Compare And Contrast Thoreau And Merton

682 Words2 Pages

Nature vs. Technology: The Views of Thoreau and Merton
In the year 1854, the famous writer and poet Henry David Thoreau wrote about his experience at Walden. His secluded pond allowed for him to reflect on nature and its impact on community in a passage he named, “Where I Lived, and What I Lived For”. He also wrote two short but important proposals for land preservation around 1858. In the year 1963, famous writer and theologian Thomas Merton wrote a letter to Rachel Carson discussing her book Silent Spring in which she exposed the danger of DDT which was previously thought harmless. In 1967 in the time of the cold war and the space race, Merton wrote a letter to Barbra Hubbard about human ecological responsibility in space. Merton and Thoreau …show more content…

In his mind he practices buying land and what he would say to the current land owners. He believed that wherever he sat could be his home, his “sedes”. He intentionally makes this point in order to create the picture of the home as a seed, growing out of the ground. He continues to say that the only home he ever really had was when he bought the Hollowell Place. Over the years, Thoreau had taken many voyages up the river to view the house in all of its glory. To paint a picture of the land, Thoreau says, “the house was concealed behind a dense grove of red maples though which I headed the house-dog bark,” (Walden,1997). This image conveys the livelihood of the farm which is destroyed by the farmer who owned the farm before Thoreau. At the point when Thoreau wishes to buy the farm it had changed greatly, become grey and broken down. There were no longer trees, or rabbits eating vegetation in the spring. For Thoreau’s purposes, it is dead. Thoreau sees the farmers, “improvements”, the “getting out some rocks, cutting down the hollow apple trees, and grubbing up some young birches which had sprung up in the pasture,” as detriments (Walden, 1997). Thoreau wanted to buy the property so the farmer couldn’t ruin it any further. He believes that by planting his “sedes” there, he can make the land grow again. He says that he isn’t afraid to let nature be nature. He presents the dichotic images of the poet and the farmer. The poet can look at the land and, “put his farm in rhyme, the most admirable kind of invisible fence, has fairly impounded it, milked it, skimmed it and got all the cream, and left the farmer only the skimmed milk,” (1997). The poet takes in all of the beauty of the land and can walk away with it, whereas the farmer, who cannot see the beauty of the land is left with only a crop of a few apples, bound to be

Open Document