College athletes work non stop to play professionally, when it reality most wont, but these college athletes should be compensated from the millions of dollars colleges make. It is understandable that they will receive payment when the go to the next level, but while they are in college they either need to set up a trust fund or receive direct payment from the big business that the NCAA is. They are commonly referred to as the “cartel.” (Louis Barbash). They receive this alias because they are in charge and have a lot in decisions colleges make. College athletes receive so much attention and bring so much to their schools that they should receive payment one way or another.
...letes are treated un-fairly and more so treated like slaves with the amount of work they have to do, regarding school and their sport. College athletes deserve to be paid because they have continuously risk their time, bodies, and lives to help universities.
...oday because of the time it takes to participate in practice, games, and off season workouts for each sport. When watching pro sports, you will notice at the end of games that athletes from the losing team do not appear to be as disappointed in losing as college athletes. Sometimes when watching, fans believe that this reason is because pro athletes do not care as much because they still will get paid at the end of the day. This could be an effect on college sports if student athletes are paid. Many things that could alter college athletics is what interests me most about this topic and hopefully will help others become more informed of the situation on both sides.
Everyone deserves pay for any job and college athletes are no exception. Not paying them or taking care of them properly certainly surmounts to abuse and misuse. Moreover, when the athletes face wear and tear, their privileges are taken away and they are left to fend for themselves for the rest of their lives; it can be very devastating for these athletes. The athletes should be compensated for the hard work they do. Life is about give and take. So the competition should be higher, for if they are paid for what they are doing, they would be greatly motivated in their work. Therefore, I strongly admonish that they should get paid for all the time and effort they spend on sports.
There has always been a debate on whether college athletes should be paid in addition to their tuition. Many may believe that the athletes deserve this extra pay, but I certainly disagree. I think that college athletes should not get special treatment because of their athletic abilities. I also believe that it would be unfair to students that do not have the ability to participate in athletics. College athletes should not get paid because only certain players play, some colleges can not afford to pay athletes, school is about getting an education, and it is not fair to the students that are not capable of playing a sport.
College athletes already receive thousands of dollars in grants and scholarships to pay for their college which for a lot of people is better than having a job. Being able to go to college in the year 2017 for free is a humongous advantage. Who needs to be paid a little bit each month when they will be leaving college
The NCAA should continue to not pay college athletes because of the many complications that would go along with giving every player pay for play. According to Mark Guarino in his article “NCAA and college sports: Is it time to pay athletes to play?”, Kain Colter, the former Northwestern quarterback says that he spent 60 hours a week on football-related activities during the summer and 40 to 50 hours a week during the season, all while trying to manage school work, and says that “We’re brought to the university to play football.” This being said, the students take football very seriously, more serious than their schoolwork. They treat football as if it is their job but they are working for
Recently the NCAA has been under a lot of pressure over the issue of paying college athletes in return for the extreme amount of revenue and wealth brought to the university by being successful on national television. The dispute has brought up issues on both sides of the controversy as to what should happen with the millions of dollars student athletes generate through the highly publicized and money making games and tournaments in college sports. The major money making sports in college athletics are undoubtedly football and men’s basketball. These two sports combined have year round ESPN and national television coverage which creates multi-billion dollar revenues that the schools rake in. So the question remains, why should high profile student athletes not be paid for their accomplishments on the field or court? There is a strict line between an amateur and a pro which
The common belief of this side is that college athletes deserve to make money for creating a billion dollar business for the NCAA due to money making things like sponsorships, televised games, and merchandise. One man who believes athletes should be paid is writer Marc Edelman, who says that student-athletes should be paid because “the typical Division I college football player devotes 43.3 hours per week to his sport -- 3.3 more hours than the typical American work week” (Edelman). Edelman, and others with similar beliefs regarding the NCAA no pay policy think it’s absolutely ridiculous and unfair that college football players work longer than the average American worker and receive no pay. Even though student-athletes like American workers create money for their company, college players are still not paid. Another issue many people on this side have with the NCAA rule preventing athletes from getting paid is that many lawsuits and investigations have occured because of this one single rule.
There are over 400,000 college athletes who can look forward to a life of poverty and injury after college.College athletes often have problems later on in life. They also go into poverty.The schools also get all the money.College athletes should be paid for putting there body on the line while representing their school.
Experts have said that most ‘regular’ students wouldn’t want to be a student athlete “if they knew everything that it entailed”, such as long days, busy schedules, no free time (Newton) (Pattern 4). However, even though they are students first, athletes second, that doesn’t mean that being an athlete is their job. Other college students can be paid for their work, so athletes should be paid for their work as well. Other people may say that college athletes shouldn’t be paid since they are getting a free education through scholarships.
College Athletes and Money Many people debate over the topic on whether college athletes should receive compensation by their universities for participating in athletic activities. This question has sparked controversy as many people feel it is right for these hard-working athletes to receive money. However, there are also many people who feel the schools do enough for the athletes, and should not pay them. In my opinion, college athletes should receive compensation by their universities for playing sports because the athletes contribute greatly to the university’s income, and would receive what they deserve, and the athletes may stay all four years of college instead of declaring to play professionally.
College players receive an athletic scholarship which pays for the education, but nothing else. The majority of football and basketball players can not afford food, and some can’t even afford college. Getting a full scholarship is undoubtedly a very valuable opportunity for the players to have a fantastic education, but many division one student athletes go for sports rather than education. Many people see the games these players play, but don’t see them at school. These student athletes have a full schedule full of their sport, and little time for their education. Division One basketball, and football athletes, should be paid because they are the ones who make the NCAA money and they
College athletes have gained a lot of popularity among Americans in the past few decades. This has resulted with an increasing revenues for National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and not just NCAA but the colleges as well. However, one side is not getting any profit, and that side is college athletes. College and basketball programs earn billions of dollars each year through marketing, broadcast contracts, ticket sales and merchandising. The March Madness basketball tournament alone earns more than $1 billion each year in ad revenues, far more than the Superbowl. Schools and the (NCAA) both benefit tremendously from the windfall, as do coaches, many of whom are paid more than a million dollars each year. But the athletes themselves? They do not get a penny. The question becomes, why should they get paid? Reasons for they are; they spent tremendous time on practices, they struggle to earn
College athletes should be paid because they are basically working for the school. When a student gets a scholarship to a college for a sport they are expected to practice with the team and without the team, so on their free time. College athletes go way over the maximum amount of hours they are allowed to practice with the team. A 2011 survey, from the article Should College Athletes Be Paid?, states “The NCAA has a limit of 20 hours of training per week, D1 football players on average practice 43 hours a week, baseball 42.1 hours a week, and men’s basketball 39.2 hours a week”(Walch). With