Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The notion of trinity
The Nicene Creed appointed the roles of trinity by using the familiar triad set forth by Plato. God maintains His position as the Father and most important; Jesus becomes a divine human - born of the Father and the Holy Spirit; and the Holy Spirit brings knowledge and truths which are set forth by both the Father and Son. “The true foundation upon which the doctrine rests is God himself… it is God as he acted in history, entering our world as a Jewish carpenter named Jesus, dying and rising again to save. It is God as he acted in history at Pentecost, descending as the Spirit to share life with the Christian church.” Thus the Trinity Doctrine was born out of Plato’s triad. The Goodness is God; the ideas are Jesus; and the World-Spirit is the Holy Spirit. All were the same theory except reshaped in order to fit into Christian doctrine.
While the divine aspects of Christianity are obviously derived from Plato’s theories, it is also important to discuss human nature – more specifically the idea of the immortal soul. Plato believed in the idea that the human soul is immortal and returns to the Goodness once freed from the body and purified. This is stated in Phaedo. Plato writes, “Our souls must exist in the other world, for if not, how could they have been born again?” According to Plato, the soul is reborn in another world once the body dies. It does not cease to exist – it merely changes planes. This is a theory that has no place in the Old Testament, but does have one in the New Testament. It can be concluded that Christianity adopted yet another Platonist theory into its own doctrine.
Prior to the usage of Plato’s immortal soul theory, the Old Testament focused on absolute death. In Genesis 35:18, it is written that, “Her soul...
... middle of paper ...
...that the hell of Plato does – one of punishment.
The New Testament’s version of Hell does follow the Platonist theory. This Hell is one of punishment for the souls of the corrupt who did not adhere to God’s teachings. This punishment is severe for the sinner – far more so than what Plato’s version of hell dictated. In 2 Thessalonians, it is revealed that, “The Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with his mighty angels in flaming fire, inflicting vengeance on those who do not know God and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. They will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might.” Both versions of Hell (Platonist and Christian) depict an afterlife of suffering and eternal punishment for the soul of the wicked; something that is decidedly absent from the Hell of the Old Testament.
Hick deconstructs the Platonic notion of the duality between the soul and the body. Plato, one of the most influential Greek philosophers who has affected the realm of philosophy and religion, argues that the spirit is eternal and the body a vessel. For him the spirit and the body belong to different worlds: the spirit to the “unchanging realities…or universals or eternal ideas.” and the body to the sensible world. In turn, the soul being related to a world of higher calling and truths exists the body after death and leaves the sensible world behind, proving the existence of the immortality of the soul. Also, Plato argues for the immortality of the soul by claiming that only composite things can be destroyed. The soul is not composite because it is simple—a concept that cannot be further broken down and examined. Hick shows how Plato's logic is flawed...
Plato argued that when your physical body dies, your soul remains. The Greek philosopher said that “death is the separation of the soul and the body”. Plato concluded that the soul is immortal because, in the Realm of Forms, it is part of the Life Form, and since one object cannot have two contradicting Forms, for example, Life and Death, the soul cannot die. Many Greeks believed in reincarnation and this provided a possible answer for
Bruder and Kenneth (2014) wrote that Plato also had his own theory of souls. According to Plato’s Republic, the human soul consists of three different elements. One of these souls consists of raw appetites. This soul includes our basic desires for various pleasures, comforts, physical satisfaction, and bodily ease (Kerns, n.d). Another of Plato’s souls consists of drives, or anger and ambition (Bruder & Kenneth, 2014, p.288). Kerns (n.d) described this soul as being spirited, in this sense meaning to be with high-energy and power, or hot blooded. It gets angry when it perceives injustice, for example, being done. This is also the part if us that loves to face and overcome great challenges, as well as loves victory, winning, challenge, and honor.
In the Bible, there are several references that help me to better understand this thought—in fact the word ‘soul’ is used nearly 800 times in the Bible. In Ecclesiastes 9:5-6 it says “For the living know that they will die; but the dead know nothing, and they have no more reward, for the memory of them is forgotten. Also their love, their hatred, and their envy have now perished; Nevermore will they have a share in anything done under the sun.” This verse means that the soul and body die together. In Genesis 2:7, God breathes life into Adam and he becomes a living soul, meaning that before, he was not a living soul. On the other hand, I did find a verse that could mean the soul is separated from the body at death: “Then the dust will return to the earth as it was, And the spirit will return to God who gave it.” Ecclesiastes 12:7. I also found a verse that means the soul does not die unless God destroys it: "Do not fear those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” Matthew
Around the time after Jesus’ resurrection, Christians were confused and they needed answers. Jesus was just arisen from the dead. The Church now had Jesus and God to look to, but who was the leader of it all? Who were they to worship? Where does the Spirit fit into all of this? After many questions, they looked to Scripture. Christians have had the belief of Monotheism and that there is One God. Yet, it wasn’t until the Church looked to Scripture that they pieced together what is now known as the Holy Trinity.
If we try to find the history of the body in terms of philosophy, we may think of the body as a prison or dungeon. Plato’s idea of the body comes from his arguments that Orphic priest presents the meaning of “body”, where a major aspect of their idea was that a man is imprisoned inside the body as in a dungeon. As it is demonstrated in Grosz’s book Volatile Bodies, Plato believes that our body is a prison for the soul, reason or mind. Following this concept of the body are Christian religious beliefs that the immortal soul given by god is associated with the divinity and mortality while the body is just a mortal, sinful, and lustful carnality (Grosz 5). This concept of this body as a prison can be found on the short story of Ortiz Cofer. Since
Hell usually personifies what would be considered excessive rather than deficiency in Aristotle’s code of ethics because of its background in the Catholic religion. One example of this exists with humility. In the Catholic context, humility stands a virtue that is praised in The Bible (and therefore Inferno) whereas in Nicomachean Ethics humility is a vice to be looked down on. This continues to be the case with many different excesses and virtues for Aristotle. Although some differences between vice and virtue exist in the two texts, the theory that Hell personifies the qualities Aristotle tells us to avoid is still plausible.
“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance” –George Bernard Shaw. The bodies politic in Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” and the Bible, the Commonwealth and Israelites, both have shallow beliefs and believe what they know to be true. The Platonic Prisoner, from Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”, and Moses, from the Book of Exodus in the Bible, both attempt to influence others with their newfound knowledge and wisdom because they feel the obligation to do so.They end up with different overall responses from their body politic as their relationships undergo change. For relationships to function, the bodies politic need to trust each other as well as courage. Relationship also need perseverance to last.
Plato claims that self-existent and unchanging forms and not the reality obtained through sensory experience are perfect concepts for objects that can be seen in our physical reality. In his Allegory of the Cave, Plato explains how a slave could be set free from chains to the shadows of this world by becoming aware of the higher reality of forms (the objects’ true forms once they leave the cave). His allegory claims that all humans are held prisoner in darkness as we believe actual reality to be the things that we can see around us. However, there is a true reality that exists beyond the physical world. For Plato, he believed we experience this absolute reality when our soul detaches from the body. He believed that the body and soul are two
Kaptitzke explains in his book that the bible is “The written Word of God, given by divine inspiration through Holy men of God who spoke and wrote as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.” He goes on to describe the belief in the Trinity stating, “There is one God: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, a unity of three co-eternal Persons.” “God is immortal, all knowing, and above all, ever present, He is infinite and beyond human comprehension yet known through self-revelation. He is worthy of worship adoration and service by the whole creation.” (Kapitzke
Paul’s incorporation of Platonic views to the religious sphere enlightened him, and he only followed this religious voice. Since he considered these other theologies disaggregated subsections of “his” Christianity, he could not accept them as truth, making him intolerant of these alternative voices. Hellenism was the prominent cultural delegator around 50 CE (Dean Frisina’s Lecture, 10/29/15). The spirit-matter distinction, that we can only have opinions about the physical world, while having knowledge of unchanging realities, was a strong theological idea at this time. We should aspire to escape this known, physical realm to leave a world of suffering and pain behind. Hellenism is shown to associate perfection with changelessness, and imperfection with decay and disintegration (Dean Frisina’s Lecture, 10/29/15). Early Christians were heavily influenced by the Hellenistic ideas around them as well, despite Christianity taking a more spiritual approach than its theological counterparts at this time. Jesus seldom mentioned escaping Roman rule, and never predicted such matters. He was more focused on the otherworldly, and believed we should use our time on Earth for a higher salvation in the afterlife. Paul’s emergence began the split in Early Christian views. Paul was even viewed as a persecutor of
Plato proves the tripartition of the soul in Republic IV by inferences found from the phenomenon of psychological conflict. He begins with showing how it is possible for someone to be standing still and be moving at the same time with their torso still while their hands are moving, displaying how people can have two conflicting properties simultaneously. Plato divides the soul into three parts appetite, spirit, and reason with each part able to lead to action. Allowing for endless possibilities of the three to conflict with each other. An example being reason conflicting with appetite when you know you shouldn’t eat that last piece of cake when you are on a diet. Knowing you should not eat the piece of cake represents the reason part of the
Veres 12-28 of chapter 15 of 1 Corinthians illustrates the influence Paul had on the formation of early Christianity. To Corinth, Paul rationalizes that if Corinth believes that there is no resurrection of the dead then Christ himself could not have been risen and if Christ has not been risen then their faith is in vain. Paul uses their own faith against them in a since as with his argument he forces Corinth to either reconcile with Paul’s views of resurrection or seemingly disband with Christianity altogether. As Paul himself claims in 1 Corinthians 3:6 to have founded the church in Corinth it seems most unde...
Plato’s view was biased due to the death of his mentor, Socrates. Plato intended to demonstrate the view of the majority during this time or what the people thought ought to be correct or more as of how agreeable they were. Karl Popper argues that Plato wished to have a comeback to tribalism and professes it to be propaganda though, Plato spoke about a desire for good and a neglect for anything else. Plato speaks of good citizens who do no wrong being insulted due to their love for being unknowingly chained and how the party may fall into the wrong hands if rulers act as the average citizens do. Of how they are chained by their own reality that they don't see the bigger picture and only see what they’re limited to in his view of the perfect
Plato believed that the body and the soul were two separate entities, the body being mortal and the soul being immortal. In Plato’s phaedo, this is further explained by Socrates. He claims that by living a philosophical life, we are able to eventually free the soul from the body and its needs. If we have not yield to our bodily needs, we should not fear death, since it can than permanently detach the soul from the body. The most convincing argument for the immortality of the body is the theory of recollection, which shows that we are already born with knowledge of forms and that learning is thus recalling these ideas. If we are already born with knowledge this implies that are soul is immortal, since it would otherwise be a blank page.