Andrew Jackson was like no other president before him. The previous presidents had one thing in common, they were all part of the founding fathers or in John Quincy Adam’s case was the son of a founding father. However Jackson was a plantation owner from the west who had no connections with the government. He also had different views from other presidents that made his presidency unique. Two things that separated Andrew Jackson’s presidency from previous presidencies were he reached out to the common people and he was disapproving of the Bank of United States.
Andrew Jackson: Should he be elected for a third term? Andrew Jackson has been a nuisance to me ever since his first term in office. Throughout the years, his administration has proved to be against everything that I have worked so hard to achieve. In the issue of the bank, he has abused his Executive power, given to him by the Federal Constitution. There are many instances of when Andrew Jackson has abused his executive power through his previous terms.
The election of Andrew Jackson as President of the United States changed the customary politics. President Jackson focused on the common man, which was unusual for a president to care more about the common man than the ongoing trend toward a greater voter participation. Jackson’s election was revolutionary because he met a different criteria for president rather than previous presidents, he increased the rules and overall power of the President, also given his popularity for focusing on the common man throughout his term his actions as President did little to nothing to aid the common man.
A famous writer once described a hero as a “...person really intent on making this a better place for all people.” Unfortunately, a hero isn’t what an individual could use to describe the seventh U.S. president, Andrew Jackson. Born into a hard knock life in March of 1767 on the border of North and South Carolina, Jackson grew to be the voice of the Common Man (Background Info). He lost the presidency in the election of 1824 after House of Representatives chose to elect president John Quincy Adams, but returned four years later, taking his spot in office. Jackson grew to become a successful Tennessee lawyer and politician by the year of 1812 (Background Info). However, early on in his life during the British invasion of the Carolinas (1780-1781),
Following the war of 1812, there was much growth, expansion, and social change occurring within America. This was especially true during the passing years of 1820s to 1830s. Andrew Jackson (old hickory) was a hero during this time, because he had succeeded in winning the battle of New Orleans, making him incredibly popular among the people. Andre Jackson decided to run for the office of President of the United States. Jackson believed himself to be a spokesman of the common man and thought that the government should be for, and ran by the farmers, and urban workers. His many followers, known as Jacksonian democrats, held this same opinion. Together, they felt themselves to be the guardians of the Constitution, political democracy, individual
Andrew Jackson DBQ Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States. During this time period, many major events occurred with such significance that he got his own era, The Era of Jackson. Some say that Jackson should be impeached while others disagree. Either way, there are many arguments supporting both claims, but I think Jackson should be impeached because of abusing his powers, killing the Cherokee Indians on the Trail of Tears, and for taking down the national bank. Jackson felt that the national bank only favored the poor and not the “common man” so he decided that he would destroy it.
Democracy has a principle of equality between social classes and between individuals. Andrew Jackson campaigned that he would change the system to help directly represent the people instead of the representative. He was a large proponent of democracy, in which he was well-known for. Andrew Jackson was democratic to a certain extent in which he enhanced the voice of the people and their contribution to the government. Although he put an emphasis on equality, his actions towards the Native Americans and the wealthy population says otherwise.
Andrew Jackson was the seventh president of America who had a very unique time in office. Jackson advertised as being for the people of the United States but then his actions proved otherwise at later times. While Jackson did things for the people, he was as much of an autocrat as he was a democrat based upon the documents that were formed during his time in office.
I think Andrew Jackson was an autocrat. He was biased about many of his claims regarding the people, and he only went into the election as a democrat, hoping to look good for them. This is known because in ‘National Bank Controversy: Document 2’, he was very bias. He wanted a new bank just because the rich class was taking up too much space in it, not even referencing the foreigners that had more than a fourth of the stock. Yes, he wanted to do it because the poor didn’t have enough space in it, but he also did it because he has something against rich people; he doesn’t like them because he grew up poor.
Many people have different views of Andrew Jackson. Even though the United States has a system that makes it nearly impossible for a tyrant to uprise, somehow Andrew Jackson found a way to become a tyrant through the system. When Jackson ran for president in 1824, the people deeply supported Jackson. Although he had “won” the election, he didn’t win by enough votes. The vote had to go to the House of Representatives who in the end chose John Quincy Adams to become president. Andrew Jackson was infuriated and wished that the House of Representatives was abolished. When he became president in 1828, he seemed humble and eager but secretly had a plan to abolish the system of government. Was Andrew Jackson a supporter of having social equality for all, or did he abuse his power for the betterment of himself ? Andrew Jackson because: he disregarded the constitution and congress, he supported unfair taxes, and he vetoed congress laws with no justification.