Different Concepts Of John Piaget, John Erikson, And Lawrence Kohlberg

1390 Words3 Pages

Developmental psychology is a subfield of psychology that is responsible for studying the development of human beings from the moment they are born till their death. That is, this branch is focusing on assessing and getting to understand why and how a person changes physically, mentally (has to do with their cognition), and socially over their lifetime. As a result of these studies, many psychologists have come out with various concepts and ideas that divide the life span of a person into multiple stages. Three of these scientists were John Piaget, Erik Erikson, and Lawrence Kohlberg. Using the concepts presented by each of these developmental psychologists and the different stages of human life which varies in the eyes of each of them, I am …show more content…

John Piaget believed that most of our development occurs during our childhood and up to the age 12. In other words, he mostly focused on the cognitive development of human intelligence and he believed that this development takes place in stages. That is, human beings jump from each level of thinking at one stage to the next stage of higher level of thinking. According to Piaget, there are four stages that they mostly occur from our birth until when we are twelve years old. These stages are: sensorimotor stage (birth to 2 years), preoperational stage (two to seven years), concrete operational stage (7 to 12 years), and formal operational stage (12 years and so forth). Based on Piaget’s classification, my cousin is at his last stage of cognitive development, formal operational stage. Piaget states that at this stage, the adolescent will have developed a decent level analytical thinking and he will be able to make hypothesis and test them accordingly. Also, they will be able to make abstract deductions based on their logical thinking. Looking at Saied, we can see that he behaves the same way that Piaget’s theory suggests. He uses his own logic and begins making inferences that School is pointless and that he needs to enter the workforce right away. He believes in his deductions so firmly that he would not listen to anyone else’s suggestions. Thus, he acts in accordance to his analysis and drops out of …show more content…

According to Piaget’s theory he would probably be in his concrete operational stage. In this stage he would definitely start questioning things around him; however, he would not have the ability to test any hypothesis and make any logical deductions on his own, so he would stay at school. Based on Erikson’s theory, Saied would be in the industry vs inferiority stage. During this stage the adolescent is learning how to blend in the society while taking care of his own tasks, little by little. If he succeeds in coping with these challenges then he would move on to the next stage successfully, but if he fails then he would feel inferior. However, he has not the capability to make such big decisions on his own, yet. Kohlberg would categorize Saied at the beginning of his conventional stage. At the age of 11 in that stage, Saied would be making his decisions about his moral dilemmas based on the laws and rules of the society. Since, it is not common at all and may be even against the rules for an eleven year old to quit school, despite the challenge he is facing, Saied would have to continue his

Open Document