Socrates sounds contradictory in his statements, but the case is quite the opposite. He believes each statement as truth, but doesn’t elaborate on the second statement as much. To explain this, I will evaluate Socrates defense in court. He first clarifies to the jury, “I would say to you, ‘Gentlemen of the jury, I am grateful and I am your friend, but I will obey the god rather than you, and as long as I explains he will disobey their commands, but what Socrates said before the trial is key to understanding what he means in this statement. He believes that he is being tried in an unjust way. To bring this up, he first explains to the court the charges that he is being tried for; corrupting the youth of Athens through practicing philosophy and accepting gods not recognized by the state.
During the trial, Socrates, accused of being a bad influence on the youth of Athens, questions Meletus about who is giving the youth good influence. Meletus responds by saying the judges, councilors, and members of the Assembly had a major influence on the youth. They possessed expertise and knowledge about the law. Socrates reasons with Melet...
... middle of paper ...
...e they contradict each other completely. Rather, these two statements made by Socrates make sense together, he just didn’t finish his second statement. He needed to conclude the statement with a stipulation of obeying the commands of a city, only if they are used justly. If laws are not carried out in a just way, then they do not apply, since a person is not breaking any rules of the city.
The whole situation that Socrates was put in was very unjust. He was put on trial for a crime he did not commit. He acted very justly during the trial, trying to reason with Meletus and the judges, but was found guilty of not recognizing the Greek gods, even though there was no evidence found. Socrates was just trying to be a good guy, supporting justice, without corrupting the youth of the nation, and was killed for voicing and defending the principles he was trying to support.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Plato’s “Defense of Socrates” follows the trial of Socrates for charges of corruption of the youth. His accuser, Meletus, claims he is doing so by teaching the youth of Athens of a separate spirituality from that which was widely accepted. Socrates’ argument was unique in that he tried to convince the jury he was just an average man and not to be feared, but in actuality demonstrated how clever and tenacious he was. He begins with an anecdote of his visit to the Oracle of Delphi, which told him that there was no man smarter than he.... [tags: essays research papers]
589 words (1.7 pages)
- Socrates and the Self Defense Problem The question of Morality and what it means: Throughout the recorded history of man, there has been a series of questions continually asked by each generation. ³Who are we. Where are we going. Why. Is there a God?² Are just a few of the questions that continue to engage the minds of so many today. But perhaps the most difficult one to really grasp has to do with the theories of ethics and morality, or in layman¹s terms, ³What is good and bad, and how do we live our lives to uphold the good while shunning the bad?² As time has gone on there have been many theories and ideas proposed, ranging from the divine hand theory (dealing with how organized re... [tags: Papers]
663 words (1.9 pages)
- In modern society, wisdom can be defined as the quality of having experience, knowledge, and moral judgment; the quality of being wise. However, Socrates had the idea that wisdom was knowing oneself. Socrates’s was beyond brilliant compared to the average Athenian; he was self-aware and just. Although Socrates tended to meddle in the affairs of others, he consequently had the ability to spark enlightenment among the people in Athens. To Socrates, philosophy served as the study of humans. He highlights this in The Apology when he goes from one social group to the next in search for the wisest of all the land.... [tags: Plato, Knowledge, Athenian democracy, Delphi]
918 words (2.6 pages)
- Socrates a classical Greek philosopher and character of Plato’s book Phaedo, defines a philosopher as one who has the greatest desire of acquiring knowledge and does not fear death or the separation of the body from the soul but should welcome it. Even in his last days Socrates was in pursuit of knowledge, he presents theories to strengthen his argument that the soul is immortal. His attempts to argue his point can’t necessarily be considered as convincing evidence to support the existence of an immortal soul.... [tags: Classical Greek Philosopher, Literary Analysis]
936 words (2.7 pages)
- Socrates was one of the first true intellectuals in human history. The societal conventions of his time condemned intellectual enlightenment. They viewed secular knowledge as an obstruction of the path to spiritual enlightenment which was far superior to any intellectual exploits. Socrates was a revolutionary thinker in that he recognized the benefits and importance of studying temporal elements instead of devoting his life to religion. In the eyes of his contemporaries, Socrates' blatant defiance of tradition and religion as the sole importance of life and thought was so unorthodox that it was punishable by death.... [tags: Philosophy]
852 words (2.4 pages)
- Socrates will be praised for his wisdom and contributions to western thinking for a very long time. Some of his ideas prevail today among philosophers, and his thinking has shaped modern science. Perhaps we should throw out the book, considering his botched defense. Socrates claims to know nothing and we should take his word for it. Socrates did a poor job in defending his own life in court, so why should we use his tools and devices to this day in our persuasive arguments. It seems clear that Socrates did nearly everything in his power to have himself executed.... [tags: Logic, Argument, Philosophy, Aristotle]
1102 words (3.1 pages)
- Socrates’s apology displays his deep knowledge in philosophy as the Delphic Oracle stated ”there is no person living wiser than Socrates”. The greatest example of Socrates trial and death validates the close relationship between his character and philosophy. He believed that philosophy should triumph in practical results for the greater well being of society. Socrates attempted to establish an ethical system based on human reason rather than theological teaching. He pointed out that human choice was driven by the desire for happiness, and infinite wisdom comes from knowing oneself.... [tags: Ethics, Virtue, Plato, Aristotle]
2461 words (7 pages)
- In Plato’s Apology, when Socrates is pleading his defence, he makes a good argument against the charges of corrupting the youth of Athens. This is evident when he states that, firstly, Meletus, the man who is trying to get Socrates executed, has never cared about the youth of Athens and has no real knowledge on the subject. Secondly, Socrates states that if he was in some way corrupting the youth, then he was doing it unintentionally or unwillingly, in which case he was brought to court for no reason.... [tags: Corruption, Political corruption, Plato, Aristotle]
785 words (2.2 pages)
- An Examination of Socrates' Attitude Towards Death and Dying When presented with a problem or argument Socrates, the philosopher, attacked most issues with a relatively disingenuous attitude. A question or idea would be presented and he would automatically respond with either another question or a new philosophy for his opposite party to ponder. These were the ways of Socrates, an intelligent yet humble man who knew the limits of his knowledge. And through his passion for knowledge and quest for the meaning of life, Socrates often stumbled across the theme of death and dying.... [tags: Papers]
1120 words (3.2 pages)
- After admitting that he does not know what virtue is almost halfway through Plato’s Meno, Meno states a few premises involving the acquisition of knowledge, which coined the term Meno’s paradox. In this paradox Meno says that virtue or knowledge is impossible to learn because of it. Meno then questions Socrates on how they can find what virtue is if they can’t discover it which I believe Socrates resolves by stating the theory of recollection and how the theory of recollection shows one part of the premise false by conversing with the slave boy.... [tags: Plato, Virtue, Ethics, Justice]
1579 words (4.5 pages)