Economic And Political Arguments For Regional Economic Integration
opinionated Essay
1017 words
What are the economic and political arguments for regional economic integration?
Intro — Overview of main economic integrated groups (the acronyms) and the five levels according to Hill. Using Brexit as an example.
1) free trade area (reduce tarriffs and import quotas)
Example. NAFTA. Allows specialization.
2) customs union (same import duties)
Allows not necessarily free trade
3) common market (european economic area)
You can work elsewhere, not just
4) economic union (common market with customs union)
5) political union (state composed or created from smaller states)
Political
A good case study surrounding regional economic integration can be found in the trucking industries of the US and Mexico during the establishment of the North
…show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Explains the economic and political arguments for regional economic integration.
- Analyzes how the us and mexico argued that the north american free trade agreement would allow each individual economy to specialize on what it is most efficient at, creating synergy between the two nations.
- Opines that the truckers were citing american safety as a reason against creating economic synergy between the two nations.
- Explains that regional economic integration refers to agreements among countries in a geographic region to reduce, and ultimately remove, tariff and nontariff barriers to the free flow of goods, services and factors of production.
- Explains that the political case for regional economic integration stems from national security and the european union.
- Explains that there are multiple levels of regional economic integration, such as the free trade area, customs union, common market, economic union and political union.
- Opines that in a perfect world, there would be absolute regional economic integration which would allow each country to become quite specialized and, therefore, quite efficient.
- Explains that brexit is an effort to reverse regional economic integration. the united kingdom was a member of the european union.
- Argues that leaving the european union will save money by lowering prices and abstaining from "membership fees."
- Explains that london generates as much tax revenue as the next 37 largest cities in the united kingdom. london is the leading international finance center due to its access to the european union.
- Explains why leaving the european union would put the united kingdom in a bad way financially.
- Opines that any anti-immigration argument for leave is rooted in nationalist sentiment based on fear and insecurity, not in quantitative economic policy.
- Opines that a true brexit would be disastrous for the united kingdom's economy, as london is the largest global financial center.
This is an excellent example of a political argument against economic integration and an economic argument for regional economic integration. According to Hill, regional economic integration refers to "agreements among countries in a geographic region to reduce, and ultimately remove, tariff and nontariff barriers to the free flow of goods, services, and factors of production between each other." The prevailing economic argument for regional economic integration is that it creates economic synergy by allowing each country to focus only on what it is most efficient at producing. Much of the political case for regional economic integration stems from national security. Another case study provided by Hill is the European Union. The nation states of Western Europe bonded together in an effort to deal with the political giants of the USSR to the east and the USA to the west. Further, regional economic integration can facilitate political harmony between nations due to their increased level of …show more content…
The United Kingdom was a member of the European Union. The European Union is an example of the second most integrated arrangement, the economic union. Therefore, voting to leave is a direct effort to reverse regional economic integration. The main arguments to leave are to control immigration, reject the excessive bureaucracy (and associated cost) of Brussels and to lower prices for goods and services in the United Kingdom. I will focus on the economic argument to leave: leaving the European Union will save money by lowering prices and abstaining from "membership fees." According to the British think tank Z/Yen, London is the top-ranked center for global finance. According to another think tank, the Centre for Cities, London generates as much tax revenue as the next 37 largest cities in the United Kingdom. The tax alone on financial services in London is immense. The European Union combined has the highest GDP in the world (above that of the United States) (GDP SOURCE). One of the principal reasons for which London is the leading international finance center is its access to the European Union, the world 's largest economy. Obviously, the United Kingdom being a member of the European Union is enormously helpful to ease the operations of the incredible amount of financial services that happens between London and the European
Related
- explanatory
- analytical
- opinionated
- Benefits Of Uk Membership For The European Union Outweigh The Costsexplanatory essayEconomic integration is the joining of economic policies between different states/regions. This eliminates tariff and non-tariff barriers to the flow of goods, services and factors of production between the regions. Economic integration has varying levels referred to as trading blocs; these are a form economic integration. A trading bloc is a group of nations that have been made a bilateral or multilateral agreement. There are four types of trading blocs. The least advanced level is the Free Trade Area. The features of this level is that reduced tariff barriers between signatories, which at times are abandoned altogether and there is free movement of labour and capital and the non-member countries have an independent set of tariffs against member countries. The second level of economic integration is the Customs Union. This is a Free Trade Agreement plus a common external tariff. Member countries agree to reduce tariff barriers among themselves and they have in common, this is referred to as tax harmonisation. The Common Market is the third level of trade blocs. This has features of the Customs Union plus free movement of capital and labour and some policy harmonisation such as similar trade policies to prevent certain member countries having an unfair advantage. The European Union is an example of a Common Market and is an economic and political partnership that involves 28 European countries. It allows goods and people to be moved around and has its own currency, the euro, which is used by nineteen of the member countries (The UK excluded). It also has its own parliament and sets rules in a wide range of areas such as transport,...
In this essay, the author
- Explains the benefits of uk membership in the european union outweigh the costs. economic integration is the joining of economic policies between different states/regions.
- Explains that uk membership in the eu has enforced trade barriers and removed a non-tariff barrier which has helped in reducing costs and prices for consumers.
- Explains that the eu has boosted uk goods trade by 55% compared to what was expected if the size of proximity of the individual economies was taken into consideration.
- Explains that the uk is the fourth largest net contributor within the eu and has had this position since it joined.
- Describes the benefits of the uk being in the eu, such as free movement of capital and labour.
- Explains that the net migrations have caused overcrowding in the uk. there is an increase in demand for housing and congestion on the roads.
- Explains that the uk's membership in the eu benefits uk consumers and increases household income. the cbi estimates the benefits of eu membership to be around £62-78 billion per year.
- Explains that the eu sometimes had inefficient economic policies, such as the common agricultural policy (cap).
- Explains that prices got higher for consumers and this encouraged the issue of surplus in the economy. it also put a high tariff on required imports.
- Explains that farming is inefficient as so much is given to so few. farmers represent only 3% of the eu's population and generate 6% of gdp.
- Concludes that the benefits of the uk's membership in the eu outweigh the costs. the most significant benefit is the access to the single market.
1531 wordsRead More - Should Britain Join The Single Currency?analytical essayThe debate has waged for several years now, ever since news of a single European Economic Union came first surfaced nearly fifteen years ago. The idea was simple, and focused on allowing multi-national European countries greater ease, and cost effective benefits when trading between countries. In a sense, the EEC was trying to implement an economic model similar to that of the United States, where amongst all fifty of the states there existed a single currency under a central federal bank that controlled the national interest rate level and other currency issues. Thus trade between the states was eased, promoting companies both with nation-wide interests, and those wishing to build from regional to nation wide platforms. However, since the official launch of the “Euro” in January of 1999, Britain, along with Sweden and the Dutch population, have chosen to remain isolated from this conglomerate, creating what many term a “two-speed” European economy. But why does the Britain business sector choose to remain isolated from this currency? This essay will attempt to examine both the positive and negative aspects of joining the single currency, while analyzing the forces behind Britain’s involvement.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the positive and negative aspects of joining the single currency, while analyzing the forces behind britain's involvement.
- Explains the benefits of a single currency for britain's business sector. exports to other countries within the euro zone don't have to bear the costs of exchanging profits into their home currency.
- Explains that one currency across europe increases the urge for companies to do business across the continent.
- Argues that the importance of joining a single currency to britain's business sector is startling. the u.k. market is quite small, and the majority focus on targeting the entire european market base.
622 wordsRead More - The North American Free Trade Agreementanalytical essayReciprocation also emerged as another disadvantage as the NAFTA agreement would have permitted unlimited access for U.S trucks throughout Mexico. This was made in comparison to the other regions in which the agreement worked perfectly. However, the challenge with the U.S Mexico agreement was that the U.S had violated their end of the bargain by using bigger and heavier trucks against the restrictions imposed by the Mexican Government. In addition to this, NAFTA had expanded the program of Maquiladora where companies owned by the United States hired Mexicans near the border to assemble products at low wages in order to be exported to the United States. This boosted their workforce although they did not have any labor rights and health protections (Hymson et, al. 230).
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement (nafta) was made in 1994 between the united states, canada, and mexico.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement had various economic developments that were characterized into various stages. nafta prides itself as the second largest free trade zone that brings together 364 million consumers in canada, mexico and the united states within an open market.
- Explains that nafta was built based on the 1989 free trade agreement between the united states and canada.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement was formed through the signing of leaders from the three countries, including brian mulroney, carlos salinas de gortari, and george h.w. bush.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement was the most environmentally conscious trade agreement ever negotiated. the supplementary agreement formulated a commission on environmental cooperation (cec).
- Explains that nafta aimed at formally expanding its operations to include countries such as chile in the year 1995, but the administration that ran under the tenure of clinton was unable to conclude these negotiations. president george w. bush came to the rescue by declaring a free trade area of the americas.
- Analyzes the controversies that emerged over the issue of the north american free trade agreement. some supporters claimed that the accord had stimulated democratic reforms in opening markets in mexico.
- Opines that most of the 20 million jobs generated in the united states between 1993 and 2000 could be attributed to the free trade bloc created by the agreement.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement brought significant foreign investment and contributed to a 24% increase in the per capita income of mexico.
- Analyzes the impact of nafta on the united states and mexican jobs, stating that 1.3 million farm jobs have been lost since 1993.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement has generated very few new jobs in mexico and might only be credited for a very small net gain in jobs.
- Analyzes the advantages and disadvantages associated with the north american free trade agreement. the agreement created the world's largest free trade area, allowing over 450 million people to export to each other at lower prices.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement has impacted the states in that it has increased trade in all goods and services.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement improved the exports obtained from the farms in the united states. exports to canada and mexico increased from 27% to about 30% in 2007.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement brought about the increase in farm exports after it had successfully eliminated the high mexican tariffs.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement brought about excessive trade in services. it boosted the service exports in the united states to canada and mexico from $ 25billion in 1993 to about $106.8 billion
- Explains that the united states imported about $116.2 billion in oil from mexico and canada in the form of shale oil. nafta eradicates tariffs, making the prices incurred for oil lower.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement helped in stepping up foreign direct investment through the increase of foreign direct investment from the united states in canada and mexico.
- Opines that the advantages in this sector might be felt through the three nations getting into an international corporation and boost business within countries that had cheap workforce and costs to produce their items.
- Opines that nafta had negative effects or rather had some shortcomings in their objectives. it made it a reality for many u.s manufacturers to move their jobs to lower-cost mexico.
- Compares the effects of nafta on the united states and mexico, stating that many jobs were lost due to labor being cheaper in mexico.
- Analyzes how the disadvantages of the north american free trade agreement were felt in the suppression of wages.
- Explains how the north american free trade agreement affected farmers and rural farmers in mexico. mexico reduced its subsidies to farmers from 33.2% of the total farm income in 1990 to 13.2% in 2001.
- Explains that the environment of mexico continued deteriorating due to the pressures of competition. nafta brought about free access for mexican trucks.
- Explains that the organization of truckers in the united states declined that part of the north american free trade agreement. they claimed that they would have lost their jobs.
- Explains that the nafta agreement would have allowed unlimited access for u.s trucks throughout mexico. however, the challenge with the us mexico agreement was that they violated their end of the bargain by using bigger and heavier trucks against the restrictions imposed by the mexican government.
2543 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Brexit Referendumanalytical essayThey include the following: the eventual abolition of the EU’s visa-free policy; “the creation of trade agreements; globalization, and the possible division of the United Kingdom for good”.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the world was shocked to learn of britain's desire to leave the european union. immigration was the dominant issue because the british felt economically and culturally threatened by increased levels of immigration.
- Argues that the prospect of higher wages in britain is attractive for lots of immigrants. opponents against brexit argue that reduced immigration lowers the standard way of life for native britons.
- Explains that the brexit referendum was a vote held in britain on june 23rd 2016 in all countries that comprised great britain.
- Argues that immigration was the overarching issue during the brexit referendum campaign for a couple of reasons.
- Concludes that there were insufficient considerations for the cultural and social context of the british people when the referendum was held.
1127 wordsRead More - The United Kingdom & Ireland: A Comparison of Healthcare Systemsexplanatory essayA composition of four constituent countries, England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, the United Kingdom (UK) is a sovereign country that is commonly referred to as Great Britain (or Britain) (Johnson & Stoskopf, 2010, p. 85). Located at the northwest corner of Europe, the United Kingdom has experienced one of the most prosperous periods of sustained growth in all of Europe, exhibiting a relatively steady rise in maturity and enterprise development for over 150 years (Johnson & Stoskopf, 2010, p. 87). This is a reversal of a trend seen in the first half of the 20th century where according to the CIA World Fact Book, the United Kingdom’s role as a world power was seriously depleted between two world wars, followed by the Irish withdrawal from the union. The second half of the century watched the slow dismantling of the British Empire and the United Kingdom rebuilding itself into a modern and prosperous European nation (Johnson & Stoskopf, 2010, p. 85).
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the united kingdom and ireland have universal healthcare systems, but the irish healthcare system is different from the uk's national health service.
- Explains that the united kingdom (uk) is a sovereign country that is commonly referred to as great britain (or britain).
- Explains that britain is one of the only countries that has no common set of governing documents, i.e. declaration of independence, bill of rights, constitution. governmental roots can be traced back to the magna carta of 1215 which outlined and protected certain individual rights.
- Explains that the united kingdom is a constitutional monarchy that is divided into 96 political counties and has the fifth largest economy in the world.
- Explains ireland's rise as an economic force on the european scene. its independence from britain was secured by a contested treaty in 1922.
- Describes ireland as a parliamentary democracy with two houses, the oireachtas (national parliament) and seanad éireann (the senate).
- Explains that before the establishment of the national health service, medical services were distributed via a system that structurally is very similar to the current system.
- Explains that the irish healthcare system originated in response to the poor and underprivileged. the british institutionalized and politicized healthcare through disciplinary work-house systems.
- Explains that the modern irish healthcare system began in 1947 with the publication of "an outline of proposals for the improvement of health services".
- Explains that the health act of 1953 was one of the first steps in a line of significant changes. it provided funding for voluntary (nonprofit) and community organizations for health and related services.
- Explains that funding for the national health service of the united kingdom is a mixture of public and private sources.
- Explains how a new general medical service contract changed the way general practitioners were paid and the services they were expected to provide.
- Explains that the british government believes an increase in taxes is one of the only sustainable mechanisms for maintaining the system.
- Explains that seventy percent of funding for the irish healthcare system is generated through public funds, while the remaining 30% is collected from private insurance and user fees.
- Explains that british citizens' access to free universal healthcare has allowed the country to achieve a human poverty index ranking of 15. life expectancy has increased by 2 years and infant mortality has decreased by 80%.
- Explains that the irish healthcare system is monitored by the health information and quality authority. a 2006 health service executive survey showed that irish citizens are happy with the quality of care they receive.
- Argues that the united states could benefit greatly from the establishment of a national institute of health and clinical excellence-like organization.
- Argues that the food and drug administration does not have the power to prevent a drug from making it to market if it is found to be ineffective in relation to cost.
2739 wordsRead More - Turkey's Relationship With the European Unionopinionated essayThe association between the two entities is a direct determinant of the increasingly relevant concept of regionalism wherein mutual interests drive political and economic alignments amongst states characterized by integration into regions. Regionalism has become increasingly popular as states have realized that their interests are more closely bound up with contiguous states, that their interactions are more frequent with closer neighbors, and that regional coordination is an effective method of protecting their interests and promoting milieu goals at the global level. However, the boundaries of these regions, and their criteria for membership and exclusion, seldom occur naturally and obviously. The patterns of congruence, complementarity and connection between states tend to overlap, complicating the task of defining a regional configuration in which members' interactions are more intense and interests more convergent than between members and non-members. Emphasis on different communities of interests or patterns of interaction will produce different regional configurations. So the membership of the region is determined by its defining criteria, or those communit...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the relationship between turkey and the european union (eu) represents a wide spectrum of concerns and motives relevant to both and carves the path for dense political and economic transformations in both political entities.
- Explains the concept of regionalism, wherein mutual interests drive political and economic alignments amongst states characterized by integration into regions.
- Explains that the eu expansionist policy provides exclusionary and stringent criterions for inclusion into its political community, based on the principles of consolidation of commitments, fair and rigorous conditionality, and good communication with the public.
- Explains that the enlargement policy allows for a carefully managed process where candidates and potential candidates approach the eu in line with the pace of their political and economic reforms as well as their capacity to assume the obligations of membership.
- Explains that turkey views europe as a region promoting and guaranteeing its prosperity. the eu has become more important to the overall economy.
- Opines that turkey's strategic position for western european concerns prevents the eu from categorically rejecting turkish claims to membership.
- Opines that the membership goal is critical to the turkish perception of eu sincerity. it was enshrined in the 1963 ankara agreement.
- Opines that nato's integrated military command has not brought turkey closer to its ultimate goal of membership of the eu.
- Explains turkey's membership criteria for the eu outlined as the copenhagen criteria constitutes four requirements representing economic, political, and cultural concerns. turkey is legally a european state.
- Opines that the eu is concerned about the human rights situation in turkey, since the customs union entered into force in 1996, and encourages the turkish government to meet its reform goals.
- Explains the importance of a strong market economy, which is measured by its capacity to withstand competitive pressure and market forces within the union.
- Explains that the eu requires turkey to settle disputes directly related to other member states and put criterions to meet the goal of formation of various unions and adoption and application of the acquis.
- Analyzes how cultural commonalities are promoted as the defining criteria of european regionalism by those with vision of a global role for the eu.
- Argues that turkey's exclusion from the eu is primarily on the basis of cultural regionalism, which is not explicitly admitted because of postcolonial, post-nazi sensitivities.
- Analyzes how turkey's self-conscious push for legal, political, and social reforms is deliberately aimed at european opinion and implicitly recognizes the cultural basis of european regionalism.
- Explains yesilada, birol, turkey's candidacy for eu membership, middle east journal, vol. 56, no. 1.
- Describes wesley, michael, and the pacific review's definitions of regionalism.
- Describes the commission's communication to the european parliament: enlargement strategy and main challenges 2009-2010.
- States that the commission of the european communities, regular report: turkey 1999, annex 1.
2315 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of Brexitanalytical essayInternational relations can be viewed under realism or liberalism. Since Brexit relates to international relations among European countries, it can be analyzed using either realism or liberalism. To clarify, Brexit is a short name for “British exit,” which was a reference to the public vote of Britain’s citizens to exit the European Union. In short, European Union is an international organization forming an environment for the European member states solve internal or external political or environmental issues, increase job availability, and create other economic opportunities.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that international relations can be viewed under realism or liberalism. brexit is a short name for "british exit," which refers to the public vote of britain's citizens to exit the eu.
- Compares the viewpoints of realism and liberalism regarding brexit. realism claims that a state's ultimate goal is power, while liberalism argues that brexit negatively affects britain’s economy due to inability to receive assistance from other member states.
- Analyzes how realism promotes britain's ability to be independent. it allows britain to define its immigration regulations, choose its own economic policies, and declare confidence in its global ranking.
- Opines that realism has some limitations regarding brexit. without international relations from the eu, britain is economically and socially vulnerable.
- Argues that liberalism believes in the efficiency of the international organizations or the eu, but brexit allows britain to regain its sovereignty because joining an international system reduces a state’s sovereignty due to regimes.
- Opines that brexit under liberalism has many weaknesses that britain will have to encounter.
- Concludes that realism provides an explanation for britain's exit from the eu, while liberalism suggests the challenges that the country will confront.
886 wordsRead More - The Impact Of Globalization Influence The Success Of Brexitanalytical essayBy being a member of the European Union, the UK was participating in globalization, but a slight majority of people did not find this participation to be beneficial. Those who were dissatisfied with being in the European Union felt that the UK did not gain anything from being in the EU, it was not an economically interdependent relationship, rather they felt that other countries were dependent on them. Furthermore, Leave campaigners did not like the influx of immigrants into the UK that is a result of the EU’s single market that allows people to freely move between countries. The United Kingdom joined the European Union in 1973, expanding into the world and in 2016 they left, showing that this form of globalization was not for
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how mauro f. guillén defines globalization as a process leading to greater interdependence and mutual awareness among economic, political, and social units in the world.
- Explains that the european union has a focus on both economics as well as human rights and many other topics. leave campaigners have found problems with essential parts of the eu such as its single market.
- Explains why leave campaigners believed exiting the eu would be best for the uk. the eu's single market allowed for easy movement of people across borders, leading to xenophobia and nationalist sentiments.
- Analyzes how the leave campaign latched onto immigration as a negative thing and ran with it.
- Analyzes how globalization influenced the success of brexit because the european union itself is the product of globalisation. leave campaigners did not like the influx of immigrants into the uk.
1162 wordsRead More - Regional Analysis: North American Free Trade Agreementanalytical essayMoreno-Brid, J. C. (2007). Economic development and industrial performance in mexico post-nafta. Retrieved January 25, 2008 from http://www.eclac.cl/celade/noticias/paginas/3/28353/JCMoreno.pdf
In this essay, the author
- Argues that regional integration will lead to the relocation of economic activity causing industries to increase in some countries and decrease in others.
- Analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of regional integration and the regional economic development of these nations as members of nafta.
- Argues that regional integration can improve the economic development of countries within the region.
- Cites hill, c.w.l, moreno-brid, j.c., and tomasetti, h.
1492 wordsRead More - The Benefits Of The European Single Marketanalytical essayOn the other hand, UK is playing a major role in the single market. Thus, by leaving this market, UK
In this essay, the author
- Describes the benefits of the european single market, stating that it encourages competition and trade, increases efficiency, promotes quality, and helps cut prices.
- Opines that the uk is playing a major role in the single market and can direct its budget to the new direction that suits its economy better. bajpai expects the raking of uk to decline after brexit.
- Analyzes how dhingra and sampson claim that the uk can reduce its import tariffs below the levels of eu to lower import costs for uk consumers and companies.
- Explains that clarke, goodwin and whiteley suggested three scenarios regarding the relationship between the uk and other eu countries.
- Explains that the report uk trade options beyond 2019 suggests some of the above-mentioned scenarios.
- Explains that the international ranking of uk economy might go backward at the first couple of years after brexit until the government makes new trade agreements with different counties and organisations around the world.
770 wordsRead More