Privacy Vs Security Research Paper

Privacy Versus Security Thesis Statement: Although the intention of the FBI is the protection of U.S citizens against future domestic terrorist attacks, the pressuring of Apple to hack the iPhone goes against Apple’s constitutional rights, undermines the freedoms given to all U.S citizens, and leaves citizens vulnerable to attack from individuals or governments who abuse the technology. Apple owns the right to deny the FBI request because the First Amendment permits the right of freedom of speech. The computer code acts as the speech, therefore the First Amendment protects it. With this, Apple claims the government lacks fundamental evidence that the phone contains something substantial in relations to the case. As a result of the lack of evidence, it proves unconstitutional to write the code that would hack the iPhone. Plus, it would go against Apple’s public stance in favor of security. Thus, the government would be forcing Apple to code something they do not agree with, again, violating the First

According to the Supreme Court, the Fourth Amendment protects all modern technology. As a result, hacking the iPhone infringes on the Fourth Amendment against not necessary for Apple, but iPhone users. This tool poses as a threat to the millions of people who own an iPhone. Looking at the whole picture, the government basically demands Apple to intentionally weaken the security system in place to keep the privacy of anyone who owns an iPhone safe. No company should deliberately weaken what they spent years making to keep people’s privacy protected. If Apple builds this hacking system they put at risk the solid foundations of security they built up over the years to ensure security to all their customers in this digital age. Plus, leading to the next argument, people with ill-intent for the technology also threaten the privacy of iPhone