Comparing Atonement In Julian's Showings And Anselm Of Canterbury

1792 Words4 Pages

Throughout the history of Christianity, theologians have been investigating the nature of sin and paths for atonement, delving into the foundational beliefs of their religion. Modern thinkers grapple with many of the same questions, but the roots of their arguments lie deep in the texts of medieval writers who stood at the forefront of religious thought, such as Julian of Norwich and Anselm of Canterbury. In Julian’s Showings and Anselm’s Cur Deus Homo, both writers present interpretations of sin and the consequent methods of atonement through an analysis of the relationship between God and humanity. While both texts endeavor to determine the connections between God, sin, atonement and humanityespecially through the use of metaphors and parables there are marked definitions between them. While Anselm of Canterbury focuses on the effects of sin on …show more content…

To Anselm, sinning is the act of going against against the natural leaning of the universethat which serves God and results in beauty and goodness (Anselm 124). He also emphasizes the weight of sin, putting a sinful choice in the eyes of an omniscient God in context by asking his companion in discourse, Boso, to imagine going against a command from God while standing directly in front of a physical manifestation of God (139). Julian has a similar attitude towards the nature of sin, defining it as “all which is not good, and the shameful concept and the dearest tribulation which [Christ] endured for [mankind] in this life, and his death and all his pains” (Julian 225). Both authors also connect humanity’s sins back to the goodness of God. Anselm states that we cannot see or understand the source of God’s mercy or goodness because the reason is hidden in “the heights of his goodness,” which are incomprehensible to us, and Julian’s similar belief is that “[God] constantly works to bring us into endless peace” (Anselm 78-79; Julian

Open Document