How Did The Treaty Of Versailles Contribute To The Rise Of Fascism In Germany

1656 Words4 Pages

To what extent did the Treaty of Versailles contribute to the rise of Fascism in Germany?

The Treaty of Versailles officially ended the war between Germany and the Allies (England, France and the US) on 28th June 1919. While the delegates of the victorious countries should have been concerned with the prospects of future peace in Europe, they instead focused solely on making Germany as weak as possible. Graebner and Bennett (2011) argue that “the democratic powers at Versailles had the opportunity in 1919 to set an aggrieved Germany, one that scarcely resembled Hitler’s, on a different course.” They of course failed. The Treaty of Versailles was the main cause for the rise of Fascism in Germany after the war. Ashley Grimshaw (2008) claims
There were a number of heavy restrictions placed on Germany by the treaty; in particular the economic effects as a result of the reparations caused huge turmoil for the German people. John Maynard Keynes states “The reparations part of the Treaty of Versailles caused the collapse of currency and inflation in Germany and with these two events the German people’s savings were wiped out.” (Keynes, 1995, p. 73) The effects were further exacerbated by the Depression of the 1930s during which there was huge “unemployment, poverty and famine.” (Mayer, 1967, p.766) Consequently, the German people became tired of their weakness and suffering and began to strive towards power. The failure of the Weimar Republic to address the Treaty of Versailles became the main cause for the problems they were experiencing. “Many Germans, especially German nationalists, went as far as referring to the acceptance of the treaty as treasonous.” (Grunberger, 1964, p.59) Thus, Hitler offered promises that the current government failed to amend which were extremely appealing to the German people, stating “The German people liked Hitler’s Four Year Plan that called for slum clearance, housing programs, land reclamation, and construction of roads many problems that had been created by the Treaty of Versailles.”
Richard Evans (2003) argues “The triumph of Hitler was by no means inevitable in 1918…” With the legacy of the German past seeming to follow a particular path there were however many twists and turns between the defeat of Germany in 1918 and the rise of the Third Reich in 1933. It is difficult to support the argument that capitalism brought Hitler to power; by taking advantage of the economic crisis in German he forced the German people to choose between the Communist alternative and what appeared to be a traditionalist political movement. In fact during 1932-33 support for the Nazi Party had reduced and this was at a time of slight economic recovery, this suggests that support rested on how the German economy was recovering after the times of severe economic upheaval. Therefore the Nazi seizure of power in January 1933 was a contingent event and not

Open Document