At first glance, Laura’s decision to leave her position at the manufacturing company seems to be quite surprising. As her description states, there is no single obvious reason that compelled her to leave. However, this need not be the case for an employee to decide to leave their job. As the model of employee turnover by Johns and Saks shows, there is a complex relationship between many attitudes, elements and situational factors that goes into an employee’s decision to leave their company (Johns & Saks, 2014, p. 138). This analysis will chiefly examine Laura’s level of job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behaviour, and finally organizational commitment in an effort to discern why Laura could have decided to leave her workplace. To …show more content…
Her levels of absenteeism were almost nonexistent and her performance levels were good, which both have a correlation and causation with satisfaction (Johns & Saks, 2014, p. 136-138). However, there is one salient detail in her description that could explain a lower level of job satisfaction. Laura has almost completed a degree in accounting, which ostensibly was not a prerequisite for her position. Mentally challenging work, adequate compensation and meaningful career opportunities are three key contributors to job satisfaction (Johns & Saks, 2014, p. 134). Given that Laura has nearly completed her post secondary education, it is reasonable to infer that her current position does not offer her work that is stimulating for her intellectual capability, compensation that reflects her new level of education, nor advancement opportunities that her degree should have opened. So, despite an overall apparent satisfaction, there are clearly some facets that prevented Laura from being overly satisfied. Although there is a detectable relationship between lower levels of job satisfaction and higher turnover rates, the decision to quit one’s job rests on many different factors. Attitudes of an employee towards job satisfaction and organizational commitment play a role, but a shock to the life of an employee …show more content…
Alongside job satisfaction, it is one of the two key attitudes in the workplace that affects an employee’s decision to quit their job. Organizational commitment is defined as “an attitude that reflects the strength of the linkage between an employee and an organization” (Johns & Saks, 2014, p. 140). By the definition alone, it is clear that this attitude would play an important role in causing someone to remain at their current position. Conversely, low levels of organizational commitment would mean that employees would not likely hesitate to leave their job. Three types of organizational commitment exist: affective, continuance, and normative. The difference between the three is simply the motivation for the commitment to the organization. Affective commitment reflects an intrinsic desire to stay with the organization stemming from identity and involvement, continuance commitment is the need to stay with an organization, and normative commitment stems from an ideological or feeling of obligation to remain (Johns & Saks, 2014, p.
Recruitment becomes a greater challenge in organizations with high turnover due to the increased number of vacancies. Nationwide, only 14% of employees feel satisfied with their jobs (Clawson & Haskins, 2011). This lack of satisfaction can...
... Factors affecting employees’ organizational commitment–a study of banking staff in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam. Journal of Advanced Management Science 2(1), 7-11
... Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991-1007. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991
Some of the things that companies could do to improve job satisfaction for example, would be to identify when an employee is bored on the job, address it, obtain feedback from the employee for ideas to make their job more interesting and challenging. This would allow a leader to assist this individual in designing different ways to perform duties or depending on individual’s future career goals and performance level, may need more responsibility or promotion in order for the employee to maintain job satisfaction and retention with t...
Allen,N.J. and Meyer, J.P. (1990) `The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization' Journal of occupational Psychology in L. Fulop and S. Linstead, Management: A Critical Text, Macmillan, South Yarra, 1999, pp 259
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603–609. doi:10.1037/h0037335
It’s amazing just how many highly experienced and qualified executives I have met over the years who are unsatisfied at work. I’ve spent countless hours exploring why this occurs and looking for patterns. If we are discovering ways to retain talent, it is important to understand why these individuals change jobs in the first place.
The two concepts that I found most relate to my personal experiences with job dissatisfaction in Corrections are organizational commitment and turnover. Organizational Commitment Organization Commitment relates to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction in Corrections because when an employee no longer feels committed to the organization
Employee turnover represents a practical problem to an organization in terms of loss of talent and additional recruitment and training cost. Only a few studies have explored the effects on intention to leave (i.e. Daily & Kirk 1992) . Therefore, the underlying process through with organizational perception leads to employee turnover remain largely unknown. I am not going to consider gender, age or race in this study. I am not going to consider individual employee titles. I am not going to study samples of over 60 people. I am not going to divide HR non-exempt employees by individual HR departments.
Farrell, D., & Rusbult, C. E. (1981). Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Organizational behavior and human performance, 28(1), 78-95.
Moreover, to discover the influence of employee engagement on their organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intention because of these leadership practices. Leadership
yes but the level appears that the level of satisfaction from employees with their place of employment seem to be dropping because of pay and promotion. Pay and Promotion are some of the major factors when an employee becomes unsatisfied with their position at their place of employment. Many employers are expecting more work from employees and are not being valued with more money or a more value based title. This is where Organizational commitment falls in an employee may feel the need to be committed to an organization based on the employee’s attachment to the place of employment. Many places of employment are now trying to see how they can better their place of employment for employees in order for them to be more committed to the organization. At my job we now have employment satisfaction surveys that come out every six months for employees. In these surveys the employee must answer a series of questions pertaining to how they feel about the job and its environment. This is an excellent way for the employees to voice their concerns as well as have the company listen to their concerns. This was also seen in the textbook and explained, Effective commitment is an emotional attachment to the organization and a belief in its values; while she disliked the job for whatever reasons, she did like her coworkers and had formed genuine friendships, so it was harder for her to exit because she had an emotional attachment to the
However Kanungo (1982) distinguished between employee dedication and job involvement. In his distinction, he characterizes the primary difference between employee dedication and job involvement as based on the fact that whereas employee dedication refers to a sense of consistency and commitment to a cause (in this case the job), whereas job involvement denotes an individual’s psychological identification with a particular job or with work in general (Kanungo, 1982). Additionally, both concepts (employee dedication and job involvement) are regarded as related and fairly stable phenomena. This is as the difference between both concepts is not as clear cut as it may appear and has not been clearly argued. However, employee dedication is observed to be a broader concept and to entail much more than job involvement because dedication comprises of feelings of pride, hope, inspiration, and challenge, whereas job involvement is more concerned with the psychological relevance of the job in the workers life (Mauno et al.,
The model suggests that organizational commitment is related to a physiological state of the employee. (Cohen 2003; Cooper-Hakim and Viswesvaran, 2005; Morrow 1993). The model categorizes commitment into three different measures that reflect how employees feel about their work place; affective commitment, continuance commitment and normative commitment (Anon, 2017). Organizational commitment along with job satisfaction represent two half’s of what expert’s call ‘overall job attitude.' Affective organizational commitment is the employees ‘emotional’ attachment to their involvement and identification with the organization. A psychological bond is formed whereby the employee has decided to be dedicated and responsible to the organization. Text book page 118 This ‘feeling is often interpreted as employee loyalty but is arguably suggested that loyalty and affective commitment differ in definition.