A few days ago on June 23, 2016, there was something globally announced that is being called Brexit, which means Britain 's exit. In other words, the United Kingdoms has decided to split apart from the European Union. To many people, they see this a bad thing and are against it. However, this is not a bad decision for Britain and it will them good. As a matter of fact, the United Kingdoms has many reasons to leave, such as the voting percentage from the citizens, the allowing of immigrants, insane rules, money, etc. The decisions will be the absolute best decision that could be made for the citizens. First of all, when it comes to percentages on how many citizens in the UK thought it was a good idea for Brexit the numbers are very close. …show more content…
This is a major problem and a reason for the UK to leave because all the immigrants coming in and taking away all the jobs and not allowing original citizens to work or find jobs. In addition, "Total freedom of travel into a welfare state is a problem. Freedom of travel by unvented Muslim refugees is even more of a problem"(Ben Sharpio). This quote is showing that keeping refugees would be a bad idea and that people should not travel to a country with such Welfare. The UK however did not like this idea that immigrants are allowed and that they want to get rid of them. Aside from immigrants, the UK is also having to deal with financial problems. As contribution to the EU, everyone in the country has to pay about $300 per person. And this bothers the UK. "While much of this money is spent on services in the UK, Brexit supporters still argue that it would be better for the UK to simply keep the money and have Parliament decide how to spend it"(Timothy B. Lee)" . If the Brexit were to happen in the next two years, we will see the UK in a very civilized way by using money for themselves and their citizens as well as keeping illegal immigrants
In addition, in a referendum in 2011, the UK electorate voted against changing this method, proving that its use reflects the will of the people, and is therefore not a cause of a deficit in UK
There were substantial amount of people who despised the actions undertaken by the British government
To better understand Brexit, one must know about the European Union (EU). The EU began following World War II with a purpose to create economic agreements amongst the countries of Europe. The belief behind the establishment of the EU is that countries whom trade with one another are less likely to go to war. Since its establishment, the EU has grown in number of member states and in the amount of power the governing bodies of the EU possess. In 1992, the EU became a single market as if it is one country. All new members of the EU must adopt the EU’s currency, the euro, in which 19 of the 28 countries have adopted. As a single market the EU parliament sets laws in many areas: environment, transport, consumer rights, etc. The single market allows
Others argued the opposite, in a letter to The Times Royal Society fellows commented that Brexit would be a “disaster for UK science”. The main reasons being: “increased funding has greatly raised the level of European science as a whole and of the UK in particular” and “we now recruit many of our best researchers from continental Europe, including younger ones who have obtained EU grants and have chosen to move here with them.”
In addition to that, job issue is also a significant problem. Although controlling immigration will create more job opportunities for local English people, leaving UK will also result in losing over three million job opportunities in general. Behind these figures, it means not only British people will not gain more jobs, but also
Many people in the UK coupled with media stories, tend to portray asylum seekers as bogus individuals who are here purely for economic gains (Teater 2014). This has led organisations such as Refugee councils and Refugee Action
On the other hand, UK is playing a major role in the single market. Thus, by leaving this market, UK
Bohuslav Sobotka, the Czech prime minister, said the following in a recent interview as a warning ‘immigrants may bring about the collapse of the EU.’ Refugees are intruders and impose burdens onto other countries. Refugees will take jobs and resources from struggling
To sum up, the statistics speak for themselves and the Britain’s fear of becoming an Islamic state is definitely not far-fetched. There is no doubt that the number of the Muslims
Burnett,J and Whyte,D. (2011) The Wages of Fear: Risk, Safety and Undocumented Work, Leeds and Liverpool, Positive Action for Refugees and Asylum Seekers (PAFRAS) University of Leeds and the University of Liverpool
On the one hand, without international relations from the EU, Britain is economically and socially vulnerable. While Britain’s exit from the EU may define Britain’s power according to British citizens, the type of power that matters is relative power, which is the power when it is being compared to other states. If the other states do not recognize Britain as a force of power, then its exit from the EU is pointless. On the other hand, by discontinuing the benefits granted by the EU, Britain declines the assistance that could have helped the country to become more powerful. In other words, Brexit decreases a source of gathering power for Britain, since the EU not only offers economic opportunities, but it also provides useful information so that the member states can behave accordingly. Overall, realism suggests that while Brexit increases Britain’s confidence in being powerful, it also decreases the country’s power in a way.
Various studies have scrutinised the overall impact of Brexit including the implications for jobs prospect, the effects on the public finances , its influence on the UK and also the possible risk it imposes on global economy. In conjunction with that, a plethora of analyses have also been attempted to quantify the economic impact Brexit primarily have on the UK , its region and also the rest the world. UK’s departure from the European Union , informally known as Brexit , bears an unswerving capacity to cut across the broad prism of economic constructs in both regional and global levels despite the wider claims that mentioned it is a risky step toward regional destabilization as EU loses its second largest
The main arguments to leave are to control immigration, reject the excessive bureaucracy (and associated cost) of Brussels and to lower prices for goods and services in the United Kingdom. I will focus on the economic argument to leave: leaving the European Union will save money by lowering prices and abstaining from "membership fees."
It is clear that talks about Brexit will not end quickly, and most important question is, what will happen in future. Well it could be claimed that is three different endings how this situation could end. Firstly one of the scenario is that Brexit happened and the U.K. completely leaves EU. In that case firstly British currency, the pound sterling, will fall down even more, than in the start after referendum. Also it will have consequences not only in Britain but also in the hole world, for example , some other countries, will see how Britain left European Union, and they will also will spoke to leave EU. So British leaving EU will have wide ranging repercussions on the other countries who look into EU skeptically also it will help Euro-skeptic
“The British have nothing bad to say about immigrants, but nothing good to say about immigration.” With a recent influx of immigrants in London, the debate regarding migrants and multiculturalism has become increasingly salient. White governance is becoming an antiquated notion as more and more Londoners are of mixed heritage. Like many other countries around the world, London still suffers from racial, ethnic, religious, lingual, and other forms of discrimination, generating social dissatisfaction and turmoil. More than half of London has a negative attitude towards immigration, yet many of those same people find it difficult to reject those fleeting a hostile home country or migrants who have relocated just to provide for their family. This societal and political tension will be further explored in this