are the people who have been in the country for half a decade, enough time to put down roots, make friends, and become a part of life here in America. The country would not be what it is today without immigrants, and treating them poorly gets the nation nowhere. Unfortunately, the president’s immigration reforms are tied up in the Supreme Court, as politicians in Washington cannot remove themselves from the gridlock long enough to observe what is best for the nation. Claims of illegality will keep the executive orders paused, and “Washington would have to pour even more resources into already dysfunctional immigration bureaucracies”
The PDSA cycle is a tool used to improve performance. It is made up of a series of steps that is designed to increase a person’s ability. Step one is to plan. Within the planning stage you must define the system, access the current situation and analyze causes. The second step is to do. Within this step, you will the test on a small scale. Eventually you will be trying out the improvement theory that you have come up with. The next study in which you set aside an amount of time to where the subject matter can be properly analyzed. The fourth step is to act in which you care to change based on what you’ve learned from past experience. In addition you will standardize the plan as well as plan for the. As a pediatrician I will ask if parents are