Albert Camus An Absurd Reasoning

1278 Words3 Pages

We use absurd as a way to describe someone or something that which we are unable to full comprehend. The discipline of philosophy uses “the Absurd” as a reference to the conflict between human nature—the tendency to seek inherent value and meaning in life, but not being able to find any. I am going to argue that Albert Camus is using the term “absurd hero” to describe someone who is fully aware of the suffering that comes with being human, and that overcoming personal suffering is what makes you a “hero”. In both An Absurd Reasoning and The Myth of Sisyphus, Camus revolves around the idea of being aware that humans face suffering, and any other belief would be an act of ignorance. He continuously returns to the idea that without our inner demons, there would be no way to provide life a meaning; as humans all we strive to do is apply a meaning to life, a concept with which we struggle to understand.
To introduce us to his beliefs, …show more content…

He has said that “ ….[I]n a man’s attachment to life there is something stronger than all the ills in the world. The body’s judgement is as good as the mind’s, and the body shrinks from annihilation…. (An Absurd Reasoning, Albert Camus, pg. 8). What he means in this passage, is that we find meaning in life, an attachment to living by neglecting the suffering in the world. Rather, we hide from things that can harm us physically, yet we acknowledge our mental suffering in hopes to overcome it. Camus, in my opinion, believes in the meaning of life being derived from overcoming personal issues. For him, the suffering of the world is pointless, and there is no reason for us to acknowledge it for it is beyond our control. Rather we should become like Sisyphus, the “absurd hero”, and acknowledge our own demons whilst living the roles with which we have been dealt. This situation is ideal, for we are in a situation where we have full

Open Document