Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The economic and policy development of Ireland
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The economic and policy development of Ireland
There is a long and turbulent past between Ireland and England. Ireland due to the close proximity of the two countries, this closeness makes Ireland a rather strange part of the British Empire, and its history and relations to the British Empire is a rather unique situation. One of the most fascinating aspects beyond the longevity of the subjugation of the Irish under the English, is how the English ruled over their Irish subjects.
This ruling is perhaps best seen (at least in the early days) in the relationship between the Irish and the invading English, who as owners of property and the ability to hold seat of power, were a powerful force in the Irish citizens lives, and their sensibilities dictated much of what was considered right behaviour in Ireland at this time. This relationship is fascinating in part because it speaks of how the English viewed those who lived in their colonies, but also how those in the colonies reacted to the English. In this essay, this relationship will be looked at in depth, through the novel Castle Rackrent by Maria Edgeworth, and through this look, it will be found that the tensions between the Irish and the English were symptoms of an attempt to coerce their Irish subjects to behave as they wished them to, and the Irish refused to do so and resented their English colonizers for their attempt to control and change them.
It is necessary to explain why the term English rather than another moniker has been used in this essay. While it is true that in today's understanding Great Britain is termed so because it is an assembly of England, North Ireland and Scotland, and that at the time of the period in which this essay focuses on Scotland was a part of England, it is simply that much of what takes pl...
... middle of paper ...
...ia Review. no. 4 (2001).
Edgeworth, Maria. Castle Rackrent. New York: The Century Co., 1903.
Egenolf, Susan B. "Maria Edgeworth in Blackface: Castle Rackrent and the Irish Rebellion of 1798." ELH. no. 4 (2005): 845-869.
Graham, Colin. "History, Gender and the Colonial Moment: Castle Rackrent." IRish Studies Review. (1996): 21-24.
Hack, Daniel. "Inter-Nationalism: "Castle Rackrent" and Anglo-Irish Union." Novel: A Forum in Fiction. no. 2 (1996): 145-164.
Jackson, Alvin. "The Irish Act of Union." History Today. no. 1 (2001).
Malcolm, Elizabeth. "A new age or just the same old cycle of extirpation? Massacre and the 1798 Irish rebellion." Journal of Genocide Research. no. 2 (2013): 151-166.
Neill, Michael. "Mantles, Quirks, and Irish Bulls Ironic Guise and Colonial Subjectivity in Maria Edgeworth's Castle Rackrent." The Review of English Studies. no. 205 (2001).
Included within the anthology The Penguin Book of Irish Fiction,1[1] are the works of great Irish authors written from around three hundred years ago, until as recently as the last decade. Since one might expect to find in an anthology such as this only expressions and interpretations of Irish or European places, events or peoples, some included material could be quite surprising in its contrasting content. One such inclusion comes from the novel Black Robe,2[2] by Irish-born author Brian Moore. Leaving Ireland as a young man afforded Moore a chance to see a great deal of the world and in reflection afforded him a great diversity of setting and theme in his writings. And while his Black Robe may express little of Ireland itself, it expresses much of Moore in his exploration into evolving concepts of morality, faith, righteousness and the ever-changing human heart.
Meagher, Timothy. “The Columbia Guide to Irish American History.” Columbia University Press- New York, 2005
The Act of Union in 1800 was a significant factor to the nature of Irish nationalism in 1800. Prior to the Act, the society of the united Irishmen, a republican society who wanted parliamentary reform and Catholic Emancipation, fought, under the leadership of Robert Emmet, with physical force for their complete independence. Because of their military strand they differed from their predecessors the ‘Protestant Patriots’, this is because the society was heavily influenced by revolutionary events in France and New America in the late 18th century. The rebellion, although unsuccessful, with its leader imprisoned, had major consequential effects; which was the passing of the Act of Union in 1800. The Act set the tone for the rest of Irish history; once emancipation failed to materialize directly after the union, the Catholic issue began to dominate both Irish and English politics.
Bone, Martyn. "Ireland Historical Summary 18th-19th Centuries ." Our Family History. Martyn Bone , 11 Mar. 2006. Web. 17 May 2010. .
Throughout my research into the subject of the Irish in England's industrial north during the early nineteenth century, one fact became quite clear; contemporary writers' treatment of the Irish was both minimal and negative. I consulted many sources, Friedrich Engels, Leon Faucher, James Kay-Shuttleworth to name but a few and the reoccurring theme as pertaining to the Irish in all these works was mainly consistent; the Irish were a lazy, vulgar people prone to drinking and brawling.
Westerkamp, Marilyn. Triumph of the Laity: Scots-Irish Piety and the Great Awakening, 1625-1760. New York: Oxford UP, 1988.
It is mentioned in the journal, “The Demographic Factor in Ireland’s Movement towards Partition(1607-1921)” ...
Tudor England viewed Ireland with both fascination and revulsion. While the English regarded the Irish landscape as sublimely beautiful, they also saw it as untamed and uncultured and recognized its inherent threat as a launching base for England’s enemies. The land was seen as unchanging – people live and die, but the land continues to be used. This stability was challenged though by the very instability of its people, who were continuously changing – though from the English view, not towards civility. Never fully conquered, though England had lain territorial claim to Ireland for centuries, the Irish landscape was viewed as ‘in some places wilde and very uncivil.’ Yet, the need to extend English power through physical space made Ireland’s land irresistible. Seen as not simply an affront to the natural order of society, the English perception of Ireland’s femininity allowed for the language of conquest and colonization to be justified. Attempts to bring the land and the people under English rule were an effort to impose the divisions of gender and culture onto Ireland’s landscape as English territory. Consequently, the juxtaposition of these two feelings of enthrallment and loathing that the English held towards the land were mirrored by the same feelings towards Irish women.
The Irish and British governments fought for many years over the ownership of Northern Ireland. Britain had main control over Northern Ireland, and Ireland did not think that was fair. Be...
...reland’s history (Hughes 5). If there hadn’t had been so many breakthroughs for the Irish people, much of their culture would be lost today.
" Moral and Physical Force: The Language of Violence in Irish Nationalism." Journal of British Studies 27 (1988): 150- 189. 23 Sept. 2003 <http://www.jstor.org>
On the 14th of September in the year 1607 the Earl of Tyrone Hugh O’Neill and the Earl of Tyrconnel Rory O’Donnell fled Ireland alongside officials, their families and numerous Gaelic chieftains. They left Ireland from Rathmullen in County Donegal. This flee was to become known as the flight of the Earls. They arrived in the Spanish Netherlands and then eventually made their way to Rome. The Flight of the Earls led to the most drastic form of the British government’s policy of plantation in Ireland. The Flight of the Earls has remained as one of the most memorable events in the history of Ireland. But what exactly were the reasons for the Flight of the Earls? The causes have been debated by historians with different interpretations as to why they fled but it is clear that the influence of the Earls in Ireland have been diminished greatly in the years prior to the Flight of the Earls. This essay seeks to clarify the reasons for the decline in power of the Earls in Ireland through exploration of the solidification of British rule in Ireland, along with key events in the years prior to the Flight of the Earls such as Hugh O’Neill’s campaign and onto the nine years war and the Battle of Kinsale and the Treaty of Mellifont after the Battle of Kinsale.
To undertake a full thematic investigation of this period would be very much beyond the scope of this paper. Thus, the essay will embark on a high level chronological interpretation of some of the defining events and protagonists, which influenced the early modernization of Ireland during the period 1534-1750. The main focus of the paper will concentrating on the impact and supervision of the Tudor dynasty. Firstly, the essay will endeavour to gain an understanding as to what contemporary historians accept as being the concept of modernization during this time period. The paper will then continue by examine the incumbent societal and political structure of Ireland prior to the Tudor conquests. This will have the impact of highlight the modernising effects produced by the subsequent attempts by the Tudors to consolidate and centralise power in the hands of the State. Once more, due to the vast nature of the time period, not every modernizing effect can be examined. Therefore, the paper will concentrate on the modernization of the political landscape, land ownership and the impact this had on the geographic construct of the island.
McCann et al. Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies, 1994, 95-109).