Skip to Content (press Enter/Return)
preview

Plato's Apology: The Argument For Corrupting The Youth Of Plato

analytical Essay
785 words
Open Document
785 words
  • Small
  • Normal
  • Large
  • Huge
bookmark

In Plato’s Apology, when Socrates is pleading his defence, he makes a good argument against the charges of corrupting the youth of Athens. This is evident when he states that, firstly, Meletus, the man who is trying to get Socrates executed, has never cared about the youth of Athens and has no real knowledge on the subject. Secondly, Socrates states that if he was in some way corrupting the youth, then he was doing it unintentionally or unwillingly, in which case he was brought to court for no reason. Finally, Socrates brings to light the fact that Meletus doesn’t have a single witness to attest to Socrates’ corruption. This is how Socrates proves his argument that he isn’t responsible for corrupting the youth of Athens. Socrates’ first premise …show more content…

When asked if there’s anyone in the world who would knowingly choose to be harmed, Meletus replies with “Of course not.”, yet he still insists that Socrates intentionally corrupts the youth (p. 56). Socrates knows that those who are wicked will not only cause harm to strangers, but also will cause harm to those who are close to them (p. 56). Socrates is close to those he teaches and does not want to bring harm to himself (p. 56). Therefore, Socrates would never intentionally corrupt the youth (p.56). Socrates goes on to argue that even if he was unwillingly corrupting the youth of Athens, Meletus’ charges would still hold no real value as it would be an involuntary misdemeanor (p. 56).When somebody unknowingly commits a crime they aren’t summoned to court, they are taken aside and made to see the error of their ways (p. 56). So why was Socrates dragged to court? If someone had tried to enlighten Socrates, and had helped him to see that what he was doing was wrong, then he would have stopped doing that which was unintentional (p. 56). Socrates concludes this part of his argument by stating that no one had tried to enlighten him and by once again questioning why he was brought to court, when court is intended for people who need to be punished, not for people who need to be enlightened (p.

In this essay, the author

  • Analyzes how socrates makes a good argument against the charges of corrupting the youth of athens in plato's apology.
  • Analyzes how socrates' first premise is that meletus has never before cared about the youth of athens, and certainly does not now.
  • Analyzes how socrates' second premise is that his corruption, if it exists, is entirely unintentional.
Continue ReadingCheck Writing Quality

Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!

  • Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!
Related
  • analytical
  • opinion
  • Plato And Plato's Apology
    analytical essay
    The myth of the Ring of Gyges has transcended hundred of years, thusly making it a ‘tale as old as time’. Modern adaptations of this myth include JRR Tolkien’s, “Lord of the Ring” series as an example. Through this legend and others, like the myth of metals, Plato is able to demonstrate what one ought to do if one is set owner of the infamous Ring of Gyges, ergo the argumentation of why one ought to act justly. If I had a magic ring such as the Ring of Gyges I would be inclined to act mischievously, but would wind up acting as though I did not have the ring. To fully understand my position, if I had a magic ring, can only be fully comprehended once the purpose of the ring, pertaining to morality is understood. I feel as though the Socrates of The Apology and of The Republic would answer in a consistent way. Namely, that regardless of possession of the ring or not, one should act justly.

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes plato's argumentation of why one ought to act justly if one is set owner of the infamous ring of gyges.
    • Analyzes how plato addresses the issue of how justice becomes a virtue in society in the republic, the apology, and the ring of gyges.
    • Paraphrases the legend of the ring of gyges. adjustment of a ring allows the wearer to become invisible, free of moral, legal, or ethical codes. glaucon claims that no matter how the owner acts, they will be inclined to act deviously.
    1397 words
    Read More
  • The Trail Of Socrates And The Apology Of Plato
    analytical essay
    In Plato’s Apology it seems that overall Socrates did an effective job using the 3 acts of the mind. The three acts of the mind are: Understanding, Judgment, and Reasoning. These acts are stragically used to rebut the charges made against him during trial. The two charges that are formed against Socrates are corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods. The first act of the mind that we will be looking at is, understanding. The question that needs to be asked is what does corruption mean? The accuser believe that Socrates in corrupting the minds of the children by introducing new concepts. Socrates is trying to teach and involve the minds of the youth by getting them to ask question. It is very important that people are always asking questions about why things are. The next question that needs to be address is what does not believe in the gods mean? Socrates believes in God but that is one god that rules the world, not multiple gods who together rule. They are mad that he has “created” his own god.

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes how socrates uses judgment to rebut his charges. he is accused of being an atheist because he doesn't believe in the gods.
    • Analyzes how socrates uses reasoning to rebut the arguments that he is the only one that corrupts the youth.
    • Analyzes how socrates used the 3 acts of the mind to rebut the charges made against him during trial.
    1011 words
    Read More
  • Socrates Was NOT Guilty
    analytical essay
    Socrates was not guilty as charged; he had done nothing wrong, as seen in the Apology. Not even a priest could tell Socrates what he had done wrong religiously, Euthyphro wasn’t even able to give Socrates a precise definition of piety. It is then questioned by Crito why Socrates would remain to face a penalty for a crime he did not commit. In the Crito, it is explained why, although innocent, Socrates must accept the penalties his peers have set upon him. It is his peers that will interpret and enforce the laws, not the law which will enforce it. Even if the enforcers don’t deserve attention and respect because they have no real knowledge to the situation, Socrates had put himself under their judgment by going to the trial. Therefore, Socrates must respect the decisions made by the masses because the decisions are made to represent the laws, which demand each citizen’s respect.

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes how socrates was both innocent and guilty as charged in plato's five dialogues. he was not guilty of the crimes he was accused of by meletus.
    • Analyzes how euthyphro's dialogue relates religion and justice to one another and the manner in which they correlate.
    • Analyzes how socrates aimed to defend his ideas and principles, continue to teach those who will open their mind, and state that he knew that all five hundred and one jurors knew who
    1660 words
    Read More
  • Plato’s Apology: Fake Charges
    analytical essay
    ...everything in Athens improves the youth except for Socrates. This statement by Melatus illustrates that Melatus doesn’t have any knowledge on how to help the youth and that his main intention is to get Socrates sentenced to death.

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes how socrates accusers, in particular melatus, are contradicting themselves. he refutes this argument by glorifying the oracle as a god.
    • Analyzes how socrates and melatus argue about his motives to corrupt the youth.
    • Analyzes how the final accusation against socrates is invalid for multiple reasons. he does not teach the youth to follow his teachings nor summon for them to listen to him.
    1126 words
    Read More
  • The Unxamined Life In Plato's Apology
    analytical essay
    In Plato’s Apology, the story of Socrates was portrayed. He was known as an extremely wise man who felt knowledge was power. Socrates lived his life by trying to do what was right and being a virtuous person. However, not everyone saw him this way. Socrates had many enemies and was not well liked in the city of Athens. Eventually, these enemies put Socrates on trial. As Socrates believed in the person he was and knew he had done nothing wrong he chose not to flee Athens. Instead, he went to court and defended himself. Throughout the trial Socrates told the truthful story from the Oracle of Delphi and how he tried to disprove it, he had many accusations against him, and he believed that the unexamined life was not worth living.

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes how plato's apology depicted socrates as an extremely wise man who felt knowledge was power. however, not everyone saw him this way.
    • Narrates how socrates disproved the oracle of delphi by interviewing wise people in athens and confronting them about their lack of wisdom.
    • Analyzes how athens turned against socrates after he was accused of corrupting the youth's minds.
    1038 words
    Read More
  • Socrates irrelgious or impious
    analytical essay
    ...ed the jurors then he did not persuade them to the fullest. On the other hand, Socrates has a reputation of being ‘wise’ and a seeker for answers, they automatically have a predisposition of who he is and nothing will convince the jurors because if they do set him free then that would make them look bad. Socrates is neither ‘irreligious’ nor ‘impious’ because even though Meletus wrongly accused him of being an atheist that does not justify Socrates philosophical way of thinking. Socrates is highly astute and his foes beget fables because they believe that he is doing something bad and persuading the people of Athens to believe in other ideological beliefs. He is too astute and sage beyond their comprehension and they believe he is breaking the standard norms of Athena when he was actually improving the city/state of Athens he was a free thinker and open minded.

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes how socrates ideologies and philosophical theologies transpire in the dramatizations of plato in the euthyphro and defense of sokrates.
    • Analyzes how socrates' theologies are expressed throughout a conversation of religion and political, moral obligation between him and euthyphro.
    • Analyzes socrates' belief that what is approved by one god can be disapproved by another depending on what the punishment is.
    987 words
    Read More
  • Socrates In The Apology
    analytical essay
    In the opening of The Apology, Socrates informed the jurors how he intends to address them, what they should pay attention to in his remarks, and what he sees as his greatest obstacle in gaining an acquittal. How does he intend to address the jury? Socrates’ approach towards addressing the jury is way different than what you would see a normal defendant doing. Socrates does not stand in front of the jury and beg that he doesn’t get charged. Instead, Socrates believes that you shouldn’t have to cry and beg for the right to live in court if the defendant has done nothing wrong. The first thing that he says when speaking to the jury was to basically hear him out, and listen to even if he started to talk in his language of habit. He then said they should excuse that because he is seventy years old and has never appeared in court. “I must beg of you to grant me one favor, If you hear me using the same words in my defense which I have been in habit of using, and which most of you may have heard in the agora, and at the table of the money-changers, or anywhere else, I would ask you to not be surprised at this, and bot to interrupt me (Dover p. 19).”

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes how socrates' approach to addressing the jury is different from what you would see a normal defendant doing. he believes that you shouldn't have to cry and beg for the right to live in court.
    • Explains why socrates fears the older charges more than the specific ones he is charged with.
    • Opines that socrates adopted a wise strategy for winning over the jury. he will make his defense, and endeavor in the short time which is allowed to do away with this evil opinion of me.
    769 words
    Read More
  • The Apology and Crito
    opinion essay
    Plato’s "Apology" gives the substance of the defense made by Socrates to the Athenians at his trial. Meletus, Anytus and Lyncon brought Socrates to court on charges of corrupting the morals of the youth, leading the youth away from the principals of democracy, neglecting the Gods of the State and introducing new divinities.

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes how plato's "apology" gives the substance of the defense made by socrates to the athenians at his trial.
    • Opines that socrates' defense at his trial was not strong enough to convince the athenians to set him free of all charges.
    • Explains that socrates was wise men, who question everything, and was found to be the wise man in athens by the oracle.
    345 words
    Read More
  • Defense of Socrates
    analytical essay
    The first main argument in support of the thesis is that it is society’s job to educate the youth and Socrates argues that it is impossible for just one man to corrupt the youth. This is the first mistake made by Meletus, as he makes the absurd overstatement that “every Athenian improves and elevates [the youth]; all with the exception of [Socrates],” who alone is their corrupter. Socrates goes on to defend himself by alluding to a horse analogy. Socrates argues that (P1) trainers improve horses, (P2) all others who simply ride horses, injure or corrupt horses, (P3) there are fewer trainers than riders, (P4) therefore, those who corrupt horses are in smaller number than those who ride horses and we can conclude that (C) people are corrupted by a majority rather than a minority. Socrates believes that this analogy to horses must be true of all animals and furthermore, for all people. Socrates utilizes this analogy to point out that Meletus’ overstatement is rather ironic, since according to Meletus all other beings except for the youth in the world are more likely to be corrupted by a majority rather than a minority. For this reason, it is more logical that the youth have been corrupted by a majority like the judges, senators, and the Athenians rather than one man, Socrates. Meletus’ overstatement and inability to defend himself reflects poorly on his character and further gives more authority to Socrates as it seems that Meletus is only arguing for the sake of argument and that he has no true evidence to prove that Socrates is guilty of corrupting the youth.

    In this essay, the author

    • Argues that socrates is not guilty of corrupting youth with the idea of not believing in the gods but of teaching them to think for themselves by looking to new divinities.
    • Analyzes how socrates argues that it is impossible for just one man to corrupt the youth. meletus' overstatement and inability to defend himself reflects poorly on his character.
    • Analyzes how meletus contradicts himself by saying that socrates both believes and does not believe in the gods.
    1586 words
    Read More
  • Plato's Apology
    analytical essay
    In the retelling of his trial by his associate, Plato, entitled “The Apology”; Socrates claims in his defense that he only wishes to do good for the polis. I believe that Socrates was innocent of the accusations that were made against him, but he possessed contempt for the court and displayed that in his conceitedness and these actions led to his death.

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes plato's apology, in which socrates claims that he only wishes to do good for the polis.
    • Analyzes how socrates was accused of bringing false gods into the polis and corrupting the youth. his followers were mostly wealthy young men with not much to do.
    • Opines that socrates' high respect for himself may have started with the oracle from delphi, when chaerephon, “...asked the oracle to tell him whether there was anyone wiser than i was.”
    807 words
    Read More
  • Comparison Between Crito And Apology by Plato
    analytical essay
    Plato's The Apology is an account of the speech. Socrates makes at the trial in which he is charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the state, inventing new gods, and corrupting the youth of Athens. For the most part, Socrates speaks in a very plain, conversational manner. He explains that he has no experience with the law courts and that he will instead speak in the manner to which he is accustomed with honesty and directness. Socrates then proceeds to interrogate Meletus, the man primarily responsible for bringing Socrates before the jury. He strongly attacks Meletus for wasting the court¡¦s time on such absurd charges. He then argues that if he corrupted the young he did so unknowingly since Socrates believes that one never deliberately acts wrongly. If Socrates neither did not corrupt the young nor did so unknowingly, then in both cases he should not be brought to trial. The other charge is the charge of impiety. This is when Socrates finds an inconsistency in Meletus¡¦ belief that Socrates is impious. If he didn¡¦t believe in any gods then it would be inconsistent to say that he believed in spiritual things, as gods are a form of a spiritual thing. He continues to argue against the charges, often asking and answering his own questions as if he were speaking in a conversation with one of his friends. He says that once a man has found his passion in life it would be wrong of him to take into account the risk of life or death that such a passion might involve.

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes how plato's crito and apology reveals that socrates is an enduring person with imagination. he presents us with a mass of contradictions; he is at once the most athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic philosopher.
    • Analyzes how plato's the apology is an account of socrates' speech at the trial in which he is charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the state.
    • Analyzes how socrates remains true to his way of life even though he is on trial for his life, and will probably be sentenced to death.
    1631 words
    Read More
  • An Apology From Socrates
    analytical essay
    In his examination of Meletus, Socrates makes three main points: 1) Meletus has accused Socrates of being the only corrupter, while everyone else improves the youth. Socrates then uses an analogy: a horse trainer is to horses as an improver is to the youth. The point is that there is only one improver, not many. 2) If Socrates corrupts the youth, either it is intentional or unintentional. No one would corrupt his neighbor intentionally, because he would harm himself in the process. If the corruption was unintentional, then the court is not the place to resolve the problem. The other possibility is that he does not corrupt them at all. 3) In frustration, Meletus accuses Socrates of being "a complete atheist," at the same time he claims Socrates teaches new gods. Thus, Meletus contradicts himself. Socrates argues that fear of death is foolish, because it is not known if death is a good or an evil, thus there is no reason to fear death.

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes how socrates' accusers cautioned the jury against his eloquence. the earlier group is the hardest to defend against, since they do not appear in court.
    • Analyzes how socrates contradicts himself by accusing meletus of being the only corrupter, while everyone else improves the youth.
    • Analyzes how socrates does not throw himself on the mercy of the court. he tells the jury about their responsibility to ignore the appeals to pity and judge the truth.
    1717 words
    Read More
  • How Does Socrates Corrupt Youth
    analytical essay
    The official charges that Socrates is charged with are corrupting the young, and not acknowledging the gods the city acknowledges, but new daimonic activities instead. Socrates responds cross-examining Meletus in which he says that Meletus does not actually care about these things. Then continues to explain the flaws in the charge of him corrupting the youth in a way of questioning Meletus to say who improves the youths. Meletus says basically everyone but Socrates improves the youths. So, the youth should be in a happy situation if only one person is corrupting them while everyone else is improving them. But if he is corrupting the youth, it is surely by accident and since it is by accident how can he be brought before the court because he

    In this essay, the author

    • Analyzes how socrates is charged with corrupting the young, not acknowledging gods, but new daimonic activities instead.
    271 words
    Read More
  • The Apology of Socrates: Guilty or Innocent?
    analytical essay
    In any case of law, when considering truth and justice, one must first look at the validity of the court and the system itself.  In Socrates' case, the situation is no different.  One may be said to be guilty or innocent of any crime, but guilt or innocence is only as valid as the court it is subjected to.  Therefore, in considering whether Socrates is guilty or not, it must be kept in mind the norms and standards of Athens at that time, and the validity of his accusers and the crimes he allegedly committed.  Is Socrates guilty or innocent of his accusations?

    In this essay, the author

    • Explains that in any case of law, when considering truth and justice, one must first look at the validity of the court and the system itself.
    • Analyzes how socrates is charged with impiety, a person who does not believe in the gods of athens.
    • Explains that socrates is accused of not respecting those of authority and those with reputations of being wise, and protraying his role in life as to question these fiqures in their wisdom.
    943 words
    Read More
  • Socrates And Anytus
    opinion essay
    Anytus, and Lycon. Socrates believed that these three accused him of corrupting the youth due to the fact that he found them to be less wise than he. Socrates approached these three individuals in their respective fields as they were said to be the wisest, but Socrates questioned their wisdom. Due to their knowledge in their respective fields they carried ignorance into other pursuit when they truly knew nothing. The accusations of the crime came from the following: Meletus on behalf of the poets, Anytus on behalf of the craftsman & politicians, and Lycon on behalf of the orators. Socrates deposes Meletus and questions his accusations on what seems to be logic. One statement being, how

    In this essay, the author

    • Opines that socrates was accused by meletus, anytus and lycon of corrupting the youth.
    216 words
    Read More
Continue Reading