Competing On Analytical Summary

1310 Words3 Pages

According to the book Competing on Analytics, there are four pillars of analytical competition. These are distinctive capability, enterprise-wide analytics, senior management commitment and large-scale ambition. In order for ESPN to stay ahead of its competitors, it has always had the distinctive capabilities to create talent (sports analysts of the highest quality), understand that live television is the most valuable and produce content that surpasses all of its competitors. Fortunately, ESPN has always been able to make its sports-rights-buying one of its distinctive capabilities; however, with new media companies coming into the mix it now does not have the luxury of maintaining its sports-rights-buying as one of its distinctive capabilities. …show more content…

Nationally, ESPN attempts to employ this quality but there are still too many decisions being made without any analytical approach. The hiring of talent is an example where ESPN does not use analytics to make sound decisions. This has led to an overpaying of individuals who were not giving the company value or strengthening it. In turn, as we have seen this year, ESPN has had to have many layoffs in order to restructure its budget. This goes hand-in-hand with senior management commitment, which just now understands the need of being an analytically driven decision maker. John Skipper, CEO of ESPN, demonstrated this through his decision to renew the show “First Take”, which he has admitted to not liking but understands the value it brings based on sales revenue and ratings. The fourth pillar is large scale ambition. ESPN positions itself as a sports media giant, but lately has not been able to keep up with changing video streaming and digital demand. Therefore, ESPN does not yet possess large scale ambition, because analytically part of the company has known that it needed to begin making changes towards a more digital world long …show more content…

Based on my discussion about where ESPN lands within each pillar, I would place it under stage number four: Analytical companies. ESPN is currently changing its strategies based on analytical input provided through ratings, impressions and consumer behavior/feedback. They are innovating new technology to broaden their overall reach and adapt to changing consumer consumptions. However, they do not make the best use of this information and use it more as a feedback tool than a trend predictor. The reason being that they have not yet made it to stage five is that the analytical strategy is fragmented throughout the company. There are senior executives implementing analytics as their number one decision maker and there are senior executives that choose to disregard this focus and use more “gut based” decision making. This leads to a broken distinctive capability and the company does not take full advantage of its analytical strategy. I strongly believe that ESPN is capable of reaching stage 5 soon, but it is something that will only happen when everyone is on board with the analytical strategy. The mentality of everyone has to be that of being an analytical competitor, not just

Open Document