Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 2001
Stress as a determinant of health
Effect of stress on health
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 2001
1. Ainslie, D. C. (2003). Principlism. In Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Vol. 5, 3rd edition, pp 2099-2104.
A philosophy professor highly engaged in bioethics research and publications, Ainslie drew up a short section on Principlism discussing the Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics – Respect for Autonomy, Nonmaleficence, Beneficence and Justice. It is worthy of mention that Ainslie analyses the application and clashes of principles in situations of ethical dilemma, and presents various criticism of Beauchamp’s and Childress’s inability to organise the principles systematically in times of clashes. In addition, this article proposes suggestions in resolving principle disagreements. My paper builds itself heavily on this source, for I would be
…show more content…
They recognise rights as “instruments… to guarantee that individuals cannot be sacrificed to government interests or mere majority interests”. They go on to discuss the conditional overriding of individual rights (e.g. due to national security), the circumstantial correlativity between rights and obligations, and the weakness of the Rights Theory in accounting for virtues and communal good. This source is extremely crucial in framing my arguments, for my paper would base itself on the Rights Theory when raising the ethical dilemmas between individual rights and crew safety, and between individual rights and obligations of the nation and/or companies. My paper would also contrast as well as harmonise the Rights Theory to the Principles of Biomedical Ethics in the abovementioned …show more content…
She discusses various physical and psychological stressors, the consequences on human health and work performance, as well as the current countermeasures to tackle the stress factors. Pertaining to my paper, I would focus on the psychological and psychosocial stressors and countermeasures. Morphew’s expertise in space psychology is backed with a Masters in Aerospace Human Factors & Engineering Psychology, making her analysis of the psychological stress factors credible. This source serves to guide my research paper, from understanding the various psychological stressors in long-duration spaceflights to working towards overcoming them with computerized therapy. Through knowing the methods currently implemented to face the psychological and psychosocial challenges, I can identify their strengths and shortcomings and use them to develop my research
The case of Marguerite M presents an ethical dilemma. Medical ethics play a special role in medicine and is directly concerned with its practice. Its role has continued to evolve as changes develop in
Principles of Biomedical Ethics, by Tom Beauchamp and James F. Childress, has for many critics in medical ethics exemplified the worse sins of "principlism." From its first edition, the authors have argued for the importance and usefulness of general principles for justifying ethical judgments about policies and cases in medical ethics. The organization of their book reflects this conviction, dividing discussion of particular ethical problems under the rubrics of the key ethical principles which the authors believe should govern our moral judgments: principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice.
Wilson , James G. S., “Rights”, Principles of Health Care Ethics, Second Edition, eds. R.E. Ashcroft, A. Dawson, H. Draper and J.R. McMillan. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2007. pp. 239.
Veatch, Robert M.,"The Normative Principles of Medical Ethics." In Medical ethics. 1997. Reprint, Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 1989 29-56.
My brother deserves to die. My grandmother should have died sooner than she did. My brother is autistic, cannot speak, and cannot even completely dress himself-he makes no visible contribution to society-therefore he should not be allowed to live. My grandmother had Alzheimer's disease, slipped into a coma after Valentine's Day, and was placed on a feeding tube until she finally passed on two days before my 16th birthday-but she should not have been allowed to waste my family's money and stay in the hospital for weeks. My family should have just let her die and get over with it.
When medical care providers are forced to make decisions and these decisions “violate one of the four principles of medical ethics” so that they can adhere to another of these principles this is considered an ethical dilemma (“Medical Ethics & the Rationing of Health Care: Introduction”, n.d., p. 1). Bioethicists refer to the healthcare ethics four principles in their merits evaluation and medical procedure difficulties as transplants. Organ and or transplant allocation policies has a mixture of legal, ethical, scientific and many others, however the focus here will be to show how the four ethical principles, autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence and justice, applies to transplant allocation (Childress, 2001, p. 5).
In this diverse society we are confronted everyday with so many ethical choices in provision of healthcare for individuals. It becomes very difficult to find a guideline that would include a border perspective which might include individual’s beliefs and preference across the world. Due to these controversies, the four principles in biomedical ethic which includes autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice help us understand and explain which medical practices are ethical and acceptable. These principles are not only used to protect the rights of a patient but also the physician from being violated.
Steinbock, Bonnie, Alex J. London, and John D. Arras. "Rule-Utilitarianism versus Act-Utilitarianism." Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine. Contemporary Readings in Bioethics. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2013. 12. Print.
In part VI of Ronald Munson’s Intervention and Reflection: Basic Issues in Bioethics, five main ethical theories are explored. The theories and their “truths,” along with their difficulties, will be challenged in accepting them as absolutes. An absolute is an immutable, universal truth about reality; but none of these theories as a whole hold up to be an absolute. They remain ethical theories, not ethical facts. (Absolutes, commandments, guidelines, inferences, and convictions)
Physician-assisted suicide refers to the physician acting indirectly in the death of the patient -- providing the means for death. The ethics of PAS is a continually debated topic. The range of arguments in support and opposition of PAS are vast. Justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for PAS. The distinction between killing and letting die, sanctity of life, "do no harm" principle of medicine, and the potential for abuse are some of the arguments in favor of making PAS illegal. However, self-determination, and ultimately respect for autonomy are relied on heavily as principle arguments in the PAS issue.
Ethics refers to the values and customs of a community at a particular point in time. At present, the term ethics is guided by the moral principles that guide our everyday actions. These moral principles guide the researcher into deciding what is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. The foundation of medical ethics is governed by two philosophical frameworks that are deontology, and utilitarianism. However ultimately the ethics committees need to balance the risks, and benefits for the participants and the community associated with the particular research proposal. This balance is quite important as the well being of participants is at risk.7
The case of Dr. Lowell and Mrs. Jackson revolves around a conflict between the doctor, who advocates the implementation of a particular treatment and the patient who disagrees with the doctor and wishes to do things her own way. The doctor feels that the suggested course of action is disastrous and threatens to have the patient declared mentally incompetent. The question now is whether or not the doctor is morally justified in taking action against the patient in order to implement the course of treatment she feels would be most effective. Is this an infringement on the autonomy of the patient or is the doctor morally obliged to do everything that he/she can possible do in order to restore the patient’s health even if that includes to go so far as to take this decision out of the hands of the patient?
Mayhew, Robert. The Journal of Ethics , Vol. 1, No. 4 (1997) , pp. 325-340
The article titled “Contemporary Ethical Analyses: A Shortfall in Scientific Knowledge” describes the ethics through the public’s eye. One of the major ethical issues brought up is informed consent.
... In: Thomasma D, Kushner T, Eds. From birth to death—science and bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.