Essay PreviewMore ↓
Alverson, J., Crossen, M. (2002). A Passion for the Impossible: How Theology Provides Insights on Education in General. Proceedings [of the] National Conference on Alternative and External Degree Programs for Adults, (pp. 44-59). Pittsburgh: ERIC.
The full conference proceeding can be found at this website:
Article Summary and Synthesis
This conference proceedings chapter proposes additional and different questions about the theological impact on the classroom and student where theology concerns itself with the direct subject of God and the discipline of the impossible/Unknown (Alverson, Crossen, 2002).
Human experience as related to theology concerns itself with reflection on how “a person as the one who is experiencing” or the person who is aware of themselves as the one who is learning learns where most other disciplines reflect human experience as object by studying the experiences human beings have. Here, a connection to the Senge description of dialogue and metanoia is made. A more subjective personal and changing experience rather than an objective advocacy based discussion. Here, the distinction between dialogue as communication suspending positional advocacy and discussion as the application or argumentation of positional advocacy is critical.
The authors explain that Denis Edwards, author of Human Experiences of God, describes two dynamics of human experience, encounter and interpretation. Encounters are routine and meaningless until interpreted and it is these interpretations that allow human experience. Experiential learning then requires reflection on our interpretive schemes and as such, suggests we are responsible for our experiences. Depending on what interpretive schemata we use to interpret the encounter allows us to shape our experience and choose emotions that improve the experience assuming we desire a positive and learning experience. Once we become more conscious of our interpretive bias, we can choose and enhance our experiences of work, learning, and relationships.
These systems of interpretation and “sense making” are known philosophically as hermeneutics. Where early hermeneutics limited itself to textual interpretations, more contemporary application expanded to include interpretation of the existential experience of the author. Consistent with the arguments made here by Alverson and Crossen, hermeneutics evolved to include an empathic connection between people, things, and their social environment; Max Weber was a key thinker in this school. It is interesting to note that some critical theorists have criticized traditional hermeneutics as being a barrier to social criticism and change. However, modern critical social theory includes hermeneutics as a key philosophy.
We are questioners in an existential sense.
How to Cite this Page
"Theology And Education, Buber, Dialogue, And Metanoia." 123HelpMe.com. 22 Aug 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Martin Buber’s “I and Thou” delivers a philosophy of private dialogue as it describes how personal dialogue can outline the character of reality. The book’s main theme is that life could also be outlined by the manner in which people tend to interact in dialogue with one another, with nature, and with God. According to Buber, a person might have two attitudes: I-Thou or I-It. I-Thou is a subject-to-subject relationship, whereas I-It is a subject-to-object relationship. Within the I-Thou relationship, people are conscious of one another and acknowledge their existence.... [tags: relationship, God]
1266 words (3.6 pages)
- Martin Buber - Dialogue How do we know when communication has served to strengthen relationships between people and expand individual viewpoints. When does communication reach beyond individual goals to promote and develop a sense of community. We can attempt to answer questions like these by exploring Martin Buber’s theory of Dialogue. I. Explanation of theory According to Martin Buber, an essential building block of community is the concept of dialogue. People often think of dialogue as merely script, or an exchange of words.... [tags: Essays Papers]
2945 words (8.4 pages)
- The simple quote by Joey Lawsin, “The Duality of One is the Unity of two” says many things. There are many different ways we could relate this quote throughout our lives; but today I am choosing to relate it to science and religion. With this, Paul Davies is able to open up a dialogue of religion and science through his theoretical beliefs. Ian Barbour proposes four different positions throughout his typology. The first perspective he talks about is conflict. Those who fall under the conflict category are those who try to prove religion with science.... [tags: Paul Davies theoretical beliefs]
572 words (1.6 pages)
- The problem with religious and secular worldviews in Martin Buber’s I and Thou is that their conceptions of the highest good, in other words, the possibility of loving well, are clouded by teleological ways of interaction. For Buber, the possibility of loving well, an authentic existence, lies in one’s relation to God but God is only relatable through relations with other people. In this essay, I argue that Buber responds adequately to the problem posed by modern religion and society by providing a dualistic framework which balances teleological and relational modes of existence.... [tags: Meaning of life, Religion, Martin Buber, Ontology]
2036 words (5.8 pages)
- At first glance, evangelicals and liberation theologians seem rather different. On average, American evangelicals are middle-aged white Southerners, have conservative and republican ideologies, and historically originate from the tradition of fundamentalist Protestantism. Liberation theologians, on the other hand, come from a diverse array of backgrounds and historical contexts but in general are tied to the needs of a community and concerned with the transformation of social existence. Yet, when one considers what evangelicalism and liberation theology are at their core, where they come from, and what is central to them, similarities subsist.... [tags: christians, concervatives, god]
1307 words (3.7 pages)
- The Emergence of Liberation Theology in Latin America and Africa Liberation theology originated in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s in South Africa. Liberation theology started because poor people of South Africa were being subjected to harsh treatments by those of higher authority, because the poor were oppressed they decided that it was finally time for them stand up for themselves and voice their opinion for themselves. The oppressed poor people were forced to deal with the lack of food supply, the lack of shelters, the lack of education and medical care.... [tags: Christianity, Theology, Oppression]
1559 words (4.5 pages)
- Liberation theology is religious phenomenon which bursts on the scene in the 1960’s. A consciousness for injustice was always prevalent in the Church, but the “theologies of liberation, particularly the classical Latin American variety, evolved in protest against the inability in Western church and missionary circles, both Catholic and Protestant, to grapple with the problems of systemic injustice.” (Boch 443) To truly understand the critiques of missiology which have been articulated by Latin American liberation theologies and Asian theologies, one must first understand liberation.... [tags: Theology, Church]
1002 words (2.9 pages)
- High School Dialogue ME- So much to do so little time. What did he say. What paper. Oh crap I have a doctor’s appointment at 4 o’clock. I forgot to tell coach. I’m in trouble. Did I leave the curling iron on, mom’s gonna kill me. Ohh I forgot to wash the dishes last night. What paper is he talking about. I did my biology, Spanish and that paper for theology. I wonder if I have to work next Friday. Hopefully I get out of the doctors on time, my boss hates it when I’m late but I should be okay I don’t start till 6 o’clock.... [tags: Dialogue Essays]
1168 words (3.3 pages)
- Arising out recent class discussion topics touching on the ideas of James Cone’s ideas on Liberation Theology and the relationship between the Cross and the Lynching Tree, our group decided to focus the topic of our presentation around Liberation Theology. However, in order to create a counter argument to stimulate further discourse, we introduced the Theology of Prosperity, as an opposing theological concept, to our presentation. Hence, we came up with the topic of Liberation Theology vs. Theology of Prosperity.... [tags: Theology]
1064 words (3 pages)
- There were various theologies of the sacrament of Holy Communion that were being debated during the Reformation. Among reformers there were conflicting views on transubstantiation, consubstantiation, infant baptism and Christ’s importance of being in communion overall. Some reformers and reformation events that appealed believers more than others were Martin Luther, Ulrich Zwingli, John Calvin and the Council of Trent. Martin Luther was a German priest who rebelled against authorities of the Roman Catholic Church and initiated the start of the reformation.... [tags: Theology ]
1361 words (3.9 pages)
Like Martin Buber, Karl Rahner, one of the most influential Roman Catholic theologians and influential participant in the Second Vatican Council, suggests an open minded reflection or dialogue between the orthodox biblical interpretation and the realities of modern civilization. Here the encounter is tempered by interpretation allowing a new personal experience. In effect, what was desired was a new and different way of “seeing”, both outward and inward looking. In this chapter, Alverson & Crossen suggest that if we look hard enough and deep enough, “we will discover insights that will help us negotiate our existence in a meaningful way.” While Martin Buber as philosopher, psychologist, and theologian describes this same idea in the “I-It” and “I-Thou” context, Karl Rahner focuses on the mystery only from a theologians perspective. Interestingly, while the Second Vatican describes the source of truth as the church, it also recognizes many truths can be found outside the confines of the church. In this context, it seems to me that we, as secular persons, would be well served to explore within theology truths that allow an enhanced metanoic understanding.
This mystery becomes a central basis for the human thirst for knowledge and “openness to the mystery dimension of life immerses us more deeply in the practical realm of the world and of human relationships.” As Senge describes in his “systems thinking” discipline, it is this interconnectedness between ideas and things, subjective and objective, and denying an either-or choice, walking the Buberesque “rocky ridge of uncertainty” that gives antinomy (reconciling incomprehensible opposing truths) such power. The authors point out the primacy of mystery dictates an “authentic rational enquiry” and must not be about our own egos. The mystery possesses a teleological quality where our enquiry provides a forward thinking purpose leading to a desired action striving to “bring order out of disorder,” and understanding out of chaos
Senge explains his synthesis of dialogue based on the ideas of David Bohm in Chapter 12, Team Learning, Discussion and Dialogue. David Bohm, a nuclear particle physicist whose doctoral research provided pivotal new science to facilitate the manufacture of the nuclear bombs that ended the second world was denied defense of his own doctoral dissertation because he was deemed a security risk. This is relevant because this seeming covert “systems approach” to the US wartime and post war McCarthyism “group think” played a role in his development of what is now known as Bohmian Dialogue. It is the work of others like Senge, and indirectly here, Alverson and Crossen who have taken Bohm’s idea of dialogue and expand the “systems thinking” arena to include disciplines like theology. As such, the richness and meaning of dialogue have increased to allow a different way to understand the Incomprehensible Mystery. And, in turn, if we choose to accept the benefit of a theological interpretive scheme in our secular dialogue, understanding of the comprehensible mysteries will be less difficult.
Imagination provides another central basis for interpretation and new understanding because it has the power to re-describe reality. From a theological perspective, the “voice behind the voice” can provide new meaning and again depends on our interpretive schemata or perspective. Who is the voice behind the voice? How do their interpretive schemata affect our ability to understand? It is these interpretive imaginations that can allow dialogue to reach its full potential through asking “How can I see this in a different way not seen before by letting go of previous interpretations of reality allowing myself new possibilities of meaning?” It is there to see if we allow ourselves to think in radically new ways, systems thinking ways.
The authors offer a caveat, we may not be able to see things differently if we choose not to make the journey of “movement and change” because of the “horror of self encounter”. Here the journey may be prohibitively frightening because we cannot leave what is comfortable and known. By choosing not to journey, we have decided we do not want, or are not capable of attaining knowledge allowing action and change. The person who decides to journey will experience good and bad encounters and depending on their interpretive open mindedness, both obstacles and pleasant surprises become “opportunities for greater self knowledge, deeper wisdom; for humility.” From the theological perspective, the educator’s role is to lead the students to the journey and inspire their courage to decide the journey is “work well worth doing.”
The second caveat tells us we cannot make the journey and stay the same; we cannot avoid the change because by making the journey, what we learn about ourselves, our self-revelation, opens the door to the Mysterium Tremendum et Fascinus: a tremendous, terrifying, yet fascinating mystery. While many cannot embark because of fear of the sinister or hurtful parts of their character, perceived or real, as frightening as it may seem these things must be faced if there is any hope of growth in our personal and collective humanity. Authentic learning is not casual or for the weak-of-heart. However, it is an adventure and as with all adventures, there is risk and consequence to consider. What we cannot understand, without a teleological context, the risk is uncertainty and discomfort, and the consequence is personal growth and change.
“Getting beyond our fears of journeying helps us to discover that we can actually love ourselves, befriend ourselves by becoming our own best journey companion. The self that we are is the only self that we can love. To refuse to know it is to refuse to love it.”
Gender bias and interpretive schemes can play a role in our ability to fully experience love (remembering the encounter-interpretation experience dyad). The authors quote this line from the movie, Sex, Lies, and Videotapes, “A Man loves the person he is interested in; a woman becomes interested in the man she loves.” The relevance is that the love of learning the authors describe in their paper is the love the woman describes: love precedes knowledge.
Without love, we cannot experience true authentic learning.
While in the theological sense community is predicated on the common belief in Christ, within the educational realm it is difficult to create community based on a belief not all share. Rather, the authors suggest creating community larger than the classroom itself, a metanoic community it seems. This larger community consists of society, academy, and the Church. They suggest theology cannot operate independently and must always consider the three parts of the larger community. Interestingly, even though theology is inseparable from faith, theology “can never use faith to exempt itself from rational discourse within the academy.” This means, contrary to the inquisition of the dark ages, faith can be questioned and our imaginations can help us re-define reality and also, to learn to understand. The notion of community does not address “learning community” or at least not directly. However, the authors position the classroom within a community that allows learning to occur in such a way as to allow participants to understand how to learn from the other in a theological and dialogic sense consistent with the Buber I-It, I-Thou dialogic philosophy and to a lesser extent the Senge disciplines.
The authors make a connection between the medieval universities and the role theology played. Theology provides the passion for the impossible comprehension of the mystery and in turn, creates a desire to learn more accepting we will never fully understand.