All Writs Act Argumentative Essay

822 Words2 Pages

The feud between Apple Company and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) started after the terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California on December 2015. The FBI named the man responsible for the Massacre as Syed Rizwan Farook along with his wife, Tashfeen Malik. The police killed the couple during the shootout and found an iPhone (Apple product) used by Farook which later the FBI learned was given to him by his employer from the government. In order to trace others involved in the killings, the FBI requested Apple to help them crack the phone because they don’t want to risk deleting the possible information they need. “Cracking the phone” is a process of making a backdoor or breaking into the secured computer system with certain software which enables illegal copying of data (techopedia). I thought it was absurd to know that during the House committee hearing on March 3, 2016, Apple dismissed the FBI request to crack the mobile phone used by Farook in the San Bernardino Massacre on December …show more content…

Apple argues that the “All Writs Act does not give the court the right to "conscript and commandeer" into defeating its own encryption” which might result in vulnerability of its information to hackers and thieves. Moreover, the act limits its usage to certain circumstances which should not be a burden to compliance. Also, it balances security and privacy measures for the common good of the people. According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an international non-profit digital right group, “the All Writs Act, while pretty broad, is not all-powerful”, thus, this company supports Apple’s stand. Since Apple is still arguing its case, Congressman Darrel Issa (R-CA) asked the FBI to try harder to crack the iPhone's encryption on their

Open Document