Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Norman conquest short note
Norman conquest short note
The influence of Norman conquest
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Whilst Henry VI’s was in rule during the 1450’s, England had many issues and problems that cause such instability in the country. One of the largest factors arguably is the loss of the Hundred Years war between The French and English over France. This in turn caused many problems to occur with links to almost every feud the country faced. Yet some historians argue that Normandy wasn’t the main issue of instability in England instead of other reasons such as instability. In England, political instability was due to the nobles (who advise the king in his decisions and fund the crown if needed) using Henry VI’s and the crown’s crippling debt for their own gains. An example of misguidance for Henry for the nobles’ gains, an example is Richard Duke …show more content…
This revolt was in 1450 when William de la Pole, 1st Duke of Suffolk was exiled and killed in travel. Many believed that the people of Kent were responsible and so this led many citizens to storm London. When Cade’s Rebellion was in full effect, Henry VI fled from London which showed the people how weak the king was and how little it took to push the crown to such extremes. To make matters worse, Jack Cade, who was predicted to run the rebellion, had a rumoured to be related to Richard Duke of York, which caused the common people to think that the government isn’t a polished and well-rounded system that they were made to believe which later showed the exposure of other nobles like [fill in]. Even the matter that a rebellion occurred showed how instable England was even before Normandy was lost. Although there are many examples of extreme factors that contributed to instability of England. Other historians talk say that the loss of Normandy did have a huge effect on England and English rule at the time and still is the major contributor to the Battle of St. Albans which would be the start of War of the …show more content…
This is because of many refugees that occurred from the lost as they were citizens that had moved to France during the success of the Hundred Year War. This meant that there was a rapid increase in population causing homelessness to occur and this made the already poor to rich ratio incline quickly meaning it meant more citizens looking for jobs. It also meant a shortage on food since most of the refugees went to big cities for work and housing. This made the general population question their king since little to no support was ever shown by Henry VI as he still had to sort out many feuds with the nobles to keep a steady income for the crown, not to mention the support for Henry VI
The French revolted due to political, economic, and social injustices. Politically, the government was a mess. An absolute ruler can only be beneficial to the people if they cater to
The causes of the two rebellions and the threats they pose are a response to the failure of the Lord Protector to rule as an effective leader. However, it is not to be said that is it entirely his fault since many of the problems he or Edward VI had inherited. Though some were simply out of his control like bad harvest other were worsened by his judgements such as the continuation of the war and debasing of the coinage.
Overall, political causes were a constant factor throughout the period, and although socio-economic causes were always present, by the end of the Tudor dynasty they began to decline. Both religion and dynasty both had periods of time when they took precedence in rebellions and were of particular importance. But it is throughout the reigns of both Henry VIII and Elizabeth, when faction became more narrowly focused, that political causes are at their most constant and similar.
Buckingham's rebellion in October 1483 highlighted just how deep his country's mistrust went. Instead of the rebellion been engineered by a high ranking noble (Buckingham only joined the rebellion towards its conclusion) it was now initiated by the common people. Alarming to Richard was the large amount of gentry that joined the rising. The rebellion was quickly crushed however as it was poorly organised and morale broke down within the rebels. Henry Stafford Duke of Buckingham was caught and executed by Richard.
...battle marked the end of the fighting in Northern France. After being pushed out of northern France, Henry VI sent an army to Bordeaux in an attempt to gain at least some territory in France. The French responded by besieging the town of Castillon. In an attempt to lift the siege, the English attack the French force besieging the town. The English are defeated once more and are driven out of both Castillon and Bordeaux. The only remaining English territory in France was the coast of Calais, which remained in English control until the mid 1500s.
For example, two of the largest peasant rebellions in 1381 and 1549 occurred in Norfolk. Both these struggles were mainly concerned with the growing political power of the Lords in Norfolk and local grievances such as enclosure. He also states continuity from the Medieval and Early Modern period because society was structured in a similar way, which means that there is some cross-over in the causes of the rebellions. It is unclear as to how many of those involved in the Kett’s rebellion understood it’s connection to the Peasant’s Revolt, but a main similarity is that they show that peasants could revolt and form an uprising equal in size to those which had gentry involvement. Furthermore, Wood draws attention to the traditional nature of popular protest and rebellion between the Western Rebellion 1549 and the Pilgrimage of Grace 1536 due to the shared religious grievances. This would suggest that the subordinate groups in Early Modern England had similar grievances which could be found in various rebellions, supporting the belief that rebellion and popular protest was the only way for them to get their voices heard. It also suggests that members of authority did not pass legislation to help deal with grievances such as taxation, enclosure and religious instability which may imply that they did not perceive these issues as being particularly serious
Henry V is not a simple one as it has many aspects. By looking into
In addition to this, the cost of running a government in general had gone up and the country needed more money. Because the king didn't have as much power to tax as he pleases, the government could make a firm and accurate taxation of the people. In France, the price of government had also gone up.
...ample. Henry VIII was also responsible for the religious reformation in England and changed the religion of England from the Roman Catholic faith to the Protestant Religion, and established the Church of England. If it weren’t for King Henry VIII, England would not have been as wealthy as it was because of the dissolution of the monasteries. The Act of Appeals aided the constitutional development of England, once again, all thanks to Henry VIII.
Just as any story has a climax; one can deduce that the 17th and 18th centuries were the turning point for most of European history; however, different places experienced this change in different ways. As the previous discoveries and inventions were made by remarkable scientists like Galileo, the Enlightenment was the next logical step in the era. As incredible philosophers like Jean- Jacques Rousseau along with John Locke stepped in, people all over Europe began to realize the importance and even the mere concept of reason and natural rights granted to all persons. Apart from the common impact of the Enlightenment on all of Europe, France further experienced a drastic change in terms of society as well as finance, leading to the mark of a new beginning- The French Revolution. Due to a hierarchical system in France, a vast opposition by the nobility and the commoners grew regarding the old order, which led to take an action against the monarchical regime. As a result of a faster growth in consumer prices over wages, the next scenario was the economic fall of society that included taxes, food shortages and unemployment rates. As the necessity for a rebellion became crucial due to the lack of privilege towards the commoners, with the financial collapse of the French society, coupled with the lasting impact of the philosophes, the main causes of the French Revolution were the unequal hierarchy of the estate system, the growing economic crises, and the ideologies of the Enlightenment.
In addition to the economic issues, France also held an Estate System that led to heavy social inequality. This oppression of the Third Estate along with the financial problems that fell on the common people would lead to the French Revolution. Overall, the people of France revolted against the monarchy because of the unsuccessful estate system and the inequality it led to, because of the new enlightenment ideas that inspired them, and because of the failures of the monarchy. First, the French Revolution was a result of the failed estate system and the extreme economic and social inequality it led to.
Much like Britain and their need for money, King Louis XVI needed money due to causing France to become bankrupt with his costly
This was even worse because he had borrowed from York and instead if paying him back, gave patronage to others. He gave away more and more money and land so that there wasn't much left for important times like war and to make people happy or come onto his side. This was definitely a reason for the outbreak of conflict as York and Somerset had a fight in 1455, as York couldn't approach the king himself (as he was derived from god) he had to fight his evil council. Margaret of Anjou, Henry's wife is also a problem, she has a son who is the heir to the throne, however York wants to be the heir, but as there is a son he can't be, so him and Margaret dislike each other. Richard duke of York is definitely a big reason for the outbreak of the conflict but it isn't just his fault as Henry VI drove him to wanting to fight. Finance is also a big problem because the people had to spend taxes on war, but as it was a failure (especially in France), they had paid money for no reason, and so they would have been very unhappy and possibly feeling
... war effort. “The English crown became increasingly in debt, indeed when Henry V died the crown had a deficit of £30,000 and a debt of £25,000.” The French maintained their focus throughout the war. They had a simple goal that of evicting the English from France. The French were ill served by their leadership during most of the war with the exception of Charles VI, who chose the right strategy for his reign. One of the main reason's for France's eventual victory was the simple fact that France was too large nation for the English to defeat. Realistically, the English never had much hope of defeating France and the English conduct of the war was such that France would stay outraged and continue to fight. One of the largest factors in the overall English defeat in the Hundred Years War was their loss of focus in the strategy they employed during the course of the war.
“Have not a furnace for your foe so hot that it do singe yourself.” (Mabillard 1). The Wars of the Roses was a furnace that was boiling, it caused many changes for England from rebellions and overthrowing multiple kings and queens, to new dynasties and causing England to change for the better with ambition and thus becoming what it is today.