Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chapter 11 Personality Psychology
Chapter 11 Personality Psychology
Theoretical framework of talent management practices – an overview
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chapter 11 Personality Psychology
Looking at retention planning the turnover of talented employees can have a disproportionate impact on an organisation as the employee a company wish to retain are the ones that are most likely to leave in many cases. Read (2001) stated that every worker is five minutes away of handing in their notice and 150 hours away of walking out the door to a brighter offer. There are limits of what an organisation can do to retain as todays workers have few qualms of leaving for a greener pasture. So it is necessary encourage existing talent and in doing so value them accordingly. The theory of organizational equilibrium can shed valuable light on these matters (March & Simon, 1958). According to this theory, an individual will stay within an organisation as long as satisfactory pay, good working conditions, and developmental opportunities are equal to or greater than time and effort required of the person. Moreover, these judgments are affected by both a person’s desire to leave the organisation and the ease with which he or she could depart.
Employees themselves have a role to play as far as retention is concerned; this is because they make the decision on whether to commit to their current organization or to move to another (Okioga, 2012). Organizational commitment refers to an employee’s loyalty to the organization, willingness to exert effort on behalf of the organization, degree of goal with the organization, and a desire to maintain membership (Porter 1976; Bhat & Maheshwari, 2005).
Factors affecting retention are based on the understanding of why employees decide to stay or leave. We can split the significance of employees intentions into different categories for example for employees 30 years old and under career advancement is sig...
... middle of paper ...
...kker et d., 2008).
Work engagement is a motivational–psychological nature, consisting of three dimensions being vigour, dedication and absorption (Schaufeli, Bakker and Salanova 2006) as defined previously. A rising number of studies suggests that work engagement is an undeniable particular construct in need of ongoing study (Bakker and Schaufeli 2008; Macey and Schneider 2008; Meyer and Gagne 2008; Ku¨hnel, Sonnentag and Westman 2009). Schaufeli and Bakker (2010) indicate that while the perception between organizational commitment and work engagement has been discovered, there are no studies demonstrating similar divisions of job satisfaction and work engagement. Difficulties in establishing the discriminant validity of work engagement may reflect the blend of the affective components of job satisfaction with some aspects of engagement, particularly dedication and
Workers feeling, which includes competitive compensation and reward strategies, professional growth and development, career paths and succession plans and the organizations leadership and culture are contributing factors of employee engagement
Employee retention strategies help organizations. They provide effective employee communication to improve commitment and enhance workforce support for key organization initiatives. Retention strategies build customer loyalty by distinguishing and positioning an organization’s unique products and services in today’s crowded marketplace.
A review of employee motivation theories explains the retention and behavior of an employee within the organization. Throughout this essay, I will provide you examples of SAS inc, and how using employee motivation theories can help you succeed. Why is it necessary to keep employees? Fitz-enz (1997) stated that the average company loses approximately $1 million with every 10 managerial and professional employees who leave the organization.(Sunil Ramlall, Book)
What major technology change has had the greatest impact on the quality of your life?
Despite the supportive evidence by validity among 40 samples of Allen and Meyer (1996) scale still some important matters of conceptualization and measurement are pointed out by social scientist. Firstly, if we look into the uniformity of the continuance commitment scale. McGee and Ford (1987) identified two sub-dimensions of continuance commitment. These dimensions were summed as ‘Low job alternatives’ and ‘High personal sacrifice’. The ‘Low job alternatives’ viewed that people do not turnover from the organizations because they do not have other alternative, and ‘High personal sacrifices’ suggests that people stay because they do not want to lose their investments of years which the have spend in the organization relationship for their future (e.g., pension). These finding were studied under the umbrella of dimensionality of continuance commitment by other researches and they also confirmed the above sub dimensions. see (Dunham, Grube, & Castaneda, 1994; Hackett et al., 1994; Meyer, Allen, & Gellatly, 1990; Somers, 1993).
...g employees and keep them committed to the job can be a tough job for organizations and the HR function. Retaining talented individuals that are familiar with their work culture and practices, than making them redundant and recruit them later in future also benefits organizations. As an example we can look at the measures taken by Aer Lingus, who implemented a “leave and return” policy, where they gave employees a lump sum severance payment and made them rejoin on a reduced wage (Gunnigle et al, 2013). This policy is quite important for an organization because rather than taking a more short term approach of cutting jobs and losing on talent and recruiting them again in future, companies should keep long term strategy in mind and look for ways to retain talent within their organization and try adjusting them into different roles, while keeping them motivated enough.
The study of employee voluntary turnover is an important organizational issue that has received great attention for many decades. According to Mobley (1982), when an employee decides to leave, many effects can occur to the organization and to employees. Researchers studying turnover have identified a vast number of variables scattered throughout the turnover and work attitude literature (Griffeth, Hom & Gaertner, 2000; Maertz, & Griffeth, 2004). According to Steel (2002), most of the qualitatively relevant core models focused on job attitudes as the main reason for leaving, and were based on March and Simon’s model (1958) that dissatisfaction ultimately influences employee turnover (Mobley, 1977). However, although job satisfaction (JS) is a key predictor of employee turnover (Mossholder, Settoon, & Henagan, 2005), Griffeth and colleagues (2000) sustained that the strength of the relationship between satisfaction and turnover was weak. Previously, Judge (1993) argued that the relationship between satisfaction and turnover could be mediated by one or more variables. Furthermore, Mathieu and Zajac (1990) sustained that the dominant view on voluntary turnover assumed that satisfaction influences commitment and that organizational commitment mediates the effect of satisfaction on turnover intention. In particular, Mathieu and Zajac (1990) argued that “the most common use of organizational commitment in causal models mediated the influences of personal characteristics and work experiences on employee turnover processes” (p. 188). According to Wagner’s meta-analysis (2007), all three components of commitment influenced turnover and were negatively correlated with both turnover intention and voluntary turnover. However, although the corr...
As I researched and viewed my topic, I realized that retention is broader then I thought. All along I thought retention was just about retaining employees but I found out the system to retain employees and it’s factors. I found the key elements that effect retention to be very interesting. I didn’t know that retention can be broken down into to 3 dimensions which are social,mental,and physical. The social consist of the contact with people, mental consist of work characteristics, and physical consist of working conditions and pay. These three elements show that retention can be broken down psychologically. Since the terms can be broken down psychologically, it allows an employee to look into retention more closely. I
Employee retention is a process in which the employees are encouraged to remain with the organization for the maximum period of time. Retention of human resource is beneficial for the organization as well as for the individual too. Materialistic era and utility theory are responsible for changing of jobs. Corporate are facing problems in employee retention. Hiring calibre people to the organization is the perpetual need of organizations, but retention also is equally important rather more important than hiring. There is no dearth of opportunities for talent and potential, there are many organizations which are looking for the employees of same sector, who are not satisfied with their existing workplace. High rate of employee turnover is a warning to the management that something is wrong in the policies of the organization. Socially and ethically it is justified for the organizations to intervene into the reasons of employee switchover and try to retain its employees because of several reasons.
...and promote retention. The key is to motivate and develop to avoid the risk for turnover.
...961; Dawson and Lingard 1982; Alvarez and Arias 2003). At the same time, there is some evidence that management affects labour turnover. Thus, Davis and Haltiwanger (1992) and Hamermesh, Hassink and Van Ours (1996) report on variability of turnover rates across firms within narrowly defined sectors of economy, and their persistency within a given firm, which implies that management practices in these firms affect labour turnover. Burgess, Lane and Stevens (2000: 480) have also argued that some managers will be better than others at choosing good matches, and dissolving bad ones – and might even thrive on high turnover. Other managers, and management practices, will need low turnover. It is possible, therefore, that confounding the impacts of turnover itself and management partly mediated through turnover obscures the true role of labour turnover infirm performance.
Employee satisfaction is undoubtedly the best predictor of employee retention. A job environment consisting of good working relationships usually fosters employee satisfaction. Employees feel motivated as they believe that the company is appreciating their service and commitment. Job satisfaction results in employee retention. Employee retention could be defined as the length of time employees stay with the organization.
673), retention management must be based on three types of turnover, voluntary, discharged, and downsizing. Not all businesses are freighted by turnovers, for some it is the way of life and cost is built into the budget. However, for others any type of high turnover can be detrimental for company profit, employee wage and benefits offered. First, let’s take a look at voluntary and involuntary turnover that affects retention. Voluntary turnovers are caused by many different reasons. Turnover may result from topics such as job dissatisfaction, job mismatching, knowing that job opportunities are plentiful. Two reasons that I will discuss more are micromanagement and employee loyalty. Like stated before in the introduction, when employees are dissatisfied, possibly due to being placed in an area that doesn’t fit with their skill set, one is more likely to seek new employment. Another part of turnover is discharging and downsizing. Discharge is just that, members being discharged due to discipline and job performance. While downsizing turnover is a result of business being overstaffed (Heneman III, Judge, Kammeyer-Mueller, 2015, pg. 675). There are also other reasons for voluntarily employee turnover, such as generation differences when it relates to employment. The current generations are more likely to see a job as one piece in their life puzzle rather than as the first, indispensable anchor piece without
Ramlall, Sunil. (2004). A review of employee motivation theories and their implications for employee retention within organizations. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 5(1/2), 52-63.
Bersin, J. (2013, August 16). Employee Retention Now a Big Issue: Why the Tide has Turned | LinkedIn. Retrieved March 20, 2014, from