Are We Naturally Good Analysis

547 Words2 Pages

Human nature is similar to time. It changes as we continue on in life. For example, in the story “Are We Naturally Good or Bad?,” it supports how humans are good. On the other hand, in “The Midas Touch,” it explains how we are greedy. Also, in the “Myth of Human Nature,” it shows how human nature can affect us as humans. To sum up, human nature can be adjusted in time, and we each have different takes on human nature.

Body 1: To begin with, human nature is naturally good as shown in the article, “Are We Naturally Good or Bad?” The reason being is scientists/experimenters tested on babies to see if they are good examples to prove that human nature is good. For instance, the text states, “More likely to reach for the helper.” This quote relates to how we predict that we naturally good because after the little show the babies wanted the good person over the evil. In addition, the article says, ‘’They prefer helping motivations over hindering ones,’’ this determines that babies are more reluctant to go with the evil toy. All in all, the varieties of testing babies is an excellent example that shows us how human nature is good, but it doesn’t prove that we are particularly
Body 2: In the story named ‘’The Midas Touch’’ it demonstrates how human nature is arrogant. The story interprets how human nature is …show more content…

One example is,’’ Humans are competitive.” The reason being is that we always want things to be done and win them for ourselves. Ever since the beginning of mankind we have been in many wars and competitions to receive the things we think we deserve. Also, “Humans are selfish.” This is pretty accurate because to this day we as humans are all about ourselves. However, it is not in a positive way. Of course, we can have some confidence in ourselves, but there is a difference between confidence and selfishness. This confirms how human nature can be narcissistic most of the

Open Document