Appeasement Dbq

480 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: The effect of the 2nd World War

Dictators used other’s ignorance to expand their empire. Rulers were becoming greedy and were willing to go to any lengths to get what they wanted. The aggression needed to be stopped before one person help complete power. The method of using appeasement wasn’t a strong enough tactic get rid of the issues. The world plunged into World War II because of agression from the Axis Powers and the most effective response to such aggression is collective security.
Germany continued to push buttons resulting in the world jumping into a World War. Nations desired to grow and gain more influence. Danger increased while others selfish dictators were trying to bloom. In The Treaty of Versailles an article stated that German troops were forbidden from entering …show more content…

It failed to produce the desired results, but rather added fuel to the fire. At the Munich Conference the Big Four discussed the demands for the territory of Czechoslovakia and ultimately gave into Hitler’s request. While many people like Neville Chamberlain argued that appeasement was the best option Winston Churchill viewed it as a consequential decision. Churchill stated that he, “thinks of all the opportunities to stop the growth of Nazi Power which have been thrown away.” No action was taken to establish the security of Czechoslovakia making the Nazi’s more powerful. Appeasement did not defer the hostility that the desire for expansion brought on, but made it escalate. When Ethiopia was invaded by the Italians the emperor, Haile Selassie, was denied assistance from the Leage of Nations. He warned them what would happened if the aggressors were not stopped and wrote, “It is us today. It will be you tomorrow.” Haile Selassie knew that aggressors were going to continue to seek for more land and that any nation could be attacked next. Not only was appeasement an effort to satisfy the demands of dissatisfied powers in hope of maintaining stability, but it was also the disregardance of possibly serious conflict. The League of Nations incapability to be a forceful united front allowed for the Axis Powers to become even more willing to break boundaries. Appeasement was used to be the path of least resistance, but it would never stop the

Show More
Related

  • Fascism in the 1920's and 1930's

    820 Words  | 2 Pages

    Germany and her allies were blamed for the war. The Treaty of Versailles said that they had to pay for the cost of the war. The Treaty of Versailles is what caused World War II. If it had been less harsh on Germany, the Weimar Republic would have been stronger and would not have faced as much economic and social turmoil. Had the treaty been harsher, Germany would not have had the power to make war.

    Read More

  • Rosie the Riveter

    1261 Words  | 3 Pages

    Germany was economically frail subsequent to World War I. The Treaty of Versailles had held them accountable for the cause, and the Great Depression further deteriorated their condition. Germany was ambitious for power and resources. Envisioning world domination, Adolf Hitler, dictator of Nazi Germany, led his Nazi Party to invade Poland in 1939. France and Britain guaranteed to offer military support if Poland were to become attacked; they declared war, initiating World War II.

    Read More

  • The Causes of World War II

    663 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Treaty of Versailles is a cause of World War II because of the restrictions it placed on Germany as the alleged sole aggressor of the war. The war reparation totaled $98 billion, and under Clause 231 Germany was forced to take the entire load onto her ruined economy and attempt to repay the debt starting with an initial $5 billion payment. In terms of military, Germany was limited to a 100,000 man army, with her navy stripped to the level of a coast guard, she was allowed no heavy artillery, no weapons of mass destruction and the border with France became a demilitarized zone for 15 years following the signing of the treaty on June 28 1919. Germany also lost all her territories in Africa and became a mandate of the Allied Forces, those living in mandated zones could participate in “self-determination” after the Allies taught them how to be a democracy (...

    Read More

  • Was the Treaty of Versailles the Major Cause of World War Two?

    1156 Words  | 3 Pages

    World War Two was the most devastating conflict in the history of humanity. It crippled many nations and caused millions of people to die. One of the major causes of this disastrous war was the Treaty of Versailles which ended the First World War. This treaty was destructive towards the Germans. Germany had to pay large amounts of reparations to the Allied nations at the end of World War One resulting in a Great Depression in Germany. Additionally, the Treaty of Versailles’ war guilt clause forced Germans to admit full responsibility for starting the war. Furthermore, to gain the support of the German populace, Adolf Hitler adopted an effective propaganda campaign. Adolf Hitler employed a successful propaganda campaign to gain the support of the German people combined with the Treaty of Versailles harsh economic and political sanctions ignited World War Two.

    Read More

  • Collective Security Dbq

    871 Words  | 2 Pages

    Yet during the time appeasement seemed to be logical, as stated in document 8 only the German people could take away Hitler’s power which is why the League tried to appease to Hitler. Also the League feared that if they defeated Germany, Russia would take over most of Europe in their absence. While those are good reasons to try to appease to Hitler, the League of Nations forgot one important detail, Germany wasn’t afraid of the League. Neville Chamberlain the prime minister of Britain was an avid supporter of appeasement, yet even he said he would fight Germany if they were trying to dominate the world by fear of its force according to document 5. What Chamberlain failed to notice was that is what Germany was trying to do.

    Read More

  • Appeasement

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ent had given European countries the initial act of being responsible and gave them the chance to win a war by building up their armies. Appeasing Hitler had shown their loyalty and understanding of how much Germany had lost in relation to the Treaty of Versailles, and how they deserved some of what was taken given back. In the end, World War II was lost to Germany and because of that; the world today is now at peace. Appeasement was truly the right thing to do and the freedom of today reflects that.

    Read More

  • Appeasement Dbq

    987 Words  | 2 Pages

    The view of appeasement has been debated amongst historians. Richard Overy agrees with the appropriateness of the foreign policy during 1936-1938 in terms of Britain’s economic conditions and interest. While, historian R.A.C Parker disputes the view that appeasement was the only policy to pursue where alternatives to appeasement should have been considered. In contrast Martin Gilbert holds a different view as he suggests that Chamberlain was right to adopt the policy of appeasement because it was the conventional and sensible option as the policy was continued by Chamberlain predecessors. In addition, Gilbert evokes a more balanced view, disputing that appeasement was unsuccessful during 1938 particularly with the Munich crisis .

    Read More

  • How Did The Versailles Treaty Help The World War II?

    1394 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Treaty of Versailles, initially created to keep peace in Europe and ensure that another war like World War I wouldn’t happen again, had in fact, backfired and spiraled the world down into a deeper, bloodier battle. The treaty discriminated strongly against Germany, with the loss of territories, military restrictions, economic reparations, and the War Guilt Clause. It caused humiliation and anger within Germany, and led to Hitler and the Nazi Party coming to power. World War II was not only started by Adolf Hitler and Germany, but had a lot to do with the humiliation that Germany felt when the terms for the Treaty of Versailles were laid down. The harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles may be indirectly related to the cause of World War II, but nonetheless was a huge factor in starting the war.

    Read More

  • Axis Powers Dbq

    1873 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Axis Powers, initially consisting of Germany and Italy, were the major aggressors in World War II. This pact later included Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Finland, Yugoslavia, Independent State of Croatia and Croatia, with Japan emerging as another major aggressor (Source 1). The alliance between Japan, Germany and Italy was known as the Tripartite Pact, also known as “the Axis alliance” (Source 1). In all, the Axis Powers killed millions and committed countless atrocities. What was their motivation? What did they desire? The answer is intriguing, and surprisingly subtle. All three countries had different motives, but it was their underlying distaste for current social order that brought

    Read More

  • Is Appeasement Right or Wrong?

    796 Words  | 2 Pages

    Germany benefited greatly from the appeasement as it allowed them to rearm. The sand is a sand. Britain and France thought that if they appeased Germany, then The Germans would become a little friendlier towards them so they cut the Germans a little slack. However, by appeasing Germany, they let. her rearm therefore pose a threat to themselves and others.

    Read More

  • Explain Why Did The World Plunged Into Ww2 Dbq

    1057 Words  | 3 Pages

    The world plunged into World War II in 1939, from the unsettlement between countries. Different countries had different ideas about world affairs. Some countries preferred appeasement and other countries preferred collective securities to solve problems such as the turmoil in Germany. According to the circumstances of Europe during 1939, from economic depression and unsettlement between countries, collective security was the best answer. Appeasement was attempted, but it turned out to be a failure.

    Read More

  • Appeasement Essay

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the First World War that led to death of millions of people, many countries decided to put measures to avoid any future conflict. The League of Nations in the 1920s came up with the idea of collective security where countries acting together would discourage aggression and act to stop the aggressor. This did not work out well as countries failed to agree on common policies. As a result, appeasement was considered. It was a policy that was adopted by the British government in the1930s. It was formulated from the belief that some countries such as Germany were unfairly treated in the Versailles treaty of 1918-1919. Adolf Hitler came into power in Germany on January 1933 after exploiting the depression-afflicted economy and the vehement popular resentment against Versailles treaty. The Nazi leader started by alarming the diplomats on his hatred towards the parliamentary system of governance and democratic government. The policy of appeasement had good intentions, but failed to put measures against aggression by the Germany government, which eventually led to World War 2.

    Read More

  • Keith Eubank Appeasement Essay

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    Keith Eubank’s Appeasement and Appeasers and Gerhard Weinberg’s Munch after 50 Years both describe the policy of appeasement as well as the general consequences of the policy. Essentially, the League of Nations had begun to crumble and individuals sought a new means to keep the peace. The basic idea of appeasement was to give Hitler what he wanted in order to dissuade him from declaring war. Collectively, Europe saw another war as a sort of unspeakable evil, one to be prevented at all costs. Therefore, the plan was to assume that once Hitler was negotiated with, he would stop the excessive aggression that people feared would inevitably lead to another world war.

    Read More

  • Appeasement Policy and the Munich Agreement

    5818 Words  | 12 Pages

    Meanwhile, Fuhrer Hitler and the Nazi party were continuing their domination of Europe and threatening to invade Czechoslovakia, which many felt would most likely incite another World War. To prevent this, England, France, Italy and Germany entered into an agreement, which would allow Germany to seize control of Sudetenland and is today known as the ‘Munich Pact’. Sudetenland had a large German population and its borders were in strategically strong areas for the German military. For negotiations to be successful there are many components that one must be aware of such as personalities of all parties, end goals of each person and the history of the country. England led the process with an appeasement policy as an attempt to mollify Hitler and the Nazi party and prevent war, which this pact did not.

    Read More

  • Was Appeasement The Right Policy?

    1346 Words  | 3 Pages

    The public had the idea that Europe was safe and peaceful, and there wouldn’t be war. Some people say that if the Allied Nations, such as the US got involved with the appeasement, then World War 2 might have been averted. Others say, it was Britain and France shouldn’t have given too much freedom since they more they gave to the country, the more they had demanded. Germany was allowed to make agreements with other countries, which they were not allowed to do according to the treaty. Italy and Germany had made a “Pact of Steel” which was an alliance made to protect and help each other during a time of War.

    Read More

More about Appeasement Dbq

Open Document